PFAS40/ 100Poor
Overall14/ 100Bad
FootJoy Men's Pure Touch Limited 3-Pack Golf Gloves White

FootJoy · Golf Balls & Equipment

FootJoy Men's Pure Touch Limited 3-Pack Golf Gloves White

Poor

Golf glove with leather and water-repellent treatment, PFAS undisclosed.

Verdict · SkipCabretta leather gloves with undisclosed water-repellent treatment; typical tannery and water-repellent coating chemistry carry low-to-moderate hazards, but PFAS status opacity and lack of brand transparency warrant cautious use.

Cabretta leather golf glove with water-resistant finish. FootJoy makes no PFAS disclosures; water-repellent coating coatings often contain PFAS though leather gloves present lower exposure risk.

The better-graded swap

Mizuno Comp Glove

Mizuno

Mizuno Comp Glove

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Cabretta leather with water-repellent coating finish

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

FootJoy does not disclose water-repellent coating chemistry. Cabretta leather gloves typically receive fluorochemical treatments; PFAS presence is plausible but unconfirmed. Skin exposure during normal use is low-risk, but manufacturing and disposal pathways may carry environmental concern.

Source, ATSDR
70/ 100
🧠

Lead

Cabretta is tanned using standard industrial processes. Chrome tanning is common and regulated in developed nations, but FootJoy does not publish tannery location or metal testing results. Residual chromium on the glove surface is unlikely to leach via brief skin contact, but cannot be ruled out without third-party testing.

Source, ATSDR
70/ 100

Degradation of water-repellent coating over time and laundering

Water-repellent finishes degrade with friction, sweat, and washing. As the water-repellent coating wears, the underlying leather absorbs moisture, reducing grip and accelerating material breakdown. This is a performance issue tied to product lifespan, not a direct toxicity hazard, but it may lead to premature replacement waste.

20/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No specific formaldehyde release incidents reported for FootJoy golf gloves. Cabretta leather finishing may include formaldehyde-based compounds, but off-gassing risk is minimal given the product's use case (worn on hands, not inhaled or heated).

Source, ATSDR
95/ 100

Azo dyes in leather coloring

White Cabretta leather typically uses low levels of synthetic dyes; restricted azo dyes are largely phased out in European and North American tanneries. No reported incidents for FootJoy white gloves, but formal dye testing is not disclosed.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

FootJoy Pure Touch gloves use Cabretta leather, a soft sheepskin prized for golf grip and feel. The water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish is the chemical wildcard, it repels water and sweat but its composition is not disclosed. water-repellent coating coatings historically relied on PFAS compounds, though some manufacturers have migrated to PFAS-free alternatives; FootJoy has not stated which approach they use here.

The brand's record and disclosure

FootJoy (Acushnet Company) does not maintain public transparency on water-repellent coating chemistry, PFAS use, or tannery practices. The brand has no prominent sustainability or chemical disclosure statements accessible for consumer review. No major recalls or formaldehyde/azo dye incidents are on record for this product line, but the silence on water-repellent treatment composition is a significant gap in available safety information.

How it compares in its category

Golf gloves occupy a narrow niche; most competitors (Titleist, Callaway, PGA Tour) also use Cabretta leather with undisclosed water-repellent coating finishes. Few brands in this category have published PFAS or chemical certifications. If you prioritize transparency, look for gloves with explicit PFAS-free or OEKO-TEX certifications, though these are rare in premium golf wear.

If you buy it

Wear them as intended during golf; skin contact is brief and glove design limits leaching. Wash by hand in cool water with mild soap after use to remove sweat and reduce residual chemical buildup. Do not machine wash or dry-clean. Replace every 1-2 seasons (12-24 months of regular play) or sooner if water-repellent coating visibly degrades or water no longer beads on the palm. Store in a dry place to prevent mold growth in humid climates.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 62% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
FootJoy has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Golf Balls & Equipment

Vice Drip Golf Balls

Vice Golf

Vice Drip Golf Balls

synthetic polymer core with urethane/elastomer cover

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade85Excellent
Excellent

PFAS unlikely. Brand silent on composition details.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Bridgestone

Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Leather, synthetic leather, or textile blend

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
⚠️

Chromium in leather tanning residue

Limited concern

70
🎨

Azo dyes in colored leather or synthetic components

Limited concern

70
⛏️

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern, but brand provides no transparency.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Lady Golf Glove

Bridgestone

Lady Golf Glove

Synthetic leather or leather with standard stitching

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic leather

Limited concern

70

Golf glove with typical materials, lower concern profile.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More golf balls & equipment grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.