PFAS15/ 100Bad
Overall7/ 100Bad
HexClad Hybrid Pots & Pans Set

HexClad · Cookware

HexClad Hybrid Pots & Pans Set

Bad

Skip until HexClad discloses coating chemistry or provides PFAS testing.

Verdict: SkipHexClad's undisclosed hybrid coating raises PFAS concerns, but non-PFAS hazards are minimal if used properly and below temperature limits.

HexClad uses a proprietary hybrid coating but does not publicly reveal its chemical makeup or make PFAS-free claims. No third-party verification is available. Choose cast iron, stainless steel, or brands with explicit PFAS-free proof instead.

The safe swap

Scanpan Ceramic Titanium

Scanpan

Scanpan Ceramic Titanium

90/100 safety

90Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Hybrid nonstick coating (composition unspecified by brand)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Non-stick, chemistry undisclosed

Advertised as non-stick but coating type is not explained.

60/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cookware is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

70/ 100
♾️

Teflon-type coating/Teflon-family coating fume risk (nonstick coating)

HexClad has not disclosed whether the hybrid coating contains Teflon-type coating or other Teflon-family coating. If Teflon-type coating is present, overheating (above 500F or preheating empty) can release polymer fume inhalation hazard (Teflon-type coating fume fever). No fume incidents have been documented for this brand, but inability to confirm coating type prevents firm risk assessment.

70/ 100
🍂

Coating degradation and flaking over time

All nonstick coatings degrade with use and dishwashing. Once HexClad coating degrades, flakes may shed into food. No documented cases exist for this specific product, but users should monitor for visible wear and replace cookware if the cooking surface becomes rough or visibly compromised.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Aluminum leaching from core material

HexClad cookware has an aluminum core, but stainless steel cladding and the intact nonstick/cooking surface separate food from aluminum. Under normal cooking conditions and pH (neutral to slightly acidic foods), leaching is not expected. Damage to the exterior cladding or interior surface could theoretically expose aluminum; this risk is minimal with proper care.

95/ 100
🧠

Lead

HexClad cookware uses stainless steel handles and trim without visible enamel or glaze. No contamination has been reported or documented. Standard manufacturing in the US and compliance with FDA cookware regulations makes this hazard unlikely.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

Off-gassing or VOC emissions from coating

New cookware may have a slight chemical odor on first use, typical of all nonstick cookware during initial cure. Adequate ventilation during first few uses mitigates this. No persistent VOC off-gassing has been documented for HexClad products in available sources.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

HexClad markets a 'hybrid' nonstick coating combining a hexagonal stainless steel cooking surface with nonstick properties, but the brand has not publicly disclosed the chemical composition of the nonstick layer. This opacity is the core issue: without knowing whether the coating contains Teflon-type coating (Teflon), other Teflon-family coating, or silicone-based alternatives, users cannot fully assess fume or leaching risk. The cookware is typically constructed with aluminum cores and stainless steel surfaces, materials that do not leach significantly under normal cooking conditions.

The brand's record and disclosure

HexClad has been silent on PFAS content and coating chemistry despite industry-wide questions about nonstick coatings since the 2000s. The brand does not advertise PFAS-free status or third-party testing results for coating safety. No major recalls or health controversies have been publicly documented for HexClad cookware, but the lack of transparency on a safety-critical material is a notable gap compared to competitors (e.g., GreenPan, Our Place) that actively disclose Teflon-type coating-free or PFOA-free formulations.

How it compares in its category

HexClad occupies a premium mid-range position. Traditional Teflon-type coating nonstick cookware (T-fal, Calphalon conventional) typically discloses Teflon-type coating and PFOA content; ceramic alternatives (GreenPan, Caraway) market PFAS avoidance explicitly. HexClad's hybrid design offers durability and heat tolerance (up to 500 degrees Fahrenheit claimed) that exceeds soft ceramic, but the undisclosed coating chemistry makes direct safety comparison difficult. Cast iron and stainless steel alternatives avoid nonstick chemistry altogether but sacrifice ease of use.

If you buy it

Never exceed 500 degrees Fahrenheit; avoid preheating empty pans and prolonged high heat to reduce any potential for coating fume release or degradation. Hand wash rather than dishwasher to preserve coating integrity over time. Inspect the cooking surface regularly for peeling, chipping, or discoloration; replace cookware if damage is visible. Do not contact HexClad for a safety data sheet on the coating unless you are comfortable with a non-answer; if transparency becomes a dealbreaker, consider a ceramic or cast-iron alternative.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
HexClad has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Cookware

GreenPan Ceramic Non-stick

GreenPan

Ceramic Non-stick

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade78Excellent

Coating degradation and integrity loss

Limited concern

70
🔩

Aluminum leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microparticle shedding from coating

Limited concern

70

Low risk, safe to use.

Risky category by default

Scanpan Ceramic Titanium

Scanpan

Ceramic Titanium

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
🔩

Ceramic coating degradation and aluminum leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic or particulate shedding from coating

Limited concern

70

Low risk, safe to use.

Risky category by default

GreenPan Chatham Ceramic Nonstick Frypan Set

GreenPan

Chatham Ceramic Nonstick Frypan Set

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent

Ceramic coating degradation over time

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Thermal shock and handle integrity

Limited concern

70

Low risk, safe to use.

Risky category by default

More cookware grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.