PFAS30/ 100Poor
Overall18/ 100Bad
Estée Lauder Estee Lauder Double Wear Stay in Place Longwear Matte Foundation

Estée Lauder · Makeup

Estée Lauder Estee Lauder Double Wear Stay in Place Longwear Matte Foundation

Poor

Waterproof cosmetic foundation; PFAS risk unclear without disclosure.

Verdict · SkipWaterproof foundation with undisclosed PFAS risk; standard cosmetic hazards manageable with proper use and patch testing.

Double Wear is a long-wear waterproof foundation; Estée Lauder does not publicly disclose PFAS ingredients or absence. Waterproofing agents in cosmetics may contain PFAS, but ingredient list alone cannot confirm.

The better-graded swap

Charlotte Tilbury Award-winning Complexion Trio

Charlotte Tilbury

Charlotte Tilbury Award-winning Complexion Trio

75/100 safety

75Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Liquid foundation with silicone base, waterproof polymers

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Estée Lauder Estee Lauder Matte Foundation is made of, ingredients and materials

Double Wear is a silicone-based liquid foundation with waterproof polymers designed for long wear. Silicones themselves are inert and generally well-tolerated, but waterproof formulas often rely on fluorinated compounds (PFAS) to create water and sweat resistance. The product contains synthetic pigments and preservatives typical of prestige foundations, which carry minor contamination risks if sourcing is not controlled.

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Waterproof foundations commonly use fluorinated compounds; Estée Lauder does not disclose PFAS presence or absence in Double Wear, leaving status unconfirmed but likely given the product category and claimed water resistance.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Double Wear contains fragrance additives; undisclosed fragrance components may trigger contact dermatitis or sensitization, particularly in users with sensitive skin or prior cosmetic reactions.

70/ 100
⚠️

Skin barrier irritation from silicone accumulation

Long-wear silicone foundations can trap bacteria and sebum if not thoroughly removed daily, leading to acne, milia, or barrier dysfunction in predisposed users; risk is usage-dependent, not product-inherent.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

⛏️

Heavy metals

No recalls or regulatory actions on record for this product. Prestige brands typically source certified pigments, but contamination in iron oxides or lakes is a category-wide concern not specifically documented here.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Formulations of this age and category may contain preservative systems that release trace formaldehyde; no specific data on Double Wear, but patch testing will reveal individual tolerance.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Estée Lauder does not publicly disclose PFAS content or commit to phase-out timelines, placing it in the silent majority of prestige cosmetics brands on this issue. The company has no known major recalls for this product line and maintains standard cosmetic safety compliance. However, transparency about waterproofing chemistry remains absent, making independent verification of fluorinated additives impossible for consumers.

How it compares in its category

Double Wear sits in the premium, long-wear segment where PFAS use in waterproof formulas is common industry practice. Brands with explicit PFAS-free claims (e.g., some clean beauty lines) exist but often sacrifice wear time or water resistance. Most mainstream prestige foundations at this price point offer similar or equivalent transparency gaps around waterproofing chemistry.

If you buy it

Perform a 24-48 hour patch test on jaw or behind ear before full face application to screen for irritation or allergic reaction. Remove with proper makeup remover to avoid skin barrier stress; silicone-based formulas require oil-based or micellar cleansing. Store away from direct heat or sunlight. Replace annually or when the product separates, thickens, or develops off-odors, as preservative efficacy declines over time.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Estée Lauder has made a specific claim

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Estée Lauder Estee Lauder Double Wear Stay in Place Longwear Matte Foundation?

  • water, hyaluronic acid, glycerin, pigments, emollients
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • 1,4-dioxane contamination from emulsifiers

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Anastasia Beverly Hills

86 Products

75ExcellentPFAS grade
  • pigments, oils, waxes, polymers (standard cosmetic formulations)
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Fragrance allergens or 1,4-dioxane in fragrances

Anastasia Beverly Hills

Beauty Makeup

75ExcellentPFAS grade
  • pigments, waxes, oils, talc, mica
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Fragrance allergens

More makeup grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.