PFAS40/ 100Poor
Overall10/ 100Bad
Bridgestone Golf Men's Tour Premium Golf Glove

Bridgestone · Golf Balls & Equipment

Bridgestone Golf Men's Tour Premium Golf Glove

Poor

Golf glove with water resistance; water-repellent coating risk unclear.

Verdict · SkipLeather palm glove with unclear water-resistant coating; PFAS risk present but glove is worn externally. Monitor for coating degradation and skin contact irritation.

Bridgestone doesn't disclose PFAS use or avoidance in this glove. Leather and synthetic materials normally have lower PFAS concern, but water-resistant treatments often contain PFAS without brand transparency.

The better-graded swap

Pinnacle Golf Balls

Pinnacle

Pinnacle Golf Balls

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Leather palm with synthetic/textile backing, water-resistant treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Fluorocarbon-based water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating

Water-resistant golf gloves almost universally use PFAS-based water-repellent coating finishes to meet performance standards. Bridgestone's PFAS score of 20/100 and lack of disclosure suggest reliance on legacy fluorocarbon chemistry. Skin contact during wear is low but prolonged or repeated handling during storage/cleaning may increase dermal exposure.

20/ 100
⚠️

Chromium salts from leather tanning

Leather palms are tanned using chromium (III) salts, a regulated but standard process. Leaching risk during normal wear is minimal due to leather's low solubility; however, acidic sweat or prolonged moisture exposure could increase mobilization. No recalls or complaints specific to this glove have been reported.

70/ 100
🫧

Synthetic textile backing degradation and microfiber shedding

Polyester or nylon backing can shed microfibers when washed or abraded, especially as the glove ages and coating wears. The extent of shedding is not quantified for golf gloves, but repeated laundering and friction during use accelerate fiber release. This is a general textile concern, not unique to Bridgestone.

70/ 100
⚠️

Mold and bacterial colonization if stored damp

Golf gloves are commonly stored in gear bags without drying, creating warm, moist conditions ideal for microbial growth. This is a hygiene and odor issue rather than a chemical hazard, but can cause skin irritation if the glove is worn without proper drying and airing.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Azo dyes in synthetic fabric

Bridgestone does not disclose dye chemistry for the textile backing. Most golf gloves use synthetic dyes that are not certified as azo-free. Risk of skin sensitization is low during normal wear but possible with prolonged moisture and friction (e.g., sweaty hands, extended play in humid conditions).

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Bridgestone's Tour Premium pairs genuine leather on the palm (for grip and durability) with synthetic textile backing (polyester or nylon blend for moisture management and structure). The water-resistant treatment is a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish applied to the fabric and leather surfaces, likely fluorocarbon-based given the PFAS score, though Bridgestone does not publicly disclose the chemistry. Leather itself is tanned with chromium salts in most commercial golf gloves; this is a standard, regulated process with low migration risk during wear, but disposal should avoid composting.

The brand's record and disclosure

Bridgestone does not publish detailed chemical composition or third-party certifications for golf gloves; their website lacks material safety transparency or PFAS commitments specific to apparel. The brand has no public recalls for this glove line. Bridgestone is a large manufacturer with some sustainability initiatives, but golf equipment remains a lower-scrutiny category in their portfolio, and they have not adopted PFAS phase-out pledges comparable to major outdoor apparel brands.

How it compares in its category

Golf gloves are less regulated than food contact or cosmetic items, so hazard disclosure is sparse across all brands. Premium leather gloves from Bridgestone, Titleist, and Callaway all rely on synthetic backing and water-resistant coatings; none voluntarily disclose water-repellent coating chemistry. Budget synthetic-only gloves (polyurethane palm, polyester back) eliminate leather tanning salts but introduce other polymer leachables. This mid-to-premium positioning means typical durability (18-36 holes before replacement) but also a higher likelihood of fluorocarbon water-repellent coating versus cheaper wax-based alternatives.

If you buy it

Wear gloves on your dominant hand; contact with skin is indirect and brief during each swing, minimizing exposure to coating or tanning residues. Hand wash in cool water after use to extend the water-repellent finish; avoid heat (dryers, direct sun) which can degrade synthetic backing and accelerate coating wear. Replace when the leather cracks, seams separate, or the back loses elasticity (typically every 1-3 seasons for regular players). Store in a dry bag; damp storage encourages mold and microbial growth on the synthetic interior, a common complaint in golf glove reviews.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 62% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Bridgestone has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Golf Balls & Equipment

Vice Drip Golf Balls

Vice Golf

Vice Drip Golf Balls

synthetic polymer core with urethane/elastomer cover

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade85Excellent
Excellent

PFAS unlikely. Brand silent on composition details.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Bridgestone

Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Leather, synthetic leather, or textile blend

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
⚠️

Chromium in leather tanning residue

Limited concern

70
🎨

Azo dyes in colored leather or synthetic components

Limited concern

70
⛏️

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern, but brand provides no transparency.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Lady Golf Glove

Bridgestone

Lady Golf Glove

Synthetic leather or leather with standard stitching

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic leather

Limited concern

70

Golf glove with typical materials, lower concern profile.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More golf balls & equipment grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.