(3 pack) Ping Sport Tech Golf Glove Mens
High-risk golf glove with unclear PFAS treatment status.
These gloves feature a leather palm with synthetic backing and water-resistant coating. Ping hasn't disclosed any PFAS information.
The better-graded swap
Wilson
Wilson Staff Model Golf Balls
85/100 safety
Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
leather palm with synthetic back, water-resistant treatment
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
You may also be interested in
Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.
Aqua Pure
3M Aqua-Pure AP802B Whole House Filter Housing
- polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial growth in spent cartridges
3 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.
Aquasure
Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System
- RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters
4 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.
Avocado
Vegan Mattress
- organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Heavy metals
2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.
What (3 pack) Ping Sport Tech Golf Glove Mens is made of, ingredients and materials
Ping Sport Tech gloves combine genuine leather on the palm (for grip and durability) with synthetic material on the back (typically polyester or nylon for flexibility and breathability). The water-resistant treatment applied to the synthetic back is the primary chemical concern; Ping does not publicly disclose whether this coating uses PFAS-based water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) chemistry or fluorine-free alternatives. Leather itself is generally low-risk from a toxicology standpoint if tannage is conventional, but tannery practices vary widely and are not disclosed here.
What’s concerning
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.
Category baseline
The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
Water-resistant (water-repellent coating) coating chemistry
Ping does not disclose whether the water-repellent coating treatment uses PFAS-based repellents or fluorine-free alternatives. PFAS water-repellent coating is graded separately (20/100); this entry flags the coating itself as a source of uncertainty regarding long-term skin contact and wash-out migration. Hand contact during extended wear (several hours per round) is routine.
Coating degradation and microparticle release
Over time, flexing and washing cause water-resistant coatings to crack and shed microscopic particles. With repeated hand contact, small amounts of coating debris may be ingested or inhaled. The chemical composition of shed particles is unknown given Ping's non-disclosure of coating formulation.
What’s reassuring
Formaldehyde / VOCs
No recalls or public warnings exist for formaldehyde in Ping gloves. Polyester and nylon back materials and their finishing treatments may contain low residual formaldehyde, but levels in athletic gloves are typically well below skin-contact thresholds. Not a primary concern without evidence of specific batch issues.
Source, ATSDR ↗Azo dyes in synthetic back material
Restricted azo dyes (those cleaving to carcinogenic amines) are banned in EU apparel and increasingly regulated globally. Ping, as a mainstream brand, is likely using compliant dyes, but the company does not certify this publicly. Risk is low if product is made to standard apparel regulations.
Lead
Chrome tanning is the dominant industrial method and presents lower concern when residual chromium is properly fixed. Lead contamination in leather is rare in modern tanneries but not ruled out without test data. Ping does not disclose tannery or tannage method; assumes standard compliance but no assurance available.
Source, ATSDR ↗The full breakdown
The brand's record and disclosure
Ping does not publish a publicly available list of chemical restrictions, PFAS policies, or third-party certifications (such as Bluesign, OEKO-TEX, or GOTS) for apparel products. The company has not voluntarily disclosed water-repellent coating chemistry for its gloves. This silence is not unusual for golf equipment makers but stands in contrast to outdoor apparel brands that have begun phasing PFAS-based treatments. No major safety recalls or formaldehyde controversies are on record for Ping apparel.
How it compares in its category
Golf gloves occupy a niche category where water resistance is a core performance claim, making water-repellent coating treatment nearly universal. Most competitors (Callaway, TaylorMade, FootJoy) similarly do not disclose water-repellent coating chemistry. Brands offering explicit fluorine-free or PFAS-free options in golf gloves remain rare; this product is typical rather than exceptional in its lack of transparency. Price and performance positioning suggest standard mid-market manufacturing without premium sustainability commitments.
If you buy it
Wash gloves by hand in cool water with mild soap; avoid hot water or machine washing, which can degrade coating integrity and trigger leaching. Do not dry in direct heat or sunlight. Replace gloves when grip deteriorates or seams begin to fray, typically every 1-3 seasons depending on use frequency. Store in a dry place; moisture trapped inside can promote mold. Inspect the synthetic back regularly for coating cracks or peeling, which indicate the barrier is compromised.
What we don’t know
- Basis
- Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- Ping has made none
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
Better-graded alternatives in Golf Balls & Equipment
Wilson
Men's Profile Complete Golf Set
- Steel clubheads, graphite shafts, rubber grips
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Graphite shaft resin degradation and fiber exposure
3 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.
Callaway
Golf Gloves 3-Pack Premium Cabretta Leather
- Cabretta leather, likely tannin-tanned
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Heavy metals
4 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.
Acushnet
Ladies Small Acushnet Golf Glove White Lh
- leather or synthetic leather with cotton lining
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Heavy metals
4 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.
Find an alternative on AmazonMore golf balls & equipment grades
How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.