PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall63/ 100Good
Bumble and Bumble Thickening Volume Conditioner

Bumble and bumble · Conditioner

Bumble and Bumble Thickening Volume Conditioner

Excellent

Lower-medium risk. Standard rinse-off conditioner shows no PFAS red flags.

Verdict · BuyStandard aqueous conditioner with no established safety red flags; silicone and polymer base poses minimal hazard if used as directed.

This rinse-off conditioner with polymers and silicones lacks any water-repellent, non-stick, or stain-resistant features. The brand has released no PFAS information and no public lab data exists.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

aqueous conditioner with polymers and silicones (typical formulation)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Bumble and Bumble Thickening Conditioner is made of, ingredients and materials

Bumble and Bumble Thickening Volume Conditioner is a water-based conditioner formulated with silicones (likely dimethicone or similar) and conditioning polymers to coat and volumize hair. The aqueous base means no volatile organic compounds typical of leave-on styling products, and silicones are largely inert once applied to hair. Polymers and thickeners are standard cosmetic ingredients not known to bioaccumulate or penetrate skin significantly.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens and sensitizers

Bumble and Bumble formulations typically include fragrance blends; specific allergen disclosure (e.g. limonene, linalool, cinnamal) is not standardized on retail packaging. Individuals with fragrance sensitivities should verify the full ingredient list or conduct a patch test before full-scalp use.

70/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Mainstream conditioners may contain preservatives such as DMDM hydantoin or imidazolidinyl urea, both formaldehyde releasers; Bumble and Bumble does not publicly disclose preservative systems. Concentrations in rinse-off products are generally low and not regulated as a major concern by FDA, but sensitive individuals may react.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100
⚠️

Silicone buildup and scalp irritation with chronic use

Silicones in this volumizing formula can accumulate on hair and scalp with heavy, long-term use if not removed by clarifying shampoos. This is a cosmetic concern (dull appearance, potential itch) rather than a toxicological hazard, but worth noting for sensitive scalp users.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

No heavy metal contamination has been reported in this product or brand. Rinse-off conditioners are lower-risk than leave-on styling products or color treatments for metal accumulation, and the brand has not faced regulatory action for metal residues.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100
✅

Microplastic beads or exfoliants

This is a conditioner, not a scrub or exfoliant product; no solid microplastics are intentionally included. The formula contains dissolved or suspended polymers only.

95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Bumble and Bumble (Estee Lauder-owned) does not publicly disclose PFAS testing or commitment to phase-out, which is typical for mainstream prestige haircare brands. The brand has no publicized recalls or major safety controversies on record for this product line. Ingredient lists are available on retailer sites and Bumble's website, though the brand does not independently certify for heavy metals, allergens, or contaminant screening as standard practice.

How it compares in its category

This product sits in the mainstream premium haircare category; its silicone-polymer formula is industry-standard for volumizing conditioners and carries no unusual hazard profile versus comparable brands (Pantene, Tresemmé, or salon brands like Olaplex). The main differentiation is price and marketing rather than safety. Consumers seeking allergen-free or heavy-metal-tested alternatives would need to pursue independent testing or certified organic/clean brands.

If you buy it

Use as a rinse-off product after shampooing; do not ingest or apply to broken skin. Store in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight to prevent premature degradation of the silicone emulsion. Discontinue use if scalp irritation or allergic reaction develops (rare with this formula). Replace every 12 months once opened to minimize bacterial growth from standing water exposure.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Bumble and bumble has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Bumble and Bumble Thickening Volume Conditioner?

Avalon Organics

Biotin B-Complex Thickening Conditioner

85ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Water, conditioning agents, organic plant extracts
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Heavy metals

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avalon Organics

Rosemary Volumizing Conditioner

85ExcellentPFAS grade
  • water-based conditioner, typical surfactants and botanical extracts
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Heavy metals

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

More conditioner grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.