PFAS40/ 100Poor
Overall28/ 100Poor
Pelican Marine Waterproof Floating Phone Pouch

Pelican · Waterproof Phone Cases

Pelican Marine Waterproof Floating Phone Pouch

Poor

Waterproof coating not disclosed; higher PFAS risk likely.

Verdict: SkipUndisclosed waterproof coating carries elevated PFAS risk; other PVC/TPU hazards low if unused near heat. Usable with precautions.

Pelican does not disclose waterproof treatment materials or PFAS status. Waterproof pouches typically use water-repellent coating coatings that may contain PFAS.

The safe swap

Apple iPhone 17 Pro TechWoven Case with MagSafe

Apple

Apple iPhone 17 Pro TechWoven Case with MagSafe

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

PVC or TPU waterproof lining, coating unspecified

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🧴

Phthalates

If PVC is the primary material, phthalates added for flexibility could leach into prolonged contact with skin or sweat in warm conditions. No specific test data available for this model; risk is material-class baseline.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
💨

TPU degradation and off-gassing

If TPU is the lining material, exposure to heat, UV, or salt water over months can cause breakdown and release of volatile organic compounds or unreacted monomers. This is typical degradation, not manufacturing defect, but accelerated if stored in hot vehicles.

70/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding from coating wear

As the waterproof coating chips or peels with age and friction, small particles may enter water or skin contact. No data on coating formulation or durability limits for this product.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

⛏️

Heavy metals

Pelican does not disclose pigment composition. High-visibility colored waterproof pouches sometimes contain cadmium or lead compounds in surface dyes, though modern suppliers typically avoid them; no recalls flagged for this product.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

Allergen or irritant fragrance additives

No evidence this product contains intentional fragrance, though some waterproof coatings release isocyanate odors during curing. If new, airing out before skin contact is prudent.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This pouch uses PVC or TPU (thermoplastic polyurethane) as the waterproof liner, neither inherently toxic at rest. The critical unknown is the waterproof coating or water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish applied to achieve flotation and sealing performance. Pelican does not disclose the chemical nature of this coating, which is where PFAS compounds are typically introduced in marine equipment to create water-shedding properties.

The brand's record and disclosure

Pelican is a manufacturer known for protective equipment and cases but has not published transparency statements on PFAS use in waterproof coatings or commitments to phase them out. No major recalls or safety controversies are on record for this specific product model. The brand's silence on coating chemistry is notable given industry-wide scrutiny of water-repellent coating finishes in water-contact gear.

How it compares in its category

Waterproof phone pouches as a category frequently rely on PFAS-containing water-repellent coating coatings because they are effective and durable. Some competitors (notably Dry Bags by other makers) have begun listing PFOA-free or non-fluorinated options, making Pelican's lack of disclosure stand out as less progressive. This product sits in the mid-market segment where cost prioritizes performance over chemical transparency.

If you buy it

Avoid prolonged skin contact with the pouch itself, particularly on sensitive skin or in warm conditions when off-gassing may increase. Do not expose to direct heat or place in a hot car, as PVC and TPU can degrade and leach plasticizers if heated. Rinse the exterior after salt water use to prevent coating degradation that may expose underlying materials. Replace if the waterproof layer cracks, peels, or degrades, as this signals protective failure and potential chemical exposure during continued use.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Pelican has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Waterproof Phone Cases

Blackview C03 Leather Protective Case with Shoulder Strap For Active 7/Active 10 Pro

Blackview

C03 Leather Protective Case with Shoulder Strap For Active 7/Active 10 Pro

leather (primary material), shoulder strap

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
🧠

Lead

Limited concern

70
🎨

Synthetic dyes and colorants in leather and strap fabric

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from tanning and finishing

Moderate concern

45
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70

Lower concern. Leather cases rarely treated with PFAS.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Griffin Survivor Case with Belt Clip for Apple iPhone 4/4S GB01902

Griffin

Survivor Case with Belt Clip for Apple iPhone 4/4S GB01902

Polycarbonate, silicone, TPE

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade81Excellent
💨

Volatile organic compound (VOC) off-gassing

Limited concern

70

Lower concern phone case.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Griffin Survivor Strong for iPhone 11 Pro GIP-023

Griffin

Survivor Strong for iPhone 11 Pro GIP-023

TPU, polycarbonate, recycled plastic

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade77Excellent
🎨

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70
💨

VOC off-gassing (polycarbonate/TPU)

Limited concern

70

Phone case materials lower concern.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More waterproof phone cases grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.