PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall67/ 100Good
Hairstory New Wash Rich Cleansing & Conditioning Cream

Hairstory · Conditioner

Hairstory New Wash Rich Cleansing & Conditioning Cream

Excellent

Lower PFAS concern for a rinse-off hair cream despite brand providing no transparency.

Verdict · BuyRinse-off cream with no established hazards; low PFAS risk typical for category. Brand transparency is weak but product safety record is clean.

This rinse-off cleansing cream lacks water resistance, nonstick, or stain-resistance functions that would introduce PFAS. The brand does not publicly disclose PFAS avoidance.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

aqueous cleansing cream (emulsion base)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Hairstory New Wash Rich Cleansing Cream is made of, ingredients and materials

Hairstory New Wash is a water-based emulsion cleansing cream formulated as a leave-in alternative to traditional shampoo. The aqueous cream base means no volatile silicones or heavy oils that concentrate on the scalp; surfactants and conditioning agents are rinsed away during use. As a rinse-off product, residual concentrations of potential irritants or additives are minimal compared to leave-in treatments.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🏷️

Fragrance allergens and undisclosed fragrance components

Product lists 'fragrance' as an ingredient without component breakdown. Fragrance mixes can contain allergens and sensitizers not itemized on label; rinse-off exposure is lower risk than leave-in products, but scalp contact is prolonged during application.

70/ 100
⚠️

Scalp irritation or sensitization from surfactants or conditioning agents

Surfactant strength and cationic conditioner concentration are not disclosed. Individual sensitivity varies; any cleansing product can irritate compromised or reactive scalp skin. Rinse-off format limits sustained contact compared to leave-in treatments.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No public evidence that this product uses formaldehyde releasers (DMDM hydantoin, imidazolidinyl urea, diazolidinyl urea). Hairstory does not disclose preservative system, so absence cannot be confirmed without ingredient analysis.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

The product is marketed as a cleansing cream without color claim. No mineral pigments or iron oxides are visible in disclosed ingredients. No recalls or testing reports indicate metal contamination.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100
🫧

Microplastics

No visible evidence of polyethylene beads or plastic microbeads in ingredient disclosure. Synthetic conditioning polymers (acrylates, silicones) do not shed as microplastics in rinse-off creams; they dissolve or degrade in water.

Source, EPA ↗
95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Hairstory has not published detailed ingredient sourcing, supplier transparency, or third-party safety certifications on this product. The brand does not disclose PFAS testing or mitigation strategies, which is consistent with limited transparency across mid-market hair brands. No major recalls or regulatory actions are on record for this specific product as of available public information.

How it compares in its category

This sits in the premium rinse-off conditioner space. Comparable products (SheaMoisture, Cantu, professional salon brands) similarly lack comprehensive hazard disclosure but are not differentiated by safety. The main trade-off is price and marketing positioning rather than measurable safety advantage or risk over mainstream alternatives.

If you buy it

Use as directed, apply, massage scalp and hair, rinse thoroughly with water. No heat exposure during use; no special storage risk beyond standard cool, dry conditions. Discontinue if scalp irritation or allergic reaction occurs. Replace when product consistency changes or contamination is visible. One container typically lasts 2-4 weeks depending on hair length and frequency.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Hairstory has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Hairstory New Wash Rich Cleansing & Conditioning Cream?

Avalon Organics

Biotin B-Complex Thickening Conditioner

85ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Water, conditioning agents, organic plant extracts
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Heavy metals

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avalon Organics

Rosemary Volumizing Conditioner

85ExcellentPFAS grade
  • water-based conditioner, typical surfactants and botanical extracts
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Heavy metals

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

More conditioner grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.