PFAS50/ 100Good
Overall42/ 100Poor
B+W Master UV Haze MRC Nano Filter

B+W · Waterproof Camera & Lens Protection Cases

B+W Master UV Haze MRC Nano Filter

Good

Optical glass filter, likely reduced PFAS risk; no brand disclosure available.

Verdict · SkipOptical glass filter with protective nano-coating; no established safety hazards beyond typical PFAS uncertainty in coating.

B+W UV filters use optical glass, a generally inert material with low inherent PFAS risk. MRC nano-coating specifics are kept private by the brand, creating minor uncertainty.

The better-graded swap

Waterproof Camera Filter

Waterproof Camera Filter

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Optical glass with MRC nano-coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Unknown / proprietary coating

A coating is recorded with no disclosed chemistry.

75/ 100
🍳

Nano-coating composition and leachable unknown

The MRC nano-coating is proprietary and B+W does not disclose whether fluorine-based or PFAS-containing compounds are used. Since the filter does not contact food, water, or skin, ingestion or dermal absorption risk is negligible; hazard is primarily theoretical and tied to unknown manufacturing byproducts.

70/ 100
⚠️

Glass breakage and sharp edges

Optical glass is fragile and can shatter if dropped or impacted. Broken edges pose a cut hazard during handling or cleaning; this is a mechanical rather than chemical safety concern and inherent to all glass optical products.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Coating degradation and particle shedding

No published evidence of nano-coating degradation, flaking, or microparticle release under normal use or storage. Optical glass coatings are extremely durable; visible failure would require impact, abrasive cleaning, or extreme temperature cycling.

95/ 100
🧠

Lead

Optical-grade borosilicate glass used in modern filters does not contain lead or cadmium additives. B+W's quality standards are consistent with industrial and scientific optics, which are subject to RoHS and similar restrictions.

Source, ATSDR
95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Optical glass and thin nano-coatings do not emit volatile organic compounds under normal indoor or outdoor storage and use conditions. No thermal exposure or decomposition occurs in the photographic use case.

Source, ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The B+W Master UV Haze filter is precision optical glass (borosilicate-based) with a multi-resistant coating (MRC) nano-layer applied to reduce reflections and protect the glass. The core glass itself is chemically inert and not a source of leaching or off-gassing under normal use. The nano-coating is the only functional chemical layer, and its exact composition is proprietary; B+W does not publicly disclose whether it contains PFOA, PFOS, or other per- and polyfluoroalkyl compounds, though fluorine-based compounds are common in optical coatings for water and oil resistance.

The brand's record and disclosure

B+W (Schneider Optics, part of the Schneider Group) is a long-established German optical manufacturer with strong reputation in photography and industrial optics, but provides minimal transparency on PFAS use in their coatings. No major recalls or documented safety incidents tied to their filters have been published. The brand does not publicly commit to PFAS reduction or disclose coating chemistry, which limits independent verification of alternatives with lower PFAS concern in their product line.

How it compares in its category

UV haze filters present lower concern as optical accessories because they sit outside the light path (mounted on lens barrel) and never contact food, skin, or consumables. Compared to coated optics used in high-end telescopes or industrial lenses, photography filters see minimal wear and are replaced infrequently, reducing long-term exposure risk. Most competing brands (Hoya, Kenko, Tiffen) employ similar proprietary nano-coatings with equivalent PFAS ambiguity and no greater disclosed safety advantages.

If you buy it

Handle the filter by its edges to avoid fingerprints on the coated glass surfaces; fingerprints do not damage the coating but reduce optical clarity. Store in a clean, dry container or original case to prevent dust settling on the coated surfaces. Replacement is needed only if the glass breaks or the coating visibly degrades (cloudiness, peeling); under normal storage, filters last indefinitely. Clean with lens-grade microfiber cloth and approved optical cleaning solution only; avoid paper towels or harsh solvents.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
B+W has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Waterproof Camera & Lens Protection Cases

Think Tank Digital Holster 5 V3

Think Tank Photo

Think Tank Digital Holster 5 V3

Ballistic nylon, weather-sealed fabric, metal hardware

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
🏷️

Undisclosed water-repellent coating chemistry

Limited concern

70

Coating degradation over time

Limited concern

70

Camera holster with weather treatment; PFAS status undisclosed.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Nikon WP-CP3 Marine Case for Camera

Nikon

WP-CP3 Marine Case for Camera

Polycarbonate/rubber with waterproof seals

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade73Good

Polycarbonate degradation over time

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Rubber gasket hardening and seal failure

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Microbial growth in sealed moisture pockets

Limited concern

70

No coating described, and no PFAS statement from the brand.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Nikon WP-N1 Waterproof Housing

Nikon

WP-N1 Waterproof Housing

Polycarbonate housing with waterproof seals

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade77Excellent

Gasket material degradation

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Polycarbonate microcracking or crazing

Limited concern

70

No coating described, and no PFAS statement from the brand.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More waterproof camera & lens protection cases grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.