PFAS50/ 100Good
Overall46/ 100Poor
B&W B+W UV-Filter F-Pro 010 MRC 77

B+W · Waterproof Camera & Lens Protection Cases

B&W B+W UV-Filter F-Pro 010 MRC 77

Good

Optical glass filter with no PFAS disclosure; lower concern likely.

Verdict · SkipOptical glass UV filter with inert materials and no known safety hazards; standard professional product with clean track record.

UV filters are optical glass with anti-reflective multi-coatings. B+W discloses nothing about PFAS content, though glass itself is not associated with PFAS; coating composition remains unknown.

The better-graded swap

Waterproof Thermal Camera Case for FLIR C8, C5, C3 & C2

Waterproof Thermal Camera Case for FLIR C8, C5, C3 & C2

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

optical glass with multi-coated (MRC) lens coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Unknown / proprietary coating

A coating is recorded with no disclosed chemistry.

75/ 100
🍳

Manufacturing residues on coating surface

New optical filters may have light dust, oils, or manufacturing residue on the glass surface, but these are external contaminants, not hazardous materials. Simple lens cleaning before first use resolves this.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Coating delamination or degradation

Multi-coated optical filters can theoretically degrade if exposed to extreme humidity, temperature cycling, or harsh solvents, but this is not established as a problem for B+W MRC filters under normal use. Damage would be optical (loss of coating function) rather than a health hazard.

95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Oxide-based MRC coatings do not contain cadmium, lead, or other regulated heavy metals. Professional optics manufacturing is not associated with toxic metal contamination in this product class.

Source, FDA
95/ 100

Leaching or off-gassing from glass or coatings

Optical glass is chemically stable and does not leach contaminants into food, water, or skin. Metal oxide coatings are similarly inert and do not off-gas volatile compounds during normal light exposure or handling.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The B+W F-Pro 010 is a UV absorption filter made from optical glass with multi-coated (MRC) anti-reflection lens coatings. The glass itself is chemically inert and does not leach or off-gas during normal use. The MRC coating is a thin multilayer stack of metal oxides (typically magnesium fluoride, aluminum oxide, or similar) designed to reduce reflections and improve light transmission; these materials are standard in optics and not known to degrade into hazardous byproducts under normal handling or light exposure.

The brand's record and disclosure

B+W (Schneider Optics) has not published explicit PFAS-free certifications for optical filters, but the product category (glass optics) is not flagged in major PFAS disclosure campaigns. The brand is an established German optics manufacturer with no public safety recalls or health controversies related to optical filters. Disclosure is minimal, which is typical for optics; the lack of transparency is not an indicator of hidden risk in this case.

How it compares in its category

Optical glass filters are inherently low-risk compared to coated cookware or chemical-laden cosmetics. UV filters of this type are a commodity; Hoya, Kenko, and other competitors use similar optical glass and oxide coatings. The MRC coating in this model is standard professional-grade optics technology with no meaningful differentiation in safety profile between brands in this segment.

If you buy it

Store the filter in a clean, dry case to prevent dust and fingerprints. Do not expose it to extreme temperature swings or solvents; lens cleaning fluid and soft cloths are appropriate. The glass and coating are durable indefinitely under normal photographic use. No maintenance beyond occasional cleaning is required; replacement is not necessary unless optical degradation becomes visible (rare without physical damage).

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
B+W has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Waterproof Camera & Lens Protection Cases

Think Tank Digital Holster 5 V3

Think Tank Photo

Think Tank Digital Holster 5 V3

Ballistic nylon, weather-sealed fabric, metal hardware

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
🏷️

Undisclosed water-repellent coating chemistry

Limited concern

70

Coating degradation over time

Limited concern

70

Camera holster with weather treatment; PFAS status undisclosed.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Nikon WP-CP3 Marine Case for Camera

Nikon

WP-CP3 Marine Case for Camera

Polycarbonate/rubber with waterproof seals

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade73Good

Polycarbonate degradation over time

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Rubber gasket hardening and seal failure

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Microbial growth in sealed moisture pockets

Limited concern

70

No coating described, and no PFAS statement from the brand.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Nikon WP-N1 Waterproof Housing

Nikon

WP-N1 Waterproof Housing

Polycarbonate housing with waterproof seals

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade77Excellent

Gasket material degradation

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Polycarbonate microcracking or crazing

Limited concern

70

No coating described, and no PFAS statement from the brand.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More waterproof camera & lens protection cases grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.