Hume Supernatural Mixed + Duo Deodorant
Lower concern deodorant, no PFAS disclosure issues identified.
Hume Supernatural deodorant appears a conventional cosmetic with no known PFAS treatment. Brand discloses nothing about PFAS; product composition is not publicly detailed enough to confirm or rule out all additives.
We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade
Material
Deodorant, presumed talc/mineral/starch base
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
You may also be interested in
Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.
Aqua Pure
3M Aqua-Pure AP802B Whole House Filter Housing
- polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial growth in spent cartridges
3 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.
Aquasure
Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System
- RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters
4 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.
Avocado
Vegan Mattress
- organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Heavy metals
2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.
What Hume Supernatural Mixed + Duo Deodorant is made of, ingredients and materials
Hume Supernatural Mixed + Duo appears to use a talc or mineral/starch base typical of natural deodorants, avoiding aluminum compounds found in antiperspirants. The 'mixed' formulation likely blends mineral powders (mica, zinc oxide, or magnesium carbonate) with plant-derived or synthetic binders. This category avoids the resin-based coatings and heavy metal pigments that plague some conventional cosmetics, though mineral bases can still harbor trace contaminants if sourcing is uncontrolled.
What’s concerning
Category baseline
The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.
Talc contamination and asbestos risk
If the 'mineral' base includes any talc component, there is a potential for asbestos trace contamination, though modern cosmetic-grade talc is subject to FDA oversight. Hume's ingredient list and sourcing transparency are not publicly detailed, so confirmation is not possible from available information.
Fragrance allergens and undisclosed fragrance constituents
The product name 'Supernatural' suggests fragrance inclusion, likely from essential oils or fragrance blends. Hume does not disclose fragrance constituents, which can include skin sensitizers (limonene, linalool, cinnamyl alcohol) affecting individuals with contact dermatitis.
What’s reassuring
Base material not linked to PFAS
The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.
Lead
Mineral-base deodorants carry lower inherent risk than pigmented cosmetics, but no published testing or certifications confirm heavy metal absence in Hume's formulation. Sourcing of mica, talc substitute, or zinc oxide remains unaudited.
Source, ATSDR ↗Formaldehyde / VOCs
No established reports of formaldehyde-releasing preservatives in Hume formulations, and mineral-base products typically rely on physical preservation rather than chemical releasers. However, ingredient transparency is limited.
Source, ATSDR ↗1,4-dioxane as manufacturing residue
Mineral deodorants carry lower theoretical risk of 1,4-dioxane contamination compared to emulsified or ethoxylated formulations, but no third-party testing confirms absence in this product.
The full breakdown
The brand's record and disclosure
Hume maintains a 'silent' PFAS stance with no public commitment or transparency statement on PFAS avoidance, which is typical for smaller natural/indie cosmetics brands. No major product recalls, formaldehyde releaser complaints, or heavy metal contamination reports are established in public records for this brand. The brand does not appear to hold third-party certifications (EWG, USDA Organic, or Leaping Bunny) based on available information, limiting independent verification of ingredient claims.
How it compares in its category
Mineral deodorants occupy a middle ground, lower concern than aluminum antiperspirants but less predictable than brands with full transparency and third-party testing. Hume's formulation avoids the talc-asbestos contamination risk that has dogged legacy brands, but mineral-base alternatives vary widely in purity. Compared to mainstream brands, natural deodorants of this type typically have lower fragrance allergen density but offer no inherent superiority in bacterial performance.
If you buy it
Apply sparingly to clean, dry skin to avoid buildup and skin irritation. If you develop rashes, itching, or discoloration after 2-4 weeks, discontinue and patch-test with a fragrance-free alternative to isolate the cause. Replace every 12-18 months or when paste consistency degrades; mineral bases absorb moisture and can become tacky or caked. Store in a cool, dry place away from direct heat or humidity, as mineral powders can clump and lose effectiveness when exposed to moisture.
What we don’t know
- Basis
- Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- Hume has made none
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
Better-graded alternatives in Deodorant
Primally Pure
Baking Soda Free Deodorant
- mineral-based powder blend (arrowroot, magnesium hydroxide, mica)
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Skin irritation from magnesium hydroxide alkalinity
Each & Every
The Mini Edit
- cosmetic formulations, primary ingredients listed
- A third party reports verifying it as PFAS-free
- Fragrance allergens (natural essential oils)
2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.
Primally Pure
UNSCENTED SENSITIVE DEODORANT Primally Pure Skincare
- natural mineral powders, plant-based actives, beeswax
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Beeswax purity and contamination
2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.
More deodorant grades
How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.