PFAS40/ 100Poor
Overall32/ 100Poor
Dunlop Women’s Left Hand Golf Glove, Large. All-weather Dupont

Dunlop · Golf Balls & Equipment

Dunlop Women’s Left Hand Golf Glove, Large. All-weather Dupont

Poor

Leather glove with DuPont all-weather coating; PFAS risk unclear.

Verdict · SkipLeather golf glove with undisclosed DuPont treatment; PFAS risk unclear, but no formaldehyde or azo-dye concerns typical of this category.

Golf glove with leather and all-weather treatment from DuPont. No PFAS-free claim or third-party verification available from Dunlop.

The better-graded swap

BRUCE BOLT Original Series Golf Glove

Bruce Bolt

BRUCE BOLT Original Series Golf Glove

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Leather with all-weather DuPont treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

DuPont's name on the label raises concern because DuPont historically manufactured Teflon-family coating (e.g., Teflon), but this glove's specific treatment is not disclosed. Without product documentation, PFAS presence cannot be ruled out. Contact with skin is low-risk; concern is mainly migration into sweat during use.

Source, ATSDR
70/ 100
🫧

Coating degradation and microparticle shedding

Repeated flexing, washing, and UV exposure can cause the all-weather coating to crack and shed microscopic particles. These are unlikely to be inhaled during golf use but could accumulate in wash water. Visible flaking signals replacement is needed.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Dunlop does not specify tanning method (chrome vs. vegetable), and no recalls or regulatory action are recorded for their golf gloves. If chrome-tanned, residual chromium III (low toxicity) may be present but poses negligible risk from hand contact; formaldehyde use in leather finishing is rare and not flagged in this product line.

Source, ATSDR
95/ 100

Synthetic lining irritation or off-gassing

The inner lining material is not specified in available product information. If polyester or nylon-based, risk of volatile organic compounds or formaldehyde releasers is low under normal wear (no heat exposure, well-ventilated use). No adverse reactions reported for this glove model.

95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Leather golf gloves typically use iron oxide or chromium-based tannins for color, both of which pose minimal skin-contact hazard. No lead or cadmium contamination has been reported in Dunlop glove products. Risk is negligible during normal use.

Source, FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This glove is genuine leather with a DuPont all-weather synthetic coating or finish applied to improve water resistance and durability. Leather itself is a processed animal hide, treated during tanning (historically with chromium salts, now often vegetable-tanned). The DuPont treatment is the chemical unknown here, it could be a Teflon-family coating resin (which would introduce PFAS risk) or a non-fluorinated polyurethane or acrylic polymer, but Dunlop does not disclose which. Leather inherently resists most hazards (formaldehyde resins, azo dyes, heavy metal pigments) because it is not a synthetic textile.

The brand's record and disclosure

Dunlop (part of Sumitomo Rubber since 1984) does not publicly disclose PFAS content in apparel or whether their all-weather treatments use fluorinated compounds. No major recalls or safety controversies are on record for this specific glove model. The brand's silence on PFAS treatment chemistry is consistent with the broader golf-apparel industry, where waterproofing coatings are rarely detailed to consumers. Dunlop is a legacy sports equipment maker with stable manufacturing but minimal third-party certifications for chemical safety.

How it compares in its category

Golf gloves are a low-hazard category compared to, for example, athletic shoes or jackets with flame-retardant finishes. Leather golf gloves may have lower concern than synthetic-mesh gloves, which may contain formaldehyde-based binders or azo dyes. The main variable here is the waterproofing treatment, many premium golf gloves (especially all-weather models from brands like TaylorMade, FootJoy, Callaway) use similar proprietary coatings with undisclosed PFAS status. Dunlop's offering is mid-market and unremarkable in transparency relative to competitors.

If you buy it

Wash the glove by hand in cool water with mild soap to preserve the leather and coating; avoid machine washing and high heat. Do not soak it for extended periods, as water can penetrate the stitching and degrade the inner lining. Replace the glove when the grip surface becomes slick, the leather cracks, or the seams separate, typically after 6-12 months of regular play. Store it dry in a ventilated space and avoid prolonged direct sunlight, which can cause leather fading and coating brittleness.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 62% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Dunlop has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Golf Balls & Equipment

Vice Drip Golf Balls

Vice Golf

Vice Drip Golf Balls

synthetic polymer core with urethane/elastomer cover

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade85Excellent
Excellent

PFAS unlikely. Brand silent on composition details.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Bridgestone

Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Leather, synthetic leather, or textile blend

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
⚠️

Chromium in leather tanning residue

Limited concern

70
🎨

Azo dyes in colored leather or synthetic components

Limited concern

70
⛏️

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern, but brand provides no transparency.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Lady Golf Glove

Bridgestone

Lady Golf Glove

Synthetic leather or leather with standard stitching

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic leather

Limited concern

70

Golf glove with typical materials, lower concern profile.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More golf balls & equipment grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.