Fructis Sleek & Shine Fortifying Conditioner
Lower PFAS concern for a rinse-off hair conditioner. No known triggers.
This rinse-off cosmetic has no documented PFAS-triggering features like waterproofing, stain resistance, or nonstick coatings. The formula does not publicly contain Teflon-family coating.
We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade
Material
aqueous liquid conditioner; no water-repellent coating or nonstick coating
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
You may also be interested in
Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.
- polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial growth in spent cartridges
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Aquasure
Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System
- RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Avocado
Vegan Mattress
- organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Heavy metals
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
What Fructis Sleek & Shine Conditioner is made of, ingredients and materials
Fructis Sleek & Shine is an aqueous liquid conditioner containing water, silicones (cyclomethicone, dimethicone), emollients, and plant-derived fragrance compounds. The product is designed to rinse completely from hair, meaning systemic absorption of ingredients is minimal compared to leave-on products. Silicone polymers used in conditioners are chemically stable and do not degrade into smaller harmful molecules during normal use.
What’s concerning
Category baseline
The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.
1,4-dioxane (secondary contamination)
1,4-dioxane can occur as a byproduct in surfactant and emulsifier manufacturing. Garnier does not publicly disclose testing for this contaminant in Fructis lines. Regulatory limits in finished cosmetics exist in some jurisdictions (e.g., <30 ppm in Canada); FDA does not set a limit but lists it as a concern. Rinse-off use substantially reduces exposure risk.
Fragrance allergens
Product lists 'fragrance' as a proprietary blend without full ingredient disclosure, common industry practice. Potential allergens include limonene, linalool, and other botanical extracts that can trigger contact dermatitis in sensitized individuals. Risk is low for scalp use but higher if conditioner contacts facial skin or eyes.
What’s reassuring
Base material not linked to PFAS
The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.
Formaldehyde / VOCs
No formaldehyde donors (DMDM hydantoin, diazolidinyl urea) are listed on publicly available ingredient data for this product. Garnier typically uses preservative systems with lower concern in mainstream conditioners. Risk tier remains low unless hidden in 'fragrance' component, which is unlikely for this established brand.
Source, ATSDR ↗Heavy metals
Conditioners are not heavily pigmented products; this formulation is clear/translucent. Lead, cadmium, and arsenic contamination is a documented risk primarily in makeup and pigmented cosmetics, not in clear aqueous conditioners. No recalls or regulatory action on record for Fructis conditioners targeting metal contamination.
Source, FDA ↗Microplastics
This conditioner is a liquid formulation without exfoliating or textured beads. Microplastic risk applies to solid scrubs and some toothpastes, not to standard liquid conditioners. Dimethicone and cyclomethicone are dissolved polymers that rinse away completely and are not classified as microplastics.
Source, EPA ↗How is this PFAS grade calculated?
The brand's record and disclosure
Garnier publishes ingredient lists and Safety Data Sheets but does not prominently disclose independent third-party certifications (such as EWG Verified or Cradle to Cradle) for this line. The brand has no major regulatory actions or product recalls on record for Fructis conditioners in the United States. Garnier has not made a public commitment specifically addressing PFAS phase-out in rinse-off products, though this category poses lower contamination risk than water-repellent or nonstick applications.
How it compares in its category
This product sits in the mainstream mass-market conditioner segment. It lacks premium certifications (organic, sulfate-free claims are marketing, not third-party verified) but also avoids some novel polymer or preservative choices that pose niche risks. Comparable alternatives from same brand and competitors show similar silicone and fragrance-based formulations; rinse-off nature is standard across category and removes most residual risk at point of use.
If you buy it
Use as directed, apply to damp hair, leave for 1-2 minutes, rinse thoroughly. No heat application or skin contact required. Store at room temperature away from direct sunlight. Replace when empty (typical 3-6 month usage for shoulder-length hair). If scalp irritation or allergic reaction occurs (itching, redness), discontinue and rinse thoroughly; contact dermatologist if persistent. Keep out of reach of children.
What is not known about PFAS in this product?
- Basis
- Model estimate, 78% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- Garnier Fructis has made none
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Fructis Sleek & Shine Fortifying Conditioner?
- Water, conditioning agents, organic plant extracts
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Heavy metals
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
- water-based conditioner, typical surfactants and botanical extracts
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Heavy metals
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
More conditioner grades
How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.