PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall63/ 100Good
Hairstory New Wash Deep Clean Cleansing & Conditioning Cream

Hairstory · Conditioner

Hairstory New Wash Deep Clean Cleansing & Conditioning Cream

Excellent

Lower PFAS concern for a rinse-off hair cleanser, though brand lacks disclosure.

Verdict · BuyRinse-off hair product with no established hazards in formulation; PFAS uncertainty is low-priority for this category; brand transparency could improve.

This rinse-off cleansing cream has no waterproofing, stain resistance, or nonstick claims. The brand makes no PFAS disclosures or holds certifications.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

Cleansing cream (water, oils, emulsifiers)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Hairstory New Wash Deep Clean Cream is made of, ingredients and materials

New Wash is a water-based cleansing cream combining oils, emulsifiers, and conditioning agents rather than traditional surfactants. The rinse-off formulation means exposure time is brief and systemic absorption is minimal compared to leave-on products. Creamy texture relies on emulsifiers to suspend oil in water; none of the publicized ingredients are flagged in major safety databases. No coal-tar dyes, formaldehyde releasers, or heavy metal pigments are listed on the label.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🏷️

Fragrance allergens (undisclosed components)

Hairstory lists 'fragrance' but does not break down specific scent ingredients. Some individuals with sensitive scalp may react to fragrance compounds, though rinse-off nature limits exposure risk.

70/ 100
⚠️

Emulsifier skin sensitivity

Creaming agents required for this formulation (typical, polysorbates or cetyl alcohol derivatives) may irritate sensitive scalp in rare cases. No specific adverse reports are on record for this product.

70/ 100
⚠️

Microbes if container opened/resealed repeatedly

Cream-based products have higher bacterial growth risk than gels if contaminated during use. Avoid reintroducing water or using wet applicators; replace every 12 months.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
✅

1,4-dioxane contamination (manufacturing byproduct)

No independent testing or brand disclosure confirms presence or absence. Rinse-off products pose lower systemic exposure than leave-ons, but lack of transparency on manufacturing standards leaves this unverified.

95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Hairstory publishes full ingredient lists and does not claim organic or dermatologist certification. The brand has not issued transparency reports on PFAS, heavy metals, or manufacturing standards, and no recalls or safety advisories are on record for this product. Marketing emphasizes scalp health and minimal ingredients but lacks third-party testing disclosure. No established controversies or recalls exist in public databases.

How it compares in its category

Conditioning creams sit in a lower-risk tier than intensive treatments or color products because they are rinsed away after minutes. New Wash avoids the talc contamination risk of powder-based conditioners and lacks the flame retardant concerns of solid bar formulations. Compared to sulfate-free alternatives, it offers similar rinse-off safety with less industry scrutiny; it is not more hazardous but also not more independently verified.

If you buy it

Use as directed and rinse thoroughly to minimize any residual contact. Store below 25°C to prevent emulsion breakdown, which could alter texture but does not create toxic compounds. If scalp irritation develops, discontinue use. Product is stable under normal bathroom storage and does not require special handling.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Hairstory has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Hairstory New Wash Deep Clean Cleansing & Conditioning Cream?

Avalon Organics

Biotin B-Complex Thickening Conditioner

85ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Water, conditioning agents, organic plant extracts
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Heavy metals

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avalon Organics

Rosemary Volumizing Conditioner

85ExcellentPFAS grade
  • water-based conditioner, typical surfactants and botanical extracts
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Heavy metals

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

More conditioner grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.