Lorna Jane Amy Phone Pocket Ankle Biter Leggings Women's
Likely lower concern. No waterproof treatment apparent.
Standard nylon/spandex leggings with no disclosed water-repellent coating or stain treatments. No public PFAS claims or certifications. Material choice suggests minimal PFAS risk unless undisclosed finishing.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
nylon blend with elastane
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
You may also be interested in
Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.
Aqua Pure
3M Aqua-Pure AP802B Whole House Filter Housing
- polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial growth in spent cartridges
3 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.
Aquasure
Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System
- RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters
4 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.
Avocado
Vegan Mattress
- organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Heavy metals
2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.
What Lorna Jane Amy Phone Pocket Ankle Biter is made of, ingredients and materials
Lorna Jane Amy Ankle Biter Leggings are constructed from nylon blended with elastane (spandex), a common stretchy athletic fabric. Nylon itself is inert once cured and does not leach significantly into skin under normal wear. The elastane provides elasticity but introduces a small polymer-based component; both materials are thermoplastic and stable at body temperature, meaning no active chemical migration is expected during typical use.
What’s concerning
Category baseline
The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.
Azo dyes and colorant stability
Nylon readily accepts synthetic azo dyes in manufacturing. No third-party dye testing or restricted substance list (RSL) certification is published for this product. Risk is low under normal conditions but possible if dyes are not fully fixed during production; washing before wear mitigates this.
Elastane (spandex) degradation and microplastic shedding
All elastane-containing garments shed microfibers during washing, particularly synthetic blends. Lorna Jane does not specify elastane percentage or durability claims. Standard washing practices (cool water, gentle cycle) significantly reduce microfiber release compared to hot or aggressive laundering.
Contact allergic reactions to dyes or finishing agents
Individuals with sensitive skin or known dye allergies may react to unfixed azo dyes or residual finishes. This is a known category hazard for unbranded activewear without dermatological testing claims. Pre-washing and patch testing on sensitive skin areas reduces risk.
What’s reassuring
Base material not linked to PFAS
The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.
Formaldehyde / VOCs
Nylon does not require formaldehyde-based wrinkle resistance or mildew treatments as cotton does. No evidence of formaldehyde-release risk in this product; elastane also does not use formaldehyde finishes. This hazard is not applicable to this material class.
Source, ATSDR ↗Heavy metals
Nylon dyes are typically azo-based organics rather than heavy-metal pigments (which are more common in ceramics or cosmetics). No recalls or testing data indicate heavy metal contamination in Lorna Jane apparel. Risk is consistent with industry baseline.
Source, FDA ↗The full breakdown
The brand's record and disclosure
Lorna Jane is an Australian activewear brand with no major public safety recalls or disclosed chemical controversies on record for their core apparel lines. The brand does not publish detailed material sourcing or chemical-use transparency reports, and maintains silence on PFAS and dye practices. No independent third-party certifications (GOTS, OEKO-TEX, bluesign) are evident for this product line, which is typical for mass-market activewear but limits independent verification.
How it compares in its category
Nylon-elastane blends are the industry standard for athletic leggings and pose no worse chemical profile than competitors like Nike, Lululemon, or Athleta offerings in the same price tier. The absence of water-resistant or technical coatings is actually a safety advantage, as it eliminates the need for PFAS or other repellent finishes. Lorna Jane's lack of certification is offset by the inherent low-risk material choice.
If you buy it
Wash in cool water before first wear to reduce potential loose dye transfer or finishing residues. Machine wash warm on gentle cycle, avoid fabric softener and bleach, and line dry to preserve elastane integrity and prevent heat-induced degradation. Replace when elastane loses recovery (visible sagging, bagging at waistband) typically after 50-100 wears depending on wash frequency and intensity of use. Standard care preserves the garment and minimizes any contact with degrading polymers.
What we don’t know
- Basis
- Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- Lorna Jane has made none
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
More activewear grades
How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.