PFAS40/ 100Poor
Overall18/ 100Bad
303 Fabric Guard Fabric Protectant Spray

303 Protectant · Fabric Stain Guard Sprays

303 Fabric Guard Fabric Protectant Spray

Poor

Avoid until brand provides ingredient transparency; repellent coatings often use PFAS.

Verdict · SkipPFAS content unconfirmed but typical for water-repellent coatings; no other hazards reported; use only as directed and allow full cure before contact.

Water and stain protectant spray using proprietary coating formula. Brand makes no PFAS claims; fabric protectants frequently contain fluorinated compounds.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

proprietary water and stain repellent coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What 303 Fabric Guard Fabric Protectant Spray is made of, ingredients and materials

303 Fabric Guard is a proprietary water and stain repellent coating designed to bond to synthetic and natural fibers. The exact chemical formulation is not publicly disclosed, which is standard practice for branded protectants but prevents independent hazard assessment. Water-repellent textile finishes historically rely on fluorinated compounds (PFAS) to achieve durability, though some modern alternatives use silicone-based or hydrocarbon chemistries. Without ingredient transparency, the presence and type of any PFAS cannot be confirmed from available sources.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

Vague safety claims only

Uses vague language ("eco-friendly", "clean") without a specific PFAS statement.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Water and stain repellent finishes commonly contain perfluorinated compounds for durability. 303 does not disclose whether its proprietary formula includes PFAS; the absence of a PFAS-free claim suggests possible presence. No independent testing on this product is publicly available.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100
💨

Inhalation risk from spray application

Aerosol fabric protectants release fine particles and volatile organic compounds during application. Acute respiratory irritation is possible with inadequate ventilation, particularly in sensitive individuals. No specific pulmonary hazard data for this product is documented, but spray-on textile treatments routinely warrant respiratory precaution.

70/ 100
💨

Volatile organic compound (VOC) off-gassing

Spray-applied coatings typically contain solvents and carriers that evaporate during and after application. The treated fabric may continue minimal off-gassing for hours to days; quantitative VOC data for this product is not publicly available.

70/ 100
🍳

Coating durability and reapplication burden

The product requires periodic reapplication, indicating the coating is not permanent. Frequent reapplication increases cumulative exposure to spray inhalation and unconfirmed chemical ingredients over time.

45/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Skin irritation or sensitization from dried residue

Once fully cured, fabric protectants are generally considered low-risk for skin contact. No adverse event reports specific to 303 Fabric Guard are documented, but individual sensitivity to coating residues cannot be excluded.

95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

303 Products is a marine and automotive protective coatings manufacturer with no public disclosure of PFAS content in their fabric product line. The brand has not published ingredient lists, safety data sheets for consumer use, or statements addressing PFAS concerns. No major recalls or safety controversies are documented for this specific product. The silence on ingredients is a significant limitation for informed purchasing.

How it compares in its category

Fabric protectant sprays occupy a gray zone, some brands now disclose PFAS-free formulations (Scotchgard Advanced, for example, moved away from PFOS in the 2000s), while others remain opaque. 303's lack of transparency places it in the higher-risk segment compared to brands offering third-party testing or explicit PFAS-free certifications. Performance claims are comparable, but safety assurance is lower.

If you buy it

Apply in a well-ventilated area (outdoors preferred) to avoid inhalation of spray particles. Allow the treated fabric to dry completely before contact with skin or food-contact surfaces, typically 24-48 hours depending on humidity. Do not spray on furniture used by infants or very young children without extended ventilation. Reapply every 6-12 months depending on use and washing frequency; reapplication suggests the coating degrades normally over time.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
303 Protectant has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

What are the PFAS-free alternatives to 303 Fabric Guard Fabric Protectant Spray?

Nikwax Waterproofing Wax for Leather

Nikwax

Waterproofing Wax for Leather

65GoodPFAS grade
  • wax-based waterproofing
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Respiratory irritation or fume inhalation during application

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
  • mink oil paste, natural oil-based conditioner
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Microbial growth (natural oil rancidity)

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
Timberland Waximum Waxed Leather Protector

Timberland

Waximum Waxed Leather Protector

65GoodPFAS grade
  • Wax-based leather protector
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from solvents

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon

More fabric stain guard sprays grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.