PFAS50/ 100Good
Overall42/ 100Poor
B+W Basic UV Haze MRC Filter

B+W · Waterproof Camera & Lens Protection Cases

B+W Basic UV Haze MRC Filter

Good

Glass optics unlikely PFAS risk; coating composition undisclosed by brand.

Verdict · SkipOptical glass filter with minimal established hazards; no known recalls or contamination issues; coating composition opaque but standard for category.

B+W UV filters use optical glass with multi-coated anti-reflection coating designed for lens protection. No PFAS disclosure is available; coating specifics remain unknown but typical lens coatings rarely use PFAS.

The better-graded swap

Seahorse Portable Waterproof Dry Box Protective Case

Seahorse

Seahorse Portable Waterproof Dry Box Protective Case

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Optical glass with multi-coated (MRC) lens coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What B+W Basic UV Haze MRC Filter is made of, ingredients and materials

B+W Basic UV Haze filters consist of optical glass (borosilicate or soda-lime silicate) with a multi-coated (MRC) anti-reflective lens coating applied to both surfaces. The glass substrate itself is chemically inert and poses no leaching or off-gassing risk under normal use. The coating composition is proprietary and undisclosed by B+W, typical of the optical filter industry, but MRC coatings are generally hard inorganic oxide layers (magnesium fluoride, silicon oxide, or similar) designed to reduce reflections and improve light transmission.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Unknown / proprietary coating

A coating is recorded with no disclosed chemistry.

75/ 100
🍂

Coating delamination or wear

MRC coatings on budget filters may degrade with age or rough handling, but degradation affects only optical performance (reduced anti-reflective benefit), not chemical safety or leaching.

70/ 100
⚠️

Glass dust if broken

Broken filter glass presents a mechanical cutting and inhalation hazard similar to any glass object; not specific to this product but relevant if mishandled or dropped.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

⛏️

Heavy metals

Modern borosilicate optical glass is formulated to exclude lead and cadmium; B+W does not disclose raw material sourcing, but no contamination incidents are documented for this product or brand.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100
✅

Coating manufacturing residues

Proprietary MRC coating processes may leave solvents or catalysts, but filters undergo quality control before sale and are not in contact with skin, food, or inhalation pathways during normal use.

95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

B+W (part of the Schneider Optics Group) does not publicly disclose detailed material safety data, PFAS content, or environmental sourcing for optical filters. No product recalls, safety controversies, or documented contamination issues are on public record for this product line. The brand is established in professional optical manufacturing but offers minimal transparency compared to consumer goods sectors; this is industry-standard practice for optical components rather than a red flag.

How it compares in its category

UV and haze filters are among the lowest-risk camera accessories because they do not heat, degrade easily, or contact skin or food. The B+W Basic variant is a budget-tier option with single-layer MRC coating versus premium multi-layer coatings on higher-end filters, but this affects optical performance, not safety. Competing filters from Hoya, Tiffen, and Kenko are similarly opaque on coating composition; no major brand in this category discloses or publishes safety test data.

If you buy it

Store the filter in a dust cap or protective case to prevent scratching the coated surfaces, which can degrade optical quality but poses no health risk. Clean with lens paper and lens cleaning solution only; avoid abrasive cloths that may wear the coating. Replace if the glass develops chips or cracks, though broken glass is a mechanical injury hazard, not a chemical one. No special temperature, moisture, or usage precautions are required for normal camera operation.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
B+W has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

What are the PFAS-free alternatives to B+W Basic UV Haze MRC Filter?

B+W UV Haze 010 Filter

B+W

UV Haze 010 Filter

85ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Optical glass lens with multi-coated optical surfaces
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • No PFAS statement found from the brand
Best Samsung Galaxy S25/S24/S23 Ultra Lens

Samsung

Best Samsung Galaxy S25/S24/S23 Ultra Lens

85ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Glass lens (borosilicate or soda-lime glass)
  • Optical coating degradation

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Sigma 58mm WR Protector Filter

Sigma

58mm WR Protector Filter

85ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Optical glass, aluminum frame, non-coated optical surfaces
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Optical glass fragility and sharp edges

More waterproof camera & lens protection cases grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.