PFAS50/ 100Good
Overall42/ 100Poor
HOYA HD Antistatic UV Filter

Hoya · Waterproof Camera & Lens Protection Cases

HOYA HD Antistatic UV Filter

Good

Optical glass with antistatic and UV coatings of undisclosed chemistry.

Verdict · SkipOptical glass substrate is inherently stable; coating composition unspecified but antistatic+UV coatings pose minimal consumer risk in normal use.

The optical glass base is not a material linked to PFAS. The antistatic and UV filter coatings are recorded but their chemistry is not stated. Hoya has no PFAS statement on record for this product.

The better-graded swap

K&F Concept Waterproof Case for GoPro Hero 13 Black

GoPro

K&F Concept Waterproof Case for GoPro Hero 13 Black

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

optical glass with antistatic and UV filter coatings

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What HOYA HD Antistatic UV Filter is made of, ingredients and materials

This is a camera lens filter made from optical-grade glass with two functional coatings, an antistatic layer (likely silica-based) to repel dust and fingerprints, and a UV absorption layer to block ultraviolet light. Optical glass itself is chemically inert and poses no leaching risk. The coatings are applied in microscopic quantities and remain fixed to the glass surface during normal handling and cleaning.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Unknown / proprietary coating

A coating is recorded with no disclosed chemistry.

75/ 100
🍳

Heavy metals

Some UV and antistatic coatings may include trace metals (e.g., titanium, cerium, or rare earths) but composition is proprietary and unconfirmed for Hoya products. No evidence of migration or health impact in normal camera use; concern is theoretical only.

Source, FDA ↗
70/ 100
⚠️

Glass fragmentation hazard

If dropped or struck, the filter may shatter, creating sharp glass fragments. This is a physical safety concern unrelated to chemistry but relevant to product handling, especially in equipment-intensive environments.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Coating leachability or degradation

Antistatic and UV coatings are applied at microgram levels and chemically bonded to glass. No mechanism for release into food, water, or skin during normal optical use; coatings are exterior-facing only and do not contact user directly.

95/ 100
✅

Volatile organic compound (VOC) off-gassing

Optical coatings are cured during manufacturing and do not off-gas during storage or use. The product is fully stabilized before sale and poses no inhalation risk.

95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Hoya is a major Japanese optical manufacturer with decades of industry presence but provides no public material safety data sheets or chemical disclosure for consumer filter products. The company has not faced significant product safety recalls in the photography filter market. Transparency on coating composition and manufacturing is minimal, which is typical for optical coatings but limits independent verification.

How it compares in its category

Optical filters across all major brands (Canon, Nikon, Zeiss, B+W) use similar glass-substrate-plus-coating designs with minimal disclosed differences. Hoya filters are competitively positioned and do not carry known hazard flags relative to competitors. The antistatic feature is a practical upgrade over uncoated glass but does not introduce chemical hazards beyond standard UV filter designs.

If you buy it

Clean with lens-specific microfiber cloths and approved lens cleaning solutions; avoid abrasive materials that could damage coatings. The filter requires no special storage beyond dry conditions and protection from impact. Normal photography use (no heat exposure, no contact with skin or food) carries no identified risks. Replace if surface is visibly scratched or coating flakes, though this is rare under standard handling.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 62% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Hoya has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

What are the PFAS-free alternatives to HOYA HD Antistatic UV Filter?

B+W UV Haze 010 Filter

B+W

UV Haze 010 Filter

85ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Optical glass lens with multi-coated optical surfaces
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • No PFAS statement found from the brand
Best Samsung Galaxy S25/S24/S23 Ultra Lens

Samsung

Best Samsung Galaxy S25/S24/S23 Ultra Lens

85ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Glass lens (borosilicate or soda-lime glass)
  • Optical coating degradation

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Sigma 58mm WR Protector Filter

Sigma

58mm WR Protector Filter

85ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Optical glass, aluminum frame, non-coated optical surfaces
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Optical glass fragility and sharp edges

More waterproof camera & lens protection cases grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.