PFAS65/ 100Good
Overall59/ 100Good
Pyrex 10-Inch Fry Pan Ceramic Cookware With Stainless Steel Handles

Pyrex · Cookware

Pyrex 10-Inch Fry Pan Ceramic Cookware With Stainless Steel Handles

Good

Lower concern ceramic cookware; brand silent on PFAS.

Verdict · SkipCeramic cookware with established non-stick durability; no recalled lead/cadmium hazards on record. Stainless steel handles lower burn risk. PFAS profile acceptable for category.

Pyrex ceramic cookware has lower inherent PFAS risk versus traditional nonstick. Brand provides no PFAS disclosure, leaving coating details unconfirmed.

The better-graded swap

Heritage Steel Eater 12" Fry Pan with Lid

Heritage Steel

Heritage Steel Eater 12" Fry Pan with Lid

100/100 safety

100Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Ceramic coating, stainless steel handles

Lab data

No public lab test

Are Pyrex 10-Inch Fry Pan Ceramic Cookware non-toxic? What it is made of

This pan uses a ceramic coating applied over a glass or ceramic base body, with stainless steel handles. Ceramic coatings do not contain Teflon-type coating (Teflon) and do not emit the fumes associated with overheated traditional non-stick. Stainless steel handles eliminate the burn-through risk of plastic or silicone handles under sustained heat. The ceramic material itself is inherently inert once cured.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
⏳

Ceramic coating degradation and microabrasion

Ceramic coatings are susceptible to chipping, flaking, and wear over time, especially with abrasive cleaning or metal utensils. Fragments ingested are not toxic, but coating loss exposes the underlying body and reduces non-stick performance, increasing food sticking and potential need for higher cooking temperatures.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
🧠

Lead

No recalls or test reports linking Pyrex ceramic cookware to lead or cadmium leaching. However, Pyrex does not publish independent testing or safety certifications for coating composition, so absence of reports does not confirm freedom from trace metals.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100
✅

Teflon-type coating fume risk

Ceramic coatings do not contain Teflon-type coating, so there is no risk of polymer fume fever from overheating. This is a material advantage over traditional Teflon-coated pans.

95/ 100
✅

Aluminum leaching

Pyrex ceramic cookware does not advertise aluminum construction; the coating and base are ceramic or glass-based. If the substrate is glass or cast iron, aluminum leaching is not a concern for this product.

95/ 100
✅

Stainless steel handle durability and burn hazard

Stainless steel handles conduct heat more than silicone or phenolic alternatives, requiring a potholder for extended stovetop use. No recalls or burn incidents specific to Pyrex handles are on record; this is a normal user responsibility, not a manufacturing defect.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

Pyrex is owned by Instant Brands and has a long-established consumer presence in cookware and bakeware. The brand does not publish detailed safety disclosures or third-party certifications for heavy metals in ceramic coatings, and makes no public statement on PFAS use. No major recalls for lead or cadmium in recent ceramic cookware lines are on record, but the absence of disclosure limits verification of coating composition.

How it compares in its category

Ceramic non-stick cookware sits in the mid-market safety tier, it avoids Teflon-type coating volatilization hazards common in older Teflon cookware, but ceramic coatings are more prone to chipping and degradation than seasoned cast iron or stainless steel. Pyrex ceramic is typically mid-range in durability; some competitors (e.g., GreenPan, Our Place) market ceramic as premium and publish third-party test results. Uncoated stainless steel cookware remains the most conservative choice if coating integrity is a concern.

If you buy it

Avoid preheating empty or at high heat for extended periods; ceramic performs best at medium to medium-high temperatures. Hand wash when possible to preserve the coating; abrasive scrubbing or dishwasher use accelerates chipping. Inspect the coating monthly for cracks or white streaks (signs of degradation or water seepage into the base); discard if significant damage is visible. Replace within 3-5 years if the non-stick surface becomes noticeably sticky or food sticks consistently.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Pyrex has made a specific claim

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Cookware

Made In Stainless Clad Fry Pan

Made In

Stainless Clad Fry Pan

100ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Stainless steel clad construction, no nonstick coating
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Clad separation or delamination over time
MADE IN 10' Stainless Clad Frying Pan

Made In

10' Stainless Clad Frying Pan

100ExcellentPFAS grade
  • stainless steel clad construction, no nonstick coating
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Nickel leaching from stainless steel

3 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

Heritage Steel Eater Fry Pan

Heritage Steel

Eater Fry Pan

100ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Clad stainless steel, no coating
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Metal ion release during cooking (iron, nickel, chromium)

More cookware grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.