PFAS15/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Farberware Professional Kitchen Utensil and Gadget Set with Crock

Farberware · Non-Stick Kitchen Gadgets

Farberware Professional Kitchen Utensil and Gadget Set with Crock

Bad

Avoid until Farberware reveals the coating type.

Verdict · SkipMixed-material utensil set with unspecified coatings and silent PFAS stance; coating degradation risk and lack of transparency warrant cautious use and monitoring.

Farberware will not say what coatings are on these utensils. You cannot evaluate PFAS risk without knowing the material specifics.

The better-graded swap

Our Place Utensil Essentials 6-Piece Silicone Utensil Set

Our Place

Our Place Utensil Essentials 6-Piece Silicone Utensil Set

90/100 safety

90Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Mixed utensil set, coating unspecified

Lab data

No public lab test

Is Farberware Professional Kitchen Utensil non-toxic? What it is made of

This Farberware set bundles multiple utensil types (likely silicone, plastic, and stainless steel handles) with a ceramic or stoneware crock. The critical unknown is the exact coating or finish on non-metal components. Farberware's product pages historically do not specify whether utensil coatings contain Teflon-type coating (Teflon) or other heat-sensitive polymers, or whether the crock uses lead-safe glazes. Mixed-material sets obscure individual composition, making batch consistency difficult to verify.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Non-stick, chemistry undisclosed

Marketed as non-stick without stating the coating chemistry.

60/ 100
♾️

Teflon-type coating fume risk (if coating present)

Farberware does not disclose whether utensil coatings use Teflon-type coating or Teflon-type coating-free polymers. If Teflon-type coating is present and utensils reach 500F+, they can release toxic fumes. Brand silence on this is the primary concern.

70/ 100
⏳

Coating degradation and leaching

User reports and online reviews of Farberware utensil sets note peeling or flaking coatings after 1-2 years of use. Degraded coatings can leach microparticles and undisclosed polymers into food. No formal recall has been issued, but this is a documented failure mode.

45/ 100
🍼

BPA & bisphenols

If utensil handles are plastic (common in budget sets), composition is undisclosed. Older Farberware products have been criticized for unlabeled plastic; newer batches may comply with BPA-free standards, but brand confirmation is absent.

Source, FDA ↗
70/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding from wear

Mixed-material utensil sets with coated or plastic components are prone to microplastic release during normal use and cleaning. Farberware's history of coating durability issues increases this risk over the product's lifespan.

20/ 100

What’s reassuring

🧠

Lead

No recalls or independent testing of Farberware ceramic crocks for lead/cadmium leaching have been made public. Consumer-grade ceramics in the US are subject to FDA limits, but Farberware does not provide glaze composition or third-party test results. Risk is low but unverified.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

Farberware is a mass-market cookware brand owned by Groupe SEB and has no published PFAS policy or third-party safety certifications on file. The brand has not issued recalls specific to PFAS or coating leaching in utensil lines in recent public records, but this absence does not confirm safety. Farberware's transparency on material sourcing and regulatory compliance is minimal compared to premium brands, and customer service inquiries about coating composition often go unanswered.

How it compares in its category

Utensil sets from budget-tier brands typically prioritize cost over material disclosure, placing Farberware in the lower tier of transparency. Comparable alternatives from OXO, Oxo Good Grips, or uncoated stainless-steel-only sets offer clearer composition labeling. Ceramic crocks are standard low-risk storage; the utensil components are the variable. Most kitchen utensil sets in this price range lack independent safety testing.

If you buy it

Avoid heating utensils above 400F (especially if coated) and do not use in ovens unless explicitly rated. Hand-wash to prevent coating degradation from dishwasher friction and temperature cycling. Inspect utensils monthly for chips, discoloration, or peel; discard if the coating shows wear. Store the crock away from direct heat and check the interior glaze for crazing or glaze loss before first use.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Farberware has made a specific claim

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Non-Stick Kitchen Gadgets

Our Place Utensil Essentials 6-Piece Silicone Utensil Set

Our Place

Utensil Essentials 6-Piece Silicone Utensil Set

90ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Silicone utensils, no coating
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Microplastic generation

2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

Our Place Essential Utensil Set

Our Place

Essential Utensil Set

90ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Stainless steel utensils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Nickel leaching from stainless steel

2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

Our Place Utensil Essentials Set

Our Place

Utensil Essentials Set

90ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Stainless steel utensils, material unclear
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Handle material degradation (if present)

2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

More non-stick kitchen gadgets grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.