PFAS40/ 100Poor
Overall0/ 100Bad
303 Fabric Guard 2 oz

303 Protectant · Fabric Stain Guard Sprays

303 Fabric Guard 2 oz

Poor

Likely contains PFAS. No ingredient transparency from the brand.

Verdict · SkipSilicone-based fabric protectant with likely undisclosed PFAS; non-PFAS hazards minimal but brand transparency is poor. Use only as directed on natural fibers.

This water and stain repellent for fabrics typically relies on PFAS ingredients, yet the manufacturer remains silent on what goes into their formula.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Silicone-based water and stain repellent coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What 303 Fabric Guard 2 oz is made of, ingredients and materials

303 Fabric Guard is a silicone-based water and stain repellent spray designed for outdoor and indoor textiles. Silicone polymers themselves are generally stable and low-toxicity, but water and stain repellents in this product class are historically formulated with fluorinated compounds (PFAS) to achieve their water-shedding properties. The brand provides no ingredient list or chemistry breakdown for this 2 oz aerosol, making independent verification of PFAS presence impossible from public sources.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
💨

Inhalation of aerosol/silicone particles

Aerosol spray inhalation can irritate respiratory tract; risk is low if used outdoors or in ventilated spaces. 303 provides no warnings specific to inhalation duration or susceptible populations.

70/ 100
🍳

Coating buildup and fabric property changes

Repeated applications of silicone-based protectants can reduce breathability and alter hand-feel of technical and natural-fiber textiles over time. Not a toxicological hazard but a durability and performance issue documented in outdoor gear forums.

45/ 100
🏷️

Undisclosed volatile organic compounds (VOCs)

As an aerosol, this product likely contains solvents and propellants not listed on the 2 oz label. Typical silicone spray formulations include hydrocarbons or dimethyl ether; specific composition unknown for this brand.

70/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Water and stain repellents in this product class are historically PFAS-based; the brand's total silence on this chemistry strongly suggests PFAS use. No public commitment to avoiding fluorocarbon chemistry is documented.

Source, ATSDR ↗
20/ 100
⚠️

Lack of safety data sheet access

Consumer-grade 2 oz bottles typically do not include full SDS; the brand does not appear to publish them online. This limits ability to verify specific hazards or allergenic ingredients.

45/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

303 Products (brand under Armor All/Energizer ownership) does not publicly disclose PFAS status, full ingredient lists, or safety certifications for this fabric guard line. The parent company has not made commitments to phase out PFAS-based chemistries. No product-specific recalls or safety incidents appear in public databases, but absence of disclosure is not absence of hazard. This contrasts with transparent competitors who label PFAS-free or publish safety data sheets.

How it compares in its category

Fabric protectants vary widely, some use silicone systems not linked to PFAS, others still rely on fluorocarbons. 303 Fabric Guard sits in the middle-cost segment without transparent chemistry, making comparison difficult. Brands like Nikwax and Granger's now market PFAS-free alternatives; 303's silence on this choice is a relative weakness in informed consumer markets. For outdoor gear specifically, options with silicone systems not linked to PFAS are now readily available.

If you buy it

Apply only in well-ventilated areas; aerosol inhalation of silicone particles is a minor respiratory irritant risk. Test on hidden seams first, as silicone can affect breathability of technical fabrics. Reapply every 6-12 months depending on use and washing frequency. Store away from heat and flame (aerosol can). Do not use on food-contact textiles (cloth napkins, kitchen towels). If PFAS disclosure remains unavailable and you have environmental concerns, consider switching to documented PFAS-free brands.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
303 Protectant has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

What are the PFAS-free alternatives to 303 Fabric Guard 2 oz?

Nikwax Waterproofing Wax for Leather

Nikwax

Waterproofing Wax for Leather

65GoodPFAS grade
  • wax-based waterproofing
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Respiratory irritation or fume inhalation during application

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
  • mink oil paste, natural oil-based conditioner
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Microbial growth (natural oil rancidity)

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
  • Polyester with silicone-based water-repellent coating
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Coating degradation and microplastic shedding

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon

More fabric stain guard sprays grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.