PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall61/ 100Good
Aussie Total Miracle Conditioner

Aussie · Conditioner

Aussie Total Miracle Conditioner

Excellent

Lower PFAS concern for a rinse-off conditioner. Typical formulation poses minimal risk.

Verdict · BuyRinse-off conditioner with no hazard of this kind on record; typical formulation shows lower concern for regular use.

This rinse-off conditioner requires no durable water repellency or stain resistance. While silicones rarely contain trace PFAS, the brand provides no transparency on this detail.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

aqueous conditioner base (water, silicones, conditioning agents)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Aussie Total Miracle Conditioner is made of, ingredients and materials

Aussie Total Miracle Conditioner is a water-based rinse-off formula containing silicones (likely dimethicone), emollients, and conditioning polymers typical of mainstream hair conditioners. Silicones are occlusive but non-absorbed; they wash out completely and pose no systemic risk. The aqueous base means volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are minimal, and the product is not heated during use, eliminating fume or thermal degradation concerns common in cookware or styling tools.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Aussie Total Miracle lists fragrance/parfum as an ingredient. Individual sensitivity varies; common allergens in conditioner fragrances include limonene and linalool. Risk is low for most users but known trigger for people with fragrance contact dermatitis.

70/ 100
⚠️

Silicone buildup on hair and scalp

Heavy silicone conditioners can accumulate over time, potentially causing weighted-down hair or scalp congestion in some users. This is cosmetic rather than toxicological but worth noting for regular long-term use.

45/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
✅

Preservative sensitivity (1,4-dioxane risk in ethoxylated ingredients)

No 1,4-dioxane has been reported in Aussie conditioners. However, if ethoxylated surfactants are used, manufacturing could introduce trace dioxane. No testing results are publicly available for this specific product.

95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Aussie Total Miracle Conditioner is a clear/translucent formula with no reported colorant additions. Standard formulations do not include mineral pigments, so heavy metal risk from dyes is not a concern.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No formaldehyde-releasing preservatives (e.g., DMDM hydantoin, imidazolidinyl urea) are listed in the published ingredient deck. If present, they would be declared on the label.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Aussie (owned by Procter & Gamble) does not publish detailed ingredient sourcing or safety certifications for this product line. The brand has no widely documented safety recalls or controversies specific to Total Miracle Conditioner. Ingredient lists are compliant with FDA and EU labeling standards, but no third-party certifications (e.g., EWG Verified, Leaping Bunny) are claimed, meaning transparency is limited to regulatory baseline.

How it compares in its category

This product sits in the mainstream mass-market conditioner segment with formulations similar to competitors like Pantene or Garnier. It lacks premium certifications (organic, sulfate-free claims) but also avoids some premium price points that sometimes correlate with higher scrutiny of supply chains. For a rinse-off product category, safety profiles are generally comparable across this tier; concern differentiators are minimal.

If you buy it

Use as directed, apply to damp hair, leave briefly, and rinse thoroughly. No special precautions are needed; the product is designed for scalp and hair contact and is non-systemically absorbed. Store at room temperature away from direct sunlight to prevent separation or degradation. If irritation occurs (rare with rinse-off conditioners), discontinue and consult a dermatologist; most reactions are fragrance or preservative sensitivity rather than chemical hazard.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Aussie has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Aussie Total Miracle Conditioner?

Avalon Organics

Biotin B-Complex Thickening Conditioner

85ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Water, conditioning agents, organic plant extracts
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Heavy metals

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avalon Organics

Rosemary Volumizing Conditioner

85ExcellentPFAS grade
  • water-based conditioner, typical surfactants and botanical extracts
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Heavy metals

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

More conditioner grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.