PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Columbia Landroamer 60L Duffel

Columbia · Waterproof Outdoor Gear Storage Bags

Columbia Landroamer 60L Duffel

Bad

Water-resistant coating present; PFAS risk unconfirmed without brand details.

Verdict · SkipDurable polyester-nylon duffel with uncertain water-repellent coating chemistry; no formaldehyde or dye concerns on record, but PFAS disclosure gap and coating degradation risk warrant caution.

The polyester and nylon duffel features a water-resistant treatment typical of outdoor storage gear. The brand hasn't published any PFAS information or testing results.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

polyester/nylon with water-repellent coating water-resistant coating

Lab data

No public lab test

What Columbia Landroamer 60L Duffel is made of, ingredients and materials

The Landroamer 60L combines polyester and nylon fabrics, both synthetic polymers that are chemically stable in normal use. The key concern is the water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating applied to the exterior; this coating is typically fluorocarbon-based and is the primary source of PFAS risk in modern outdoor gear. Columbia has not publicly disclosed the specific water-repellent coating chemistry used on this model, leaving the PFAS risk status uncertain.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

water-repellent coating degradation and unknown fluorocarbon content

The water-repellent coating finish will degrade over 3-5 years of use, especially with sun exposure and washing. Columbia has not disclosed whether legacy PFOS/PFOA or modern fluorocarbon alternatives are used; degradation may release coating particles or residues.

20/ 100
💨

Off-gassing from synthetic materials and adhesives

New synthetic duffels often emit mild VOCs (volatile organic compounds) from polyester, nylon, and seam adhesives for the first few weeks. Odor typically dissipates with airing; risk is low but detectable in enclosed spaces like vehicles.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Azo dyes in polyester-nylon blend

No product-specific recalls or testing reports document azo dye concerns for Columbia Landroamer fabrics. Standard polyester and nylon used in major outdoor brands typically meet established safety thresholds for azo compounds.

95/ 100
✅

Antimony in polyester

Polyester can be manufactured with antimony trioxide as a catalyst; no evidence exists that Columbia uses elevated levels or failed safety testing. This hazard is present in most synthetic fiber duffels at negligible risk unless fabric is ingested.

95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Formaldehyde-based resins are sometimes used in wrinkle-resistance or fabric stiffening; no recalls or documented issues exist for this specific model or Columbia's standard duffel finishing.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

Columbia Sportswear has not taken a prominent public stance on PFAS elimination or disclosure, unlike some outdoor brands (e.g., Patagonia, Arc'teryx) that have committed to phasing out legacy fluorocarbon treatments. The company has not independently certified this product under standards like OEKO-TEX or bluesign, which would signal more rigorous chemical screening. No product-specific recalls or documented safety controversies for this duffel model are on record.

How it compares in its category

Large duffle bags in this price and brand tier almost universally use water-repellent coating-coated synthetics; the Landroamer is typical in that respect. Some specialty outdoor brands now offer non-fluorinated water-resistant alternatives, but these remain less common and often cost more. Columbia's option represents the mainstream choice for performance duffels, where water shedding is prioritized over chemical disclosure.

If you buy it

Avoid machine washing at high temperatures or using harsh detergents, as these can degrade the water-repellent coating and potentially increase leaching of coating residues. Do not dry-clean or expose to direct high heat (e.g., car trunks in sun). Store in a cool, dry place; inspect the exterior periodically for peeling, flaking, or coating wear, which signals end-of-life. If you have concerns about PFAS exposure, contact Columbia customer service directly to request specific water-repellent coating chemistry data before purchase.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Columbia has made a specific claim

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Waterproof Outdoor Gear Storage Bags

REI Co-op Trailgate Gear Bin Green 140 L

REI Co-op

Trailgate Gear Bin Green 140 L

65GoodPFAS grade
  • Polypropylene storage bin, no water-resistant coating mentioned
  • UV degradation and additive leaching

3 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

Marmot Tool Box

Marmot

Tool Box

65GoodPFAS grade
  • Nylon, polyester, cotton blend; details unspecified
  • Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from polyester and nylon manufacturing

5 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

Patagonia Disperser Roll Top Pack 40L

Patagonia

Disperser Roll Top Pack 40L

45PoorPFAS grade
  • Recycled polyester with water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • PFAS

4 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

More waterproof outdoor gear storage bags grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.