PFAS70/ 100Good
Overall62/ 100Good
Lola 100% Organic Cotton Tampons Cardboard Applicator

Lola · Period Care

Lola 100% Organic Cotton Tampons Cardboard Applicator

Good

Lower concern. Organic cotton and cardboard unlikely to contain PFAS.

Verdict · BuyOrganic cotton and cardboard applicator present lower concern for typical period-care hazards; brand transparency modest but no established safety controversies.

Lola tampons use organic cotton and cardboard applicator, materials not typically treated with PFAS. Brand does not disclose PFAS stance, but product composition presents lower concern than synthetic or coated alternatives.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

100% organic cotton, cardboard applicator

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Lola 100% Organic Cotton Applicator is made of, ingredients and materials

Lola tampons are made from 100% organic cotton, grown without synthetic pesticides or fertilizers, which reduces residue risk compared to conventional cotton. The cardboard applicator is a plant-based alternative to plastic or plastic-coated applicators, eliminating concerns tied to BPA, phthalates, or microplastic shedding during insertion. Organic cotton does not require bleaching to the same degree as conventional cotton, though some whitening is standard in the industry; the absence of chlorine-based processing chemicals is documented in organic certification.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

75/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
⚠️

Chlorine or bleaching byproducts (dioxins)

Conventional tampons are often chlorine-bleached, a known source of trace dioxins. Organic cotton may use oxygen or peroxide bleaching instead, but Lola's specific bleaching process is not disclosed in product materials. Low residual concern if oxygen-bleached, but method unconfirmed.

70/ 100
⏳

Cardboard applicator degradation or splinter risk

Cardboard is softer and more fragile than plastic. Rough handling, moisture exposure, or insertion error could cause fibers to separate or splinter. This is a use-related hazard, not a chemical one, mitigated by careful insertion and dry storage.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
🐛

Pesticide residue

This product uses 100% organic cotton, which is grown without synthetic pesticides. No residue testing data for Lola tampons has been published, but organic certification standards require exclusion of prohibited pesticides.

Source, EPA ↗
95/ 100
✅

Vaginal irritation or allergic sensitization

100% organic cotton is hypoallergenic and fragrance-free in this product, lowering sensitization risk. No published adverse event reports or recalls specific to Lola tampons. Individual sensitivity to cotton is uncommon but possible.

95/ 100
✅

Bacterial growth or contamination (applicator environment)

Cardboard applicators may absorb moisture if stored in humid conditions, potentially promoting microbial growth. Proper dry storage and single-use design reduce risk. No contamination recalls or testing data for Lola have been published.

95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Lola markets itself as a direct-to-consumer organic period brand and has publicly committed to ingredient transparency and non-toxic formulations. The brand does not prominently disclose third-party certifications such as GOTS (Global Organic Textile Standard) or ISO standards in widely available marketing materials, though organic cotton sourcing is its core claim. No recalls, safety complaints, or regulatory actions specific to Lola tampons have been recorded in public databases. PFAS disclosure by the brand is silent, consistent with many period-care producers, but the material composition (organic cotton and cardboard) carries low inherent PFAS risk.

How it compares in its category

Organic cotton tampons are a minority choice; most conventional tampons use non-organic cotton treated with pesticide residues and bleached with chlorine. Cardboard applicators reduce plastic waste and leaching concerns versus plastic applicators, though they may be slightly less smooth on insertion and have higher fragmentation risk if misused. Lola sits in the premium segment alongside brands like Cora and DAME; pricing reflects organic sourcing and direct-sales model. Chlorine-free or oxygen-bleached variants are common among organic brands; Lola's specific bleaching method is not detailed in standard product labeling.

If you buy it

Store tampons in a dry place to prevent cardboard swelling or mold growth if exposed to moisture or steam. Insert gently to avoid cardboard splintering or rough edges; cardboard applicators are biodegradable but fragile compared to plastic. Dispose in a trash bin, not a toilet, to reduce cardboard blockage risk in plumbing or sewage systems. If irritation or allergic reaction occurs, discontinue use; cotton sensitivity is rare but possible, especially if skin is compromised.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 82% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Lola has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Lola 100% Organic Cotton Tampons Cardboard Applicator?

Natracare Organic Pads

Natracare

Organic Pads

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE
  • A third party reports verifying it as PFAS-free
  • Fragrance allergens (if scented variant)

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Aunt Flow Pads

Aunt Flow

Aunt Flow Pads

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE certified✓ Organic certified
  • organic cotton with natural fibers
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Microplastics
Organyc 100% Certified Organic Cotton Tampons Cardboard Applicator

Organyc

100% Certified Organic Cotton Tampons Cardboard Applicator

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ GOTS (Global Organic Textile Standard)✓ MADE SAFE certified (for select products)
  • 100% organic cotton with cardboard applicator
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Cardboard applicator structural integrity over time

More period care grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.