PFAS40/ 100Poor
Overall10/ 100Bad
Tabby Cat with Flowers by Nene Thomas iPhone 15 Plus Waterproof Case

CAT · Waterproof Phone Cases

Tabby Cat with Flowers by Nene Thomas iPhone 15 Plus Waterproof Case

Poor

Skip. Waterproof phone case coating likely contains PFAS.

Verdict: SkipPFAS-laden waterproof coating + silent brand stance on chemical safety make this a poor choice for regular skin contact.

Waterproof phone cases typically use fluorinated water-repellent coating coatings to repel water and oil. Brand provides no PFAS disclosure or third-party verification of materials used.

The safe swap

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max TechWoven Case with MagSafe

Apple

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max TechWoven Case with MagSafe

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

TPU/silicone blend with unspecified waterproof coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🍳

Waterproof coating leaching (fluorinated compounds)

Unspecified waterproof topcoat in phone cases typically contains fluorinated polymers that can leach onto skin with sweat and friction over time. No independent testing of this specific product is on record, but the material class and lack of disclosure indicate elevated risk.

20/ 100
💨

TPU degradation and off-gassing

TPU can slowly degrade with UV exposure and heat, releasing volatile organic compounds (VOCs) with a plasticizer-like odor. This is more noticeable in cheaper TPU formulations and does not necessarily indicate toxicity but suggests lower material quality and durability.

70/ 100

Silicone degradation under stress

Silicone in blended cases can become tacky or sticky after prolonged exposure to body heat and sweat, indicating polymer breakdown. This does not pose acute toxicity risk but signals material aging and potential loss of water-resistance properties.

70/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding from coating wear

As the waterproof coating and TPU surface wear with daily use, microscopic fragments may shed into pockets, hands, or the environment. No specific data on this case exists, but this is a known concern for mass-produced phone cases used for 1-3 years.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Colorant or pigment safety (dyes in printed design)

The Nene Thomas flower artwork is likely applied via screen printing or heat transfer. No specific testing or complaints about this product's pigments have surfaced, but low-cost phone case printing sometimes uses azo dyes or heavy-metal-containing inks without third-party verification.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This case is a TPU (thermoplastic polyurethane) and silicone blend with an unspecified waterproof topcoat. The waterproof layer is the critical unknown: phone case manufacturers typically rely on fluorinated polymers or Teflon-type coating-based coatings to achieve water resistance, both of which are chemically stable but sourced from PFAS-containing precursors. TPU and silicone themselves are relatively benign, but the coating is where leaching risk concentrates, especially during thermal stress or with frequent hand contact and perspiration.

The brand's record and disclosure

CAT (the brand) has no public transparency record on waterproof coating chemistry or PFAS mitigation. The brand has not published material safety data sheets, manufacturing standards, or commitments to fluorine-free alternatives. This silence is notable because responsible case manufacturers increasingly disclose coating composition or certify PFAS-free status. Without disclosure, there is no way to verify whether the waterproof layer uses legacy fluorinated compounds or newer alternatives.

How it compares in its category

Phone cases occupy a gray zone: they are not food-contact items, but they contact skin, hair, and pockets for hours daily. Most mass-market waterproof cases use similar fluorinated coatings without labeling. Premium alternatives (OtterBox, Spigen with published materials) have begun moving toward non-fluorinated waterproofing, though cost and durability trade-offs are real. This CAT product offers no competitive advantage in safety disclosure and sits in the lower-transparency tier of the market.

If you buy it

Minimize skin contact and wash hands after prolonged use. Avoid exposing the case to sustained heat (hot vehicles, direct sunlight for extended periods) which can accelerate coating degradation and leaching. Do not intentionally submerge for extended periods; waterproof coatings degrade over months of heavy water exposure. Replace if the coating shows visible cracks, peeling, or discoloration, as this signals barrier failure and increased leaching risk.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
CAT has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Waterproof Phone Cases

Blackview C03 Leather Protective Case with Shoulder Strap For Active 7/Active 10 Pro

Blackview

C03 Leather Protective Case with Shoulder Strap For Active 7/Active 10 Pro

leather (primary material), shoulder strap

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
🧠

Lead

Limited concern

70
🎨

Synthetic dyes and colorants in leather and strap fabric

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from tanning and finishing

Moderate concern

45
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70

Lower concern. Leather cases rarely treated with PFAS.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Griffin Survivor Case with Belt Clip for Apple iPhone 4/4S GB01902

Griffin

Survivor Case with Belt Clip for Apple iPhone 4/4S GB01902

Polycarbonate, silicone, TPE

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade81Excellent
💨

Volatile organic compound (VOC) off-gassing

Limited concern

70

Lower concern phone case.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Griffin Survivor Strong for iPhone 11 Pro GIP-023

Griffin

Survivor Strong for iPhone 11 Pro GIP-023

TPU, polycarbonate, recycled plastic

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade77Excellent
🎨

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70
💨

VOC off-gassing (polycarbonate/TPU)

Limited concern

70

Phone case materials lower concern.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More waterproof phone cases grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.