PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall63/ 100Good
Bumble and Bumble Super Rich Conditioner

Bumble and bumble · Conditioner

Bumble and Bumble Super Rich Conditioner

Excellent

Lower-medium risk. Typical rinse-off cosmetic lacks known PFAS triggers.

Verdict · BuyWater-based rinse-off conditioner with no established hazards; typical silicone and preservative profile poses minimal exposure risk for intermittent use.

This rinse-off conditioner contains emollients, proteins, and silicones without waterproofing or grease-proofing treatments. The brand doesn't publicly test for or claim PFAS-free status, and cosmetic formulas can vary.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

Water-based conditioner; emollients, proteins, silicones, preservatives

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Bumble and Bumble Super Rich Conditioner is made of, ingredients and materials

Bumble and Bumble Super Rich Conditioner is a water-based emulsion containing silicones (for smoothing and detangling), plant proteins (for conditioning), and standard cosmetic preservatives. Because this product is rinsed off after brief scalp and hair contact, dermal absorption of problematic ingredients is minimal. Silicones in rinse-off formulas do not bioaccumulate or penetrate skin; they coat and wash away.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
⚠️

Preservative contact sensitivity

Water-based conditioners require preservative systems (likely paraben or phenoxyethanol derivatives); scalp contact is brief but repeated exposure may trigger sensitization in prone individuals. No specific allergen data published by brand.

70/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Product is fragranced; undisclosed fragrance components may include allergens such as limonene, geraniol, or linalool. Rinse-off format reduces risk, but scalp-sensitive individuals should test on a small area first.

70/ 100
⚠️

Silicone buildup on scalp

Cumulative silicone deposit may cause heaviness, greasiness, or reduced product absorption if used daily for months without clarifying shampoo. This is a cosmetic concern, not a toxicity hazard, but relevant to long-term user experience.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

No reports of lead, cadmium, or arsenic contamination in Bumble and bumble conditioners. This hazard class is relevant to pigmented cosmetics; a clear or lightly tinted conditioner poses minimal risk, but brand does not disclose heavy metal testing.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100
✅

1,4-dioxane (manufacturing impurity)

Water-based cosmetics processed with ethoxylated surfactants may contain trace 1,4-dioxane as a byproduct. No testing or recalls document this in Bumble and bumble formulas, and rinse-off use further minimizes exposure.

95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Bumble and bumble (owned by Estee Lauder) does not publish detailed ingredient sourcing, heavy metal testing, or preservative safety data sheets publicly. The brand has no documented safety recalls or regulatory actions on file for this product. No third-party certifications (e.g., clean beauty, toxin-free) are claimed, which is typical for mainstream prestige haircare but limits independent verification of manufacturing standards.

How it compares in its category

This conditioner is positioned as a premium, silicone-forward formula typical of high-end salon haircare. It sits between drugstore conditioners (lower silicone load, cheaper emollients) and clean beauty brands (silicone-free, marketed preservative transparency). The silicone content is higher than sulfate-free or natural alternatives, which appeals to damage-repair positioning but offers no safety advantage or disadvantage versus comparable brands in this tier.

If you buy it

Use as directed, apply to damp hair, leave on 1-3 minutes, rinse thoroughly. No heat or storage risk; keep in a cool, dry place and replace if the formula separates, smells off, or shows discoloration. If scalp sensitivity, redness, or itching develops, discontinue and patch test before reuse. Standard conditioner lifespan is 12-24 months after opening.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 78% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Bumble and bumble has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Bumble and Bumble Super Rich Conditioner?

Avalon Organics

Biotin B-Complex Thickening Conditioner

85ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Water, conditioning agents, organic plant extracts
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Heavy metals

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avalon Organics

Rosemary Volumizing Conditioner

85ExcellentPFAS grade
  • water-based conditioner, typical surfactants and botanical extracts
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Heavy metals

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

More conditioner grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.