PFAS30/ 100Poor
Overall4/ 100Bad
Recode Lip Smacker Liquid Lipstick - 18 Say My Name - 3 ml

Lip Smacker · Lip Balm & Long-Wear Lipstick

Recode Lip Smacker Liquid Lipstick - 18 Say My Name - 3 ml

Poor

Waterproof cosmetic with no disclosed ingredients; PFAS presence uncertain.

Verdict · SkipWaterproof liquid lipstick with unconfirmed PFAS risk; standard cosmetic hazards apply pending full ingredient transparency from brand.

Lip Smacker's waterproof liquid lipstick formula is undisclosed. Waterproofing in cosmetics sometimes involves PFAS; brand does not address this concern.

The better-graded swap

Lip Smackers Liquid Lip Smacker Lip Party Pack

Lip Smacker

Lip Smackers Liquid Lip Smacker Lip Party Pack

75/100 safety

75Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

liquid lipstick, waterproof formula

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Recode Lip Smacker Liquid Say My Name is made of, ingredients and materials

Lip Smacker's liquid lipstick is a waterproof formulation, which typically requires film-forming polymers and water-resistant binders to adhere and persist on lips. The exact resin system is not disclosed in publicly available ingredient lists for this specific shade. Waterproof cosmetics often rely on synthetic polymers or silicone-based systems that can be difficult to remove and may accumulate on lips over repeated applications. The 3 ml size and waterproof claim suggest a pigment suspension in a volatile or polymer-heavy base, but Lip Smacker has not published a full ingredient declaration for this line accessible to consumers.

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
⚠️

1,4-dioxane (solvent contaminant)

Waterproof liquid lipsticks often use polyethylene glycol (PEG) or ethoxylated ingredients as solvents or humectants; these can be contaminated with 1,4-dioxane during manufacture. Lip Smacker does not disclose whether this product contains PEG derivatives, so presence cannot be ruled out.

70/ 100
🏷️

Fragrance allergens and undisclosed fragrance components

Lip products commonly include fragrance compounds listed only as 'fragrance' or 'parfum' on labels. This shade name 'Say My Name' suggests a scented product; potential allergens (limonene, linalool, citral) may not be individually listed and can sensitize lips with prolonged contact.

70/ 100
⚠️

Polymer film-forming agent irritation and accumulation

Waterproof liquid lipsticks depend on synthetic polymers (e.g., acrylates, silicones, or acrylic copolymers) to create a persistent film. Repeated application without thorough removal can cause buildup, dryness, and lip irritation; polymer identity is not disclosed for this product.

20/ 100

What’s reassuring

⛏️

Heavy metals

No specific reports of lead or cadmium contamination in Lip Smacker liquid lipsticks exist in public databases. Standard FDA-approved colorants (D&C Red 7, CI 15850, iron oxides) used in lip color are regulated, but third-party testing of this brand is not publicly available.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100
✅

Microplastic particles or plastic microbeads

No established reports of microbeads in Lip Smacker liquid lipsticks; however, the brand does not explicitly confirm absence. Some liquid lipsticks use film-forming polymers that shed as microplastics upon removal, but no public testing of this specific product has been reported.

95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Lip Smacker (owned by Markwins Beauty Brands) does not maintain a publicly documented commitment to PFAS avoidance or ingredient transparency beyond standard regulatory labels. The brand has not published third-party testing or certifications (such as EWG Verified, Leaping Bunny, or Clean Beauty standards) for its lip products. No major safety recalls specific to Lip Smacker liquid lipsticks have been established in public databases, but the brand's silence on waterproofing chemistry raises legitimate questions about the formulant choices in waterproof shades.

How it compares in its category

Waterproof liquid lipsticks as a category carry higher scrutiny for PFAS and film-forming polymer use than non-waterproof alternatives. Brands with explicit PFAS pledges (such as Kosas, Glossier, and Pacifica) typically avoid waterproof claims or disclose their polymer bases. Lip Smacker is a mass-market, budget-friendly brand that does not compete on transparency; this product sits at the lower end of disclosure rigor compared to premium or clean-beauty segments. If waterproofness is essential, seeking a brand with documented PFAS avoidance would reduce uncertainty.

If you buy it

Apply sparingly to avoid buildup on lips over time, especially if using daily. Remove with a dedicated makeup remover or oil (mineral oil, coconut oil) rather than soap alone, as waterproof formulas resist water. Discontinue use if redness, irritation, or swelling develops; liquid lipsticks can irritate sensitive lips due to film-forming resins or fragrance compounds. Store at room temperature and replace after 12 months to minimize microbial growth in the liquid base.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Lip Smacker has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Recode Lip Smacker Liquid Lipstick - 18 Say My Name - 3 ml?

BECCA x Chrissy Teigen Glow Gloss

Becca Cosmetics

BECCA x Chrissy Teigen Glow Gloss

75ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Glycerin, silicones, pigments, film-formers (typical liquid cosmetic gloss)
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Fragrance allergens and undisclosed components
  • Liquid lipstick, likely pigments, oils, and waxes
  • Fragrance allergens or sensitizers
  • Natural waxes and oils (beeswax, plant oils, pigments)
  • Lead

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

More lip balm & long-wear lipstick grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.