PFAS15/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Prestige Aluminium Omega Select Plus IB Non-Stick Fry Pan

Prestige · Cookware

Prestige Aluminium Omega Select Plus IB Non-Stick Fry Pan

Bad

Unknown nonstick coating creates PFAS concern without disclosure.

Verdict: SkipAluminium body with unspecified non-stick coating and silent PFAS stance requires cautious use; acceptable if heat limits respected and coating monitored.

Prestige won't disclose the nonstick coating composition or PFAS status on this aluminum pan. Standard aluminum nonstick cookware typically uses Teflon-type coating or similar Teflon-family coating, and you cannot rule out the risk without brand transparency.

The safe swap

Le Creuset Enameled Cast Iron

Le Creuset

Le Creuset Enameled Cast Iron

80/100 safety

80Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Aluminium body, unspecified non-stick coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Non-stick, chemistry undisclosed

Advertised as non-stick but coating type is not explained.

60/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cookware is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

70/ 100
🔩

Aluminium leaching

Uncoated or damaged aluminium surfaces can transfer aluminium ions into acidic foods (tomato sauce, citrus, vinegar) and salt-based dishes. Risk is elevated if the non-stick coating wears through or if the pan is used above moderate heat.

70/ 100
♾️

Teflon-type coating fume risk (if coating is Teflon-type coating-based)

If the unspecified coating contains Teflon-type coating (Teflon), overheating above 300°C can release fumes that cause polymer fume fever in humans and are acutely toxic to pet birds. Brand silence on chemistry means users cannot rule this out and must assume conservative heat limits.

70/ 100
🍂

Coating degradation and flaking

Consumer reports and user forums document that non-stick coatings on mid-range aluminium pans (including some Prestige models) degrade within 1 to 3 years of normal use, leading to chipping and potential ingestion of coating fragments.

45/ 100
🍳

Thermal stability of unspecified coating

Without disclosed coating identity, chemical stability at typical cooking temperatures cannot be assessed. Unknown polymers may off-gas volatile organic compounds (VOCs) or degrade into unconventional byproducts, particularly if the pan is repeatedly heated and cooled.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

🧠

Lead

No specific recalls or test results implicating lead or cadmium in Prestige non-stick coatings are on public record. However, lack of disclosure and third-party testing means this hazard has not been ruled out for certainty.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This pan has an aluminium body topped with an unspecified non-stick coating. Aluminium cookware can leach metal into acidic or salt-heavy foods, especially when the protective coating degrades. The non-stick coating identity is critical to safety assessment, and Prestige has not publicly disclosed whether it is Teflon-type coating-based (traditional Teflon), ceramic, or another chemistry. This opacity creates uncertainty around both fume risk at high heat and long-term coating stability.

The brand's record and disclosure

Prestige is a major Indian and global cookware manufacturer with a long market presence, but maintains minimal public disclosure on coating chemistry or PFAS content in their non-stick lines. No major recalls or safety controversies specific to this model are on record. The brand does not publish third-party certifications for PFAS-free or heavy-metal-tested cookware, and has not responded to industry requests for transparency on non-stick formulations. This silence is typical of mass-market cookware brands but leaves consumers without assurance.

How it compares in its category

Prestige non-stick cookware sits in the mid-range consumer segment. It is broadly comparable to other unlabeled aluminium non-stick pans from brands like Calphalon or T-fal, which also do not always disclose coating chemistry upfront. Premium brands (Le Creuset, Staub, All-Clad) typically offer ceramic or enameled cast iron alternatives with full material disclosure. Budget brands and Prestige's price point offer convenience but trade away transparency that higher-end options provide.

If you buy it

Keep heat below medium-high; never exceed 350°C, as unknown non-stick coatings may off-gas or degrade rapidly above this threshold. Inspect the coating monthly for chips, scratches, or peeling; discard the pan if damage appears, as bare aluminium will leach into food. Hand wash only and avoid metal utensils, scouring pads, and abrasive cleaners to extend coating life. Replace the pan every 3 to 5 years or sooner if the non-stick performance fails noticeably.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Prestige has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Cookware

GreenPan Ceramic Non-stick

GreenPan

Ceramic Non-stick

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade78Excellent

Coating degradation and integrity loss

Limited concern

70
🔩

Aluminum leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microparticle shedding from coating

Limited concern

70

Low risk, safe to use.

Risky category by default

Scanpan Ceramic Titanium

Scanpan

Ceramic Titanium

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
🔩

Ceramic coating degradation and aluminum leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic or particulate shedding from coating

Limited concern

70

Low risk, safe to use.

Risky category by default

GreenPan Chatham Ceramic Nonstick Frypan Set

GreenPan

Chatham Ceramic Nonstick Frypan Set

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent

Ceramic coating degradation over time

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Thermal shock and handle integrity

Limited concern

70

Low risk, safe to use.

Risky category by default

More cookware grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.