PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall12/ 100Bad
Gregory Inertia 24 H2O Backpack

Gregory · Waterproof Outdoor Gear Storage Bags

Gregory Inertia 24 H2O Backpack

Bad

Water-resistant backpack. No PFAS disclosure from Gregory.

Verdict · SkipNylon backpack with water-repellent coating poses possible PFAS exposure; no brand disclosure. Other textile hazards minimal.

Gregory Inertia uses water-repellent coating-treated nylon for water resistance, a common application of PFAS coatings. Brand provides no PFAS information or certifications.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nylon with water-repellent coating water-repellent coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What Gregory Inertia 24 H2O Backpack is made of, ingredients and materials

The Inertia 24 H2O uses nylon fabric with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating applied to the exterior. water-repellent coating coatings on outdoor gear historically relied on fluorochemical compounds (PFAS family) to achieve water shedding; many brands have not disclosed what chemistry they currently use. Nylon itself is a stable synthetic polymer with low leaching risk under normal use, but the surface treatment is the primary chemical concern for this product.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Water-repellent textiles commonly contain PFAS. Gregory's water-repellent coating chemistry is undisclosed; composition cannot be confirmed as PFAS-free or PFAS-containing based on available public information.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100
⏳

water-repellent coating degradation over time

Water-repellent coating treatments on nylon are temporary and degrade through washing, sunlight, and wear. As the coating wears away, residual fluorochemical particles may shed into the environment or contact skin during use.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No established reports of formaldehyde resin use in Gregory nylon backpacks. Nylon does not typically require formaldehyde-based wrinkle-resistance finishes as wool or cotton does.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100
✅

Azo dyes in nylon coloring

No specific recalls or test results identifying banned azo dyes in Gregory Inertia packs. Commercial nylon backpacks from established brands generally comply with restrictive substance limits, though full dye chemistry is rarely disclosed.

95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

No documented issues with cadmium, lead, or other heavy metals in Gregory backpack dyes. Pigments in technical nylon are generally tested for heavy metal content by major outdoor brands.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

Gregory does not publicly disclose the chemistry of its water-repellent coating or commit to PFAS-free formulations. The brand has not published a restricted substances list or transparency report specific to water-repellent treatments. Without official disclosure, the composition of the Inertia 24's water-resistance layer remains unknown and cannot be verified as PFAS-free or PFAS-containing. This silence is common in the outdoor gear industry but limits informed purchasing.

How it compares in its category

Most nylon backpacks in the 20-30 liter range use similar water-repellent coating coatings with unknown or mixed chemical profiles. Brands like Patagonia and Arc'teryx have published stricter chemical guidelines, though even their disclosure remains limited. The Inertia 24 is competitively positioned on durability and design; the chemical risk profile is typical for mid-range outdoor packs, neither better nor worse than comparable Gregory or competitor models without explicit PFAS commitment.

If you buy it

Wash the backpack separately from other textiles in cool water to minimize any potential leaching of coating residues. Avoid high-heat drying or direct sunlight for extended periods, which can accelerate coating breakdown. Inspect seams and coated areas annually for degradation; re-proof with aftermarket water-repellent coating products only if the original coating visibly wears away. Storage in a cool, dry space extends the life of both the nylon and the coating.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Gregory has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Waterproof Outdoor Gear Storage Bags

REI Co-op Trailgate Gear Bin Green 140 L

REI Co-op

Trailgate Gear Bin Green 140 L

65GoodPFAS grade
  • Polypropylene storage bin, no water-resistant coating mentioned
  • UV degradation and additive leaching

3 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

Marmot Tool Box

Marmot

Tool Box

65GoodPFAS grade
  • Nylon, polyester, cotton blend; details unspecified
  • Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from polyester and nylon manufacturing

5 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

Patagonia Disperser Roll Top Pack 40L

Patagonia

Disperser Roll Top Pack 40L

45PoorPFAS grade
  • Recycled polyester with water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • PFAS

4 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

More waterproof outdoor gear storage bags grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.