PFAS15/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
imusa 8" nonstick skillet saute pan

Imusa · Cookware

imusa 8" nonstick skillet saute pan

Bad

Coating composition undisclosed, Imusa does not address PFAS.

Verdict: SkipImusa's nonstick coating type is undisclosed; Teflon-type coating fume risk and coating durability unknown. Use cautiously with proper ventilation and temperature control.

Imusa does not reveal what coating material is used in this pan. Standard nonstick cookware without verification carries moderate PFAS risk.

The safe swap

Scanpan Ceramic Titanium

Scanpan

Scanpan Ceramic Titanium

90/100 safety

90Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nonstick coating, type unspecified

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Non-stick, chemistry undisclosed

Advertised as non-stick but coating type is not explained.

60/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cookware is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

70/ 100
♾️

Teflon-type coating fume emissions (thermal decomposition)

Imusa does not disclose whether the coating is Teflon-type coating-based. If it is, overheating above 500-600 F can release toxic fumes (polymer fume fever). The risk is manageable with proper temperature control but cannot be ruled out without ingredient transparency.

70/ 100

Coating degradation and substrate leaching

As nonstick coatings age and scratch, the underlying aluminum or steel substrate may contact food. Aluminum leaching increases in acidic foods (tomatoes, citrus); steel typically poses lower risk but depends on substrate composition.

70/ 100
🍂

Coating flaking and microparticle ingestion

If the nonstick surface degrades with use or mechanical damage, small particles of the coating can enter food. Severity depends on coating composition and amount, but is a documented concern for worn nonstick cookware of all types.

70/ 100
🍳

Unlabeled coating additives

Imusa's silence on coating chemistry means any proprietary additives (colorants, adhesion promoters, processing aids) are not disclosed to consumers. This limits your ability to assess allergic or sensitivity reactions, though serious reactions are rare.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

🧠

Lead

No recalls or test reports document lead or cadmium in Imusa cookware. However, budget-tier pans manufactured outside strict US/EU regulations carry residual risk if QA lapses. Imusa does not publish third-party lead/cadmium testing results.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Imusa 8-inch saute pan uses an unspecified nonstick coating, which is the core safety question for this product. Nonstick cookware typically relies on either Teflon-type coating (Teflon-based) polymers or ceramic/silicone alternatives, each with different thermal stability and degradation profiles. Without Imusa's disclosure of the coating chemistry, you cannot determine whether the pan risks Teflon-type coating fume emissions if overheated or whether it uses a safer alternative. The underlying substrate is typically aluminum or steel, which itself is generally safe for cookware but depends on coating integrity to prevent leaching.

The brand's record and disclosure

Imusa is a cookware brand with a long history in Latin American markets and growing US presence, but the company does not publicly disclose nonstick coating composition or PFAS/Teflon-type coating content on product pages or certifications reviewed. There are no major recalls or safety controversies on record for Imusa cookware, but the lack of transparency is a red flag in an industry where competitors (e.g., GreenPan, Our Place) now routinely market PFAS-free or ceramic-coated alternatives. The brand's silence suggests either conventional Teflon-type coating use (which would be standard for budget nonstick) or a choice not to differentiate on coating safety.

How it compares in its category

Budget and mid-range nonstick skillets like this Imusa pan are the market standard and often use conventional Teflon-type coating coatings without PFAS-free labeling. Compared to premium alternatives (e.g., GreenPan Valencia Pro, Caraway, All-Clad non-stick), this product offers no stated safety certifications or transparency. It is priced and positioned like a traditional nonstick pan, not a ceramic or Teflon-type coating-free option, which suggests standard formulation. If PFAS-free alternatives are available in your budget, they would reduce uncertainty.

If you buy it

Keep the skillet below 500 degrees F to minimize any fume risk from the unspecified coating. Hand wash and avoid abrasive scrubbers to prevent coating degradation, which can lead to flaking and leaching of underlying substrate into food. Replace the pan if the nonstick surface visibly peels, bubbles, or becomes scratched. Use on stovetop heat only (not oven broiler or direct flame) and ensure good kitchen ventilation, especially on high heat.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Imusa has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Cookware

GreenPan Ceramic Non-stick

GreenPan

Ceramic Non-stick

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade78Excellent

Coating degradation and integrity loss

Limited concern

70
🔩

Aluminum leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microparticle shedding from coating

Limited concern

70

Low risk, safe to use.

Risky category by default

Scanpan Ceramic Titanium

Scanpan

Ceramic Titanium

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
🔩

Ceramic coating degradation and aluminum leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic or particulate shedding from coating

Limited concern

70

Low risk, safe to use.

Risky category by default

GreenPan Chatham Ceramic Nonstick Frypan Set

GreenPan

Chatham Ceramic Nonstick Frypan Set

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent

Ceramic coating degradation over time

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Thermal shock and handle integrity

Limited concern

70

Low risk, safe to use.

Risky category by default

More cookware grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.