PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall12/ 100Bad
Mountainsmith Dry Kick Waterproof Fanny Pack

Mountainsmith · Waterproof Outdoor Gear Storage Bags

Mountainsmith Dry Kick Waterproof Fanny Pack

Bad

Skip unless brand confirms water-repellent coating chemistry or provides test results.

Verdict · SkipRipstop nylon pack carries unknown water-repellent coating chemistry risk; no major non-PFAS hazards reported for this material class, but brand transparency is poor.

Mountainsmith doesn't disclose waterproof treatment details or PFAS status for this pack. Typical nylon gear uses water-repellent coating coatings that may contain PFAS, but specifics are unknown.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Ripstop nylon with unspecified waterproof coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What Mountainsmith Dry Kick Waterproof Fanny is made of, ingredients and materials

The Dry Kick uses ripstop nylon as its base fabric, a durable polyamide weave common in outdoor gear. The waterproof coating chemistry is unspecified by Mountainsmith, which is the critical gap, water repellency in nylon packs is typically achieved via fluorinated or silicone-based water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finishes. Ripstop nylon itself is not inherently hazardous, but the coating applied to it determines whether PFAS or other volatile compounds are present.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
🍳

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from waterproof coating

Unspecified water-repellent coating may release low-level VOCs, particularly if exposed to heat or direct sunlight during storage or use. Ripstop nylon itself does not off-gas; the hazard is the proprietary waterproofing treatment.

70/ 100
⏳

Degradation of coating over time and re-exposure to base materials

As waterproof coating wears from use and washing, nylon fibers beneath may become exposed. While nylon itself is stable, any residual coating compounds could leach more readily once the protective layer is compromised.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Azo dyes in nylon fabric

No recalls or testing issues reported for Mountainsmith nylon packs related to azo dye content. Ripstop nylon in outdoor gear is typically low-risk for dye migration, but product-specific data is unavailable.

95/ 100
✅

Antimony in polyamide (nylon)

Antimony is occasionally used as a catalyst in polyamide synthesis but is rarely a migration concern in finished nylon fabrics at consumer-use temperatures. No specific reports for Mountainsmith or ripstop nylon packs.

95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Formaldehyde-based resins are uncommon in modern nylon waterproof coatings, but older or budget water-repellent coating formulations may include them. Mountainsmith's coating formula is unspecified, making this unverifiable.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

Mountainsmith has not publicly disclosed water-repellent coating chemistry or provided third-party testing for PFAS content in their waterproof products. The brand maintains no published sustainability or chemical transparency policy for this product line. Without explicit confirmation of non-fluorinated or fluorinated-free coatings, the waterproof treatment remains a black box from a consumer safety standpoint.

How it compares in its category

Ripstop nylon fanny packs are standard in outdoor retail; competitors like Peak Design and Patagonia have begun disclosing water-repellent coating chemistry and transitioning to PFAS-free alternatives. Mountainsmith's silence on this issue puts it below brands offering transparent sourcing. For a non-technical outdoor accessory, this pack occupies the middle market without the safety clarity that distinguishes premium or eco-conscious brands.

If you buy it

Avoid prolonged heating or washing in hot water, as heat can accelerate off-gassing of coating compounds. Hand wash with cool water and mild soap if needed; machine washing may degrade the waterproof treatment faster. Store in a well-ventilated area, especially in the first week after purchase, to allow any volatile residues from manufacturing to dissipate. If PFAS exposure is a concern for your household, contact Mountainsmith directly requesting water-repellent coating specification before purchase or consider alternatives with certified PFAS-free coatings.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Mountainsmith has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Waterproof Outdoor Gear Storage Bags

REI Co-op Trailgate Gear Bin Green 140 L

REI Co-op

Trailgate Gear Bin Green 140 L

65GoodPFAS grade
  • Polypropylene storage bin, no water-resistant coating mentioned
  • UV degradation and additive leaching

3 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

Marmot Tool Box

Marmot

Tool Box

65GoodPFAS grade
  • Nylon, polyester, cotton blend; details unspecified
  • Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from polyester and nylon manufacturing

5 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

Patagonia Disperser Roll Top Pack 40L

Patagonia

Disperser Roll Top Pack 40L

45PoorPFAS grade
  • Recycled polyester with water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • PFAS

4 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

More waterproof outdoor gear storage bags grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.