Lip Smacker · Lip Balm & Long-Wear Lipstick
Recode Lip Smacker Liquid Lipstick - 18 Say My Name - 3 ml
Waterproof cosmetic with no disclosed ingredients; PFAS presence uncertain.
Lip Smacker's waterproof liquid lipstick formula is undisclosed. Waterproofing in cosmetics sometimes involves PFAS; brand does not address this concern.
The safe swap
Lip Smacker
Lip Smacker Marvel Lip Balm
75/100 safety
Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
liquid lipstick, waterproof formula
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
What’s concerning
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
Category baseline
cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
1,4-dioxane (solvent contaminant)
Waterproof liquid lipsticks often use polyethylene glycol (PEG) or ethoxylated ingredients as solvents or humectants; these can be contaminated with 1,4-dioxane during manufacture. Lip Smacker does not disclose whether this product contains PEG derivatives, so presence cannot be ruled out.
Fragrance allergens and undisclosed fragrance components
Lip products commonly include fragrance compounds listed only as 'fragrance' or 'parfum' on labels. This shade name 'Say My Name' suggests a scented product; potential allergens (limonene, linalool, citral) may not be individually listed and can sensitize lips with prolonged contact.
Polymer film-forming agent irritation and accumulation
Waterproof liquid lipsticks depend on synthetic polymers (e.g., acrylates, silicones, or acrylic copolymers) to create a persistent film. Repeated application without thorough removal can cause buildup, dryness, and lip irritation; polymer identity is not disclosed for this product.
What’s reassuring
Heavy metals
No specific reports of lead or cadmium contamination in Lip Smacker liquid lipsticks exist in public databases. Standard FDA-approved colorants (D&C Red 7, CI 15850, iron oxides) used in lip color are regulated, but third-party testing of this brand is not publicly available.
Source: FDA ↗Microplastic particles or plastic microbeads
No established reports of microbeads in Lip Smacker liquid lipsticks; however, the brand does not explicitly confirm absence. Some liquid lipsticks use film-forming polymers that shed as microplastics upon removal, but no public testing of this specific product has been reported.
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Lip Smacker's liquid lipstick is a waterproof formulation, which typically requires film-forming polymers and water-resistant binders to adhere and persist on lips. The exact resin system is not disclosed in publicly available ingredient lists for this specific shade. Waterproof cosmetics often rely on synthetic polymers or silicone-based systems that can be difficult to remove and may accumulate on lips over repeated applications. The 3 ml size and waterproof claim suggest a pigment suspension in a volatile or polymer-heavy base, but Lip Smacker has not published a full ingredient declaration for this line accessible to consumers.
The brand's record and disclosure
Lip Smacker (owned by Markwins Beauty Brands) does not maintain a publicly documented commitment to PFAS avoidance or ingredient transparency beyond standard regulatory labels. The brand has not published third-party testing or certifications (such as EWG Verified, Leaping Bunny, or Clean Beauty standards) for its lip products. No major safety recalls specific to Lip Smacker liquid lipsticks have been established in public databases, but the brand's silence on waterproofing chemistry raises legitimate questions about the formulant choices in waterproof shades.
How it compares in its category
Waterproof liquid lipsticks as a category carry higher scrutiny for PFAS and film-forming polymer use than non-waterproof alternatives. Brands with explicit PFAS pledges (such as Kosas, Glossier, and Pacifica) typically avoid waterproof claims or disclose their polymer bases. Lip Smacker is a mass-market, budget-friendly brand that does not compete on transparency; this product sits at the lower end of disclosure rigor compared to premium or clean-beauty segments. If waterproofness is essential, seeking a brand with documented PFAS avoidance would reduce uncertainty.
If you buy it
Apply sparingly to avoid buildup on lips over time, especially if using daily. Remove with a dedicated makeup remover or oil (mineral oil, coconut oil) rather than soap alone, as waterproof formulas resist water. Discontinue use if redness, irritation, or swelling develops; liquid lipsticks can irritate sensitive lips due to film-forming resins or fragrance compounds. Store at room temperature and replace after 12 months to minimize microbial growth in the liquid base.
What we don’t know
- Basis
- Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- Lip Smacker has made none
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
Safer alternatives in Lip Balm & Long-Wear Lipstick
Burt's Bees
Lipstick Iced Iris
wax, oils, pigments (standard lip color base)
Fragrance allergens and essential oils
Limited concern
Formaldehyde / VOCs
Limited concern
Rancidity and microbial growth in wax-oil base
Limited concern
Lower concern. Conventional lipstick with no known PFAS risks identified.
⚠Risky category by default
Burt's Bees
100% Natural Moisturizing Lipstick, Fuchsia Flood, 1 Tube, Size: 0.12 oz, Pink
Natural waxes and oils (beeswax, plant oils, pigments)
Lead
Limited concern
Fragrance allergens and skin sensitization
Limited concern
Beeswax or plant oil rancidity and microbial growth
Limited concern
Lower concern. Natural lipstick with no known PFAS risks.
⚠Risky category by default
Burt's Bees
LIPSTICK
wax, oils, pigments, natural base
Fragrance allergens
Limited concern
Oil rancidity and microbial growth
Limited concern
Lower concern. Bare lipstick formula, no waterproofing or coatings flagged.
⚠Risky category by default
More lip balm & long-wear lipstick grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.