PFAS15/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
MILTON 22 cm 1.4 Litre Induction Fry Pan

Milton · Cookware

MILTON 22 cm 1.4 Litre Induction Fry Pan

Bad

Skip until Milton discloses coating; nonstick poses PFAS risk.

Verdict: SkipNonstick coating type undisclosed; PFAS risk unquantified. Safe if used correctly and replaced before degradation; avoid high heat.

Milton doesn't reveal what nonstick coating this induction pan has, and without Teflon-type coating-free or PFAS-free certification, forever chemical exposure during cooking can't be ruled out.

The safe swap

GreenPan Ceramic Non-stick

GreenPan

GreenPan Ceramic Non-stick

90/100 safety

90Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nonstick coating, type unspecified

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Non-stick, chemistry undisclosed

Advertised as non-stick but coating type is not explained.

60/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cookware is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

70/ 100
♾️

Teflon-type coating fume inhalation risk (if Teflon-type coating-based coating)

Nonstick coating type is not disclosed. If Teflon-type coating-based, overheating above 500F (260C) can decompose the polymer and release toxic fluorinated gases (Teflon-type coating fume fever). Milton provides no temperature warning or material specification.

70/ 100
🫧

Coating degradation and microparticle release

Budget nonstick coatings degrade faster than premium formulations. Scratches, dishwasher use, and metal utensils accelerate flaking. Ingested nonstick particles have unknown long-term health effects but are not absorbed systemically.

20/ 100
⚠️

Lack of safety certification or third-party testing

Milton does not advertise compliance with CPSIA, EU chemical regulations, or independent safety certifications. This is not a violation but increases uncertainty about manufacturing controls and material sourcing.

45/ 100

What’s reassuring

🧠

Lead

No recalls or test results are on record for Milton cookware in this category. Induction cookware bases are less likely to carry heavy-metal glazes than decorative stoneware, but testing is not publicly available.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

Aluminum leaching (if composite base)

Induction compatibility may indicate a ferromagnetic composite or stainless base rather than pure aluminum, reducing leaching risk. Material composition is not disclosed by the brand.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This is a 22 cm nonstick fry pan with unspecified coating chemistry. Milton does not publicly disclose whether the nonstick layer is Teflon-type coating-based (traditional Teflon), ceramic, or hybrid. The base appears to be suitable for induction, suggesting either stainless steel or ferromagnetic composite. Without coating identification, you cannot assess whether PFAS-containing PFAS "forever chemicals" are present. The 1.4 litre capacity and shallow profile suggest moderate-temperature cooking suitability.

The brand's record and disclosure

Milton is an Indian kitchenware manufacturer with limited publicly available safety documentation in English-language sources. The brand has not issued statements on PFAS use, Teflon-type coating sourcing, or third-party safety certifications (such as GOTS, CPSIA, or independent heavy-metals testing). No major recalls specific to this model or Milton nonstick cookware are documented in public databases, but absence of disclosure is itself a transparency gap. Many regional manufacturers do not meet European or North American chemical labeling standards.

How it compares in its category

Budget induction fry pans in this price tier often use traditional Teflon-type coating or unspecified nonstick coatings without PFAS-free certification. Premium alternatives from established brands (Scanpan, GreenPan, Our Place) explicitly market PFOA-free or ceramic coatings. Milton's lack of transparency places it in the middle-risk category for nonstick cookware: neither worst-case (unbranded third-party) nor best-case (certified PFAS-free). Stainless steel or well-seasoned cast iron are safer alternatives if PFAS avoidance is a priority.

If you buy it

Never heat beyond medium-high; nonstick fumes from degraded Teflon-type coating coatings release at 500F (260C). Hand-wash only; dishwashers accelerate coating wear. Inspect regularly for scratches, peeling, or discoloration. Replace within 3-5 years or immediately if coating shows damage; damaged nonstick releases particles and potential fume precursors. Avoid acidic or abrasive foods on the nonstick side. Ensure kitchen ventilation during cooking to disperse any degradation byproducts.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Milton has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Cookware

GreenPan Ceramic Non-stick

GreenPan

Ceramic Non-stick

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade78Excellent

Coating degradation and integrity loss

Limited concern

70
🔩

Aluminum leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microparticle shedding from coating

Limited concern

70

Low risk, safe to use.

Risky category by default

Scanpan Ceramic Titanium

Scanpan

Ceramic Titanium

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
🔩

Ceramic coating degradation and aluminum leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic or particulate shedding from coating

Limited concern

70

Low risk, safe to use.

Risky category by default

GreenPan Chatham Ceramic Nonstick Frypan Set

GreenPan

Chatham Ceramic Nonstick Frypan Set

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent

Ceramic coating degradation over time

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Thermal shock and handle integrity

Limited concern

70

Low risk, safe to use.

Risky category by default

More cookware grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.