PFAS45/ 100Poor
Overall31/ 100Poor
Patagonia Men's Powder Town Jacket

Patagonia · Ski & Snowboard Jackets

Patagonia Men's Powder Town Jacket

Poor

A water-repellent or grease-resistant treatment of unstated chemistry, with a brand PFAS statement we have not verified.

Verdict · SkipRecycled polyester with unverified water-repellent coating chemistry and PFAS-free claim; Patagonia's strong sustainability record partially offsets coating uncertainty. Verify care instructions and avoid high heat.

Patagonia says 100% of its new products from Spring 2025 are made without intentionally added PFAS. We record that as an unverified brand claim. Its record describes a water-repellent or grease-resistant treatment of unstated chemistry, which is still counted.

Brand says: “Patagonia says 100% of its new products from Spring 2025 are made without intentionally added PFAS.”

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Recycled polyester shell with water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish

Brand disclosure

Brand claims PFAS-free

Lab data

No public lab test

What Patagonia Men's Powder Town Jacket is made of, ingredients and materials

The Powder Town Jacket uses recycled polyester as its shell fabric, which diverts waste but retains the base polymer properties of conventional polyester. The shell is finished with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) treatment whose specific chemistry is not disclosed on product documentation. Recycled polyester itself does not inherently release microplastics during normal wear, but abrasion and mechanical stress over time can degrade any fiber fabric. The water-repellent coating finish is the primary concern, as water-repellent coatings have historically relied on PFAS compounds, though Patagonia claims this product uses non-PFAS alternatives.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
🏷️

PFAS

Patagonia states this jacket uses PFAS-free water-repellent coating, but the specific chemical family (silicone, wax, paraffin, or proprietary blend) is not disclosed. Without third-party verification, the actual formulation and any residual PFAS cannot be confirmed. Consumer reliance on brand claims alone carries moderate uncertainty.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100
⚠️

water-repellent coating durability and reapplication need

Water-repellent coating coatings degrade with washing and UV exposure, typically losing effectiveness within 1-2 seasons. Patagonia's specific water-repellent coating durability and the safety of commercial reapplication products depend on the coating chemistry, which is not disclosed. Worn or reapplied water-repellent coating coatings may shed particles, but risk is not established as high.

45/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Brand-stated PFAS-free

The brand states this product is PFAS-free. We have not verified the claim.

100/ 100
✅

Microplastic shedding from recycled polyester

Recycled polyester fibers shed microplastics during washing and wear at rates comparable to virgin polyester. No product-specific testing is available, but the risk is inherent to synthetic fiber jackets and is not unique to Patagonia or this model. Standard washing practices (gentle cycle, cool water) minimize but do not eliminate shedding.

95/ 100
✅

Azo dyes in colored polyester

Polyester apparel may be dyed with azo compounds, some of which are restricted in the EU. Patagonia does not publicly list dye restrictions for this jacket. No recalls or adverse reports are on record for this product line, and Patagonia generally uses suppliers with stricter dye standards than industry minimum.

95/ 100
✅

Off-gassing from synthetic shell and finishes

New polyester garments may emit volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from residual manufacturing chemicals or water-repellent coating finishes. Airing the jacket outdoors for 24-48 hours before first wear reduces exposure. No hazardous off-gassing reports specific to this model are documented.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

Patagonia has a documented commitment to reducing PFAS in its apparel and has made public statements against PFAS use. However, the company does not routinely disclose the exact chemistry of water-repellent coating treatments on individual product pages, making independent verification difficult. Patagonia holds B Corp certification and publishes environmental impact reports, signaling transparency in some areas. The brand's claim of PFAS-free treatment on this jacket has not been verified by third-party testing or published lab reports available to consumers.

How it compares in its category

Most ski and snowboard jackets at this price point use either Teflon-type coating-based (Teflon) or PFAS-based water-repellent coating treatments. Patagonia's use of recycled polyester is above average for sustainability but does not reduce coating risk relative to virgin polyester. Competitors like The North Face and Arc'teryx also offer recycled-shell jackets with similar water-repellent coating disclosure gaps. Patagonia's brand reputation for environmental responsibility places it toward the lower concern end of the category, though absolute certainty on coating chemistry remains unavailable.

If you buy it

Wash the jacket in cool water with minimal agitation and air dry; hot water and machine drying can degrade both the shell and the water-repellent coating finish. Do not dry clean or expose the jacket to high heat (saunas, radiators), as this may compromise the water-repellent coating. Reapply a commercial non-PFAS water-repellent coating product every 1-2 seasons if beading diminishes, but follow product instructions to avoid overtreatment. Store in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight to slow material degradation and maintain the water-repellent coating performance.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Patagonia has made a specific claim

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Ski & Snowboard Jackets

Allbirds Jackets & Coats Allbirds Full Zip Wool Blend Puffer Jacket Women Size Small

Allbirds

Jackets & Coats Allbirds Full Zip Wool Blend Puffer Jacket Women Size Small

65GoodPFAS grade
  • Wool blend with synthetic fill (likely polyester)
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating composition

3 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

Allbirds Jackets & Coats Allbirds Men's Trino Puffer Jacket Full Zip Wool Blend Forest Green Coat Size Sm

Allbirds

Jackets & Coats Allbirds Men's Trino Puffer Jacket Full Zip Wool Blend Forest Green Coat Size Sm

65GoodPFAS grade
  • wool blend (natural fiber dominant)
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) treatment - undisclosed chemistry

2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

Allbirds NWT Womens Medium Green Natural Run Mid Layer 1/4 Zip Jacket

Allbirds

NWT Womens Medium Green Natural Run Mid Layer 1/4 Zip Jacket

65GoodPFAS grade
  • Merino wool blend (natural fiber)
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Azo dyes and synthetic dye residue

3 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

More ski & snowboard jackets grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.