Organic Cotton Panty Liners, ranked by PFAS safety

All 4 cotton-based options in our panty liners database, graded Bad to Excellent and ranked safest first. 2 earn a buy-worthy grade.

Kotex Core Daily Wrapped Liners

Kotex

Core Daily Wrapped Liners

cotton, rayon, adhesive (nonwoven blend)

PFAS Grade70Good
Overall Grade48Poor
⛏️

Synthetic adhesive leachables

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Fragrance allergens (if scented variant)

Moderate concern

45
🫧

Microplastic shedding from nonwoven backing

Limited concern

70
🏷️

PFAS

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern; standard period-liner materials without disclosed water-resistance treatment.

Risky category by default

Kotex Wrapped Liners

Kotex

Wrapped Liners

Cellulose/cotton absorbent core with adhesive backing

PFAS Grade70Good
Overall Grade62Good
⚠️

Adhesive skin contact sensitization

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Fragrance allergens (if present)

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern for this product type, but Kotex provides no transparency on coating materials.

Risky category by default

Thinx Leak-Fighting Rotation Set Underwear

Thinx

Leak-Fighting Rotation Set Underwear

Cotton/synthetic blend with waterproof/moisture-wicking coating (unspecified chemistry)

PFAS Grade25Poor
Poor

Don't buy until the brand reveals the waterproof coating material; period underwear's leak-fighting layer is a common PFAS concern.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

Thinx Leak-Fighting Cotton Brief Underwear

Thinx

Leak-Fighting Cotton Brief Underwear

Cotton blend with waterproof gusset coating (unspecified)

PFAS Grade25Poor
Poor

Don't buy until Thinx reveals the gusset treatment material or obtains third-party verification.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

See every material: all panty liners grades →