PING New Golf Black Cart Mittens Gloves OSFA Unisex NWT - New Sports & outdoors
Likely lower concern; waterproof golf mittens may use water-repellent coating treatment.
Ping golf mittens feature knit fabric with likely waterproof-resistant durable coating, which may contain PFAS. Ping makes no public PFAS disclosure.
The better-graded swap
Nitro Golf
Nitro Glycerin Golf Balls 15-Pack
85/100 safety
Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
knit fabric, likely waterproof-treated
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
You may also be interested in
Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.
Aqua Pure
3M Aqua-Pure AP802B Whole House Filter Housing
- polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial growth in spent cartridges
3 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.
Aquasure
Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System
- RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters
4 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.
Avocado
Vegan Mattress
- organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Heavy metals
2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.
What PING New Golf Black Cart Mittens Gloves is made of, ingredients and materials
PING golf mittens are knit fabric (likely synthetic blend, polyester, nylon, or acrylic) with a waterproof or water-resistant finish applied to the outer surface. The water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating is the primary chemical concern; modern golf apparel typically uses either PFAS-based Teflon-family coating or newer silicone/paraffin alternatives. Knit construction means no dyes are baked into the fibers at extreme heat, reducing formaldehyde-releaser residue compared to woven or treated fabrics. Direct skin contact is minimal since these are gloves, limiting dermal absorption risk.
What’s concerning
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.
Category baseline
The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating - fluorochemical or alternative
PING does not disclose water-repellent coating chemistry. If PFAS-based (legacy Teflon-family coating), residual fluorine may leach slightly into sweat during wet play; modern alternatives (silicone, paraffin wax) carry no known hazard. Exposure is topical and intermittent, not ingested, reducing risk.
Synthetic microfiber shedding
If mittens contain microfiber fleece or brushed synthetic lining, repeated washing and wear may release microplastics into water and wastewater. No testing on PING gloves exists. Effect is environmental rather than personal health; use a microfiber catch bag during laundering if concerned.
What’s reassuring
Azo dyes and colorfast finishes
Black knit mittens typically use pre-dyed synthetic fibers (polyester, nylon) rather than post-knit dyeing, which reduces azo-dye carcinogen risk. No recalls or testing data link PING gloves to dye toxicity. Color bleed into sweat is minimal for quality knit fabrics.
Formaldehyde / VOCs
Knit gloves do not typically receive formaldehyde-based finishing (common in woven dress shirts). No published data suggests PING applies antimicrobial resins to this product. Risk is negligible unless gloves are treated post-purchase with laundry additives.
Source, ATSDR ↗Heavy metals
Modern polyester and nylon dyes rarely contain lead, cadmium, or chromium in commercial sportswear; PING is a reputable manufacturer unlikely to source contaminated fiber. No advisories exist for this brand. Risk is theoretical unless product originates from unregulated supply chains, which is unlikely for Karsten Manufacturing.
Source, FDA ↗The full breakdown
The brand's record and disclosure
PING (Karsten Manufacturing, Arizona-based) is a legacy golf equipment maker with no documented safety recalls or chemical transparency disclosures specific to apparel lines. The brand does not publish material safety data sheets or PFAS commitments for gloves. No third-party certifications (BLUESIGN, Cradle to Cradle, GOTS) are known for this product line, which is typical for performance sportswear from traditional manufacturers. Industry silence on PFAS use is standard unless a brand has committed to phaseout.
How it compares in its category
Golf gloves and mittens occupy a low-hazard niche; they see brief, seasonal use and minimal repeated hand-to-mouth contact compared to everyday apparel. Water-repellent treatment is essential for function, so some chemical finish is unavoidable. PING's approach is unremarkable for the category, mid-tier brands typically apply standard industrial water-repellent coating without disclosure. Comparison, luxury brands (e.g., Callaway, TaylorMade premium lines) also use non-disclosed water-repellent coating; budget alternatives (range gloves) may use simpler treatments or none.
If you buy it
Wash in lukewarm water with mild detergent before first use to reduce residual finishes; avoid hot water and dryers, which can degrade the waterproof coating. Store in a dry place; do not leave damp in a bag, as moisture can degrade knit elasticity and promote mildew. Replace when the gripping surface wears (typically 1-2 seasons of weekly use) or when waterproofing noticeably fails. These are not heated or mouthed, so off-gassing and ingestion risks are negligible; the main exposure route is dermal contact with the coating during wet use.
What we don’t know
- Basis
- Model estimate, 55% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- Ping has made none
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
Better-graded alternatives in Golf Balls & Equipment
Wilson
Men's Profile Complete Golf Set
- Steel clubheads, graphite shafts, rubber grips
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Graphite shaft resin degradation and fiber exposure
3 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.
Callaway
Golf Gloves 3-Pack Premium Cabretta Leather
- Cabretta leather, likely tannin-tanned
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Heavy metals
4 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.
Acushnet
Ladies Small Acushnet Golf Glove White Lh
- leather or synthetic leather with cotton lining
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Heavy metals
4 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.
Find an alternative on AmazonMore golf balls & equipment grades
How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.