PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
New Balance Men's Mesh Jersey Performance Wicking No Fly Boxer Briefs

New Balance · Sports Performance Undergarments

New Balance Men's Mesh Jersey Performance Wicking No Fly Boxer Briefs

Bad

High risk. Skip until New Balance discloses treatment details.

Verdict · SkipPolyester boxer briefs carry routine textile hazards (dyes, finishes); New Balance's silence on moisture-wicking chemistry is the main concern.

Mesh boxer briefs feature unspecified moisture-wicking coating, often containing PFAS. New Balance has not disclosed treatment chemistry.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

polyester mesh with moisture-wicking finish

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
🎨

Azo dyes in polyester fabric

Polyester apparel is routinely dyed with azo colorants; while EU and many reputable brands restrict carcinogenic azo dyes, New Balance does not publish dye compliance data. Risk is low but not documented as zero.

70/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Some moisture-wicking coatings use formaldehyde-releasing resins for durability. New Balance does not disclose this detail, so residual formaldehyde contamination cannot be ruled out, particularly in new garments before first wash.

Source, ATSDR
70/ 100
💨

Finish degradation and off-gassing over time

All applied finishes degrade with washing and heat exposure. As the moisture-wicking treatment breaks down, microscopic particles or volatile compounds could be released; the absence of published finish chemistry means the composition of these degradation products is unknown.

20/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding from mesh

Polyester textiles shed microfibers during washing. Mesh construction with loose weave may shed more than tightly woven alternatives. This is a known category-wide issue, not specific to New Balance, but relevant to long-term environmental and potential inhalation exposure.

45/ 100

What’s reassuring

Antimony in polyester polymer

Antimony trioxide is a catalyst used in polyester production and typically remains as trace residue. No recall or contamination data exists for New Balance apparel, and levels in modern polyester have not triggered regulatory action, but independent testing is not publicly available.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This product is polyester mesh with an applied moisture-wicking finish. Polyester itself is a stable synthetic polymer, but the applied finish (likely a coating or chemical treatment to repel moisture and manage sweat) is where risk concentrates. The mesh construction increases surface area exposed to skin and washing, which can accelerate any finish degradation. Moisture-wicking finishes are typically proprietary formulations that may include surfactants, resins, or other additives not always disclosed to consumers.

The brand's record and disclosure

New Balance does not publicly disclose the chemistry of its moisture-wicking treatments on performance apparel. The brand has no known major safety recalls or contamination scandals in athletic wear, but the lack of transparency about functional finishes is notable given industry-wide concerns about PFAS use in water-repellent and sweat-management coatings. Competitors (Patagonia, some Nike lines) have begun disclosing or phasing out PFAS-based finishes; New Balance has not made similar public commitments.

How it compares in its category

Performance boxer briefs in this price range typically use polyester with undisclosed finishes, so New Balance is not exceptional in this respect. Some premium brands now offer PFAS-free moisture-wicking alternatives using plant-based or fluorine-free coatings, though these cost more. Natural-fiber alternatives (merino wool, organic cotton blends) eliminate the finish chemistry question entirely but sacrifice some performance and durability. New Balance's approach is mainstream but increasingly outdated given available alternatives.

If you buy it

Wash in cool or warm water with standard detergent; avoid chlorine bleach and fabric softeners, which can degrade synthetic finishes and potentially mobilize residual chemicals. Do not dry-clean or expose to high heat (dryers should be low or air-dry preferred) to prevent coating degradation and off-gassing. Replace after visible seam breakdown, pilling, or loss of moisture-wicking performance (typically 1-2 years of regular use). If skin irritation develops after purchase, discontinue use and rinse thoroughly; this may indicate sensitivity to the finish or dyes.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
New Balance has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Sports Performance Undergarments

Reebok Women's Air Tech Performance Brief Panties 6-Pack

Reebok

Women's Air Tech Performance Brief Panties 6-Pack

nylon, spandex, cotton blend

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade53Good
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🎨

Azo dyes

Limited concern

70

Elastomer degradation (spandex breakdown)

Limited concern

70

Lower concern with no known PFAS triggers identified.

Starting grade for this product type

Reebok Women's Seamless Hipster

Reebok

Women's Seamless Hipster

nylon/elastane blend, seamless knit

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade59Good

Elastane degradation and skin contact

Limited concern

70

Basic seamless intimate wear lacks water-resistant coatings.

Starting grade for this product type

Reebok Men's Featherweight Performance Boxer Briefs

Reebok

Men's Featherweight Performance Boxer Briefs

polyester and elastane blend

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade57Good
⚠️

Antimony in polyester synthesis

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding during washing

Limited concern

70

Polyester-elastane blend with no coating or water-repellent finish on record.

Starting grade for this product type

More sports performance undergarments grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.