PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall8/ 100Bad
MacGregor Varsity Chest Protector

MacGregor · Sports Equipment Padding

MacGregor Varsity Chest Protector

Bad

Skip due to unknown water-repellent coating treatment, no PFAS transparency.

Verdict · SkipPadded synthetic chest protector with unknown water-resistant treatment and no brand PFAS transparency; wearable risk is low if maintained, but unknown water-repellent coating chemistry warrants cautious use and regular inspection.

Chest protector likely contains water-resistant coating, but brand discloses nothing about PFAS. water-repellent coating treatments commonly use PFAS, raising concern.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Padded synthetic fabric with water-resistant finish

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
⚠️

Water-resistant finish composition (unknown water-repellent coating chemistry)

The product uses an unspecified water-resistant treatment; if fluorochemical-based (PFAS), it may leach into sweat during intense athletic use, though dermal absorption risk is lower than ingestion. No test data or disclosure available for this specific model.

70/ 100
⚠️

Bacterial and mold growth in padding

Closed-cell foam padding retains moisture if not dried thoroughly after use; prolonged dampness can harbor bacteria and mold, which may cause skin irritation or odor. Risk is behavioral (maintenance-dependent) rather than inherent to material toxicity.

70/ 100

Polyurethane or foam degradation over time

Padding degrades with repeated compression and UV exposure; breakdown products may include microparticles, though no specific off-gassing or leachate hazard has been established for athletic padding. Replacement every 2-3 seasons of heavy use is typical.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Polyester and nylon blends used in padded athletic wear may contain formaldehyde-based resins for wrinkle resistance or shape retention; no specific formaldehyde recall or alert has been recorded for MacGregor chest protectors, but untested products in this category sometimes contain low residual levels.

Source, ATSDR
95/ 100

Azo dyes in colored fabrics

If the outer layer is dyed (common for branded colors), azo dyes may be present and could leach under heavy sweat; MacGregor has not published dye testing data, and no public safety incidents are documented for this product.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This protector uses padded synthetic fabric (likely polyester or nylon blend) with a water-resistant finish applied to the outer layer. The padding is typically closed-cell foam or polyethylene to absorb impact. Water-resistant finishes on synthetics are often fluorochemical-based (PFAS) or, less commonly, wax or polyurethane coatings; MacGregor has not disclosed which method is used here. The inner lining touching skin may be untreated polyester or cotton blend.

The brand's record and disclosure

MacGregor is a sports equipment brand with limited public sustainability or chemical disclosure statements on record. The company has not published PFAS phase-out commitments or third-party certifications (such as OEKO-TEX or Bluesign) for this product category. No known recalls or safety violations specific to this model are documented, but the absence of transparency on water-resistant treatment chemistry is a notable gap for a product worn close to skin during athletic activity.

How it compares in its category

Padded athletic protectors commonly use water-repellent coating-treated synthetic fabrics; most brands in this segment do not voluntarily disclose fluorochemical use. Premium competitors (e.g., some lacrosse/hockey brands) increasingly offer PFAS-free water repellency via wax or polyurethane, though cost and performance trade-offs exist. MacGregor's silence on this point is typical of mid-tier sports brands but lags behind category leaders adopting transparent water-repellent coating standards.

If you buy it

Rinse the protector in cool water after use to reduce sweat, bacteria, and chemical buildup on the inner surface. Wash in mild detergent and air-dry away from direct heat or UV; heat can degrade both padding and water-repellent coating. Replace if padding compresses, fabric tears, or odor persists after washing. Minimize skin contact with the untreated back or seams if you have sensitive skin, and avoid wearing over open wounds.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
MacGregor has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Sports Equipment Padding

Easton Universal Padding Fit Kit

Easton

Universal Padding Fit Kit

foam padding, elastic straps

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade43Poor
💨

Polyurethane foam off-gassing (VOCs)

Limited concern

70
⛏️

Adhesive leachables

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Elastic synthetic fiber irritation

Limited concern

70
💨

Foam fragmentation and inhalation

Moderate concern

45

Low risk product, though brand discloses nothing on PFAS.

Starting grade for this product type

Easton Pro Style Shock Absorbing Pad

Easton

Pro Style Shock Absorbing Pad

Foam padding, likely EVA or polyurethane

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade49Poor
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🎨

Azo dyes in shell fabric

Limited concern

70
💨

Adhesive volatiles (VOC/off-gassing)

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from foam breakdown

Limited concern

70

Lower concern; foam padding unlikely PFAS source, but no disclosure confirmed.

Starting grade for this product type

Macgregor Shock Absorbing Base

MacGregor

Shock Absorbing Base

foam or elastomer cushioning in shoe base

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade53Good
💨

Foam degradation and off-gassing

Limited concern

70
⛏️

Adhesive and binder leachables

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70

Unknown material composition.

Starting grade for this product type

More sports equipment padding grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.