Amazon.com: Rare Beauty Makeup
No PFAS data available; cosmetics rarely contain PFAS but brand discloses nothing.
Rare Beauty makeup formulations lack published PFAS disclosures. Most cosmetics pose lower concern, but brand transparency on chemical composition is absent.
The better-graded swap
Chanel
Chanel Les Beiges Healthy Glow Foundation Hydration and Longwear
75/100 safety
Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
pigments, waxes, oils, polymers (unspecified)
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
You may also be interested in
Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.
- polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial growth in spent cartridges
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Aquasure
Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System
- RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Avocado
Vegan Mattress
- organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Heavy metals
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
What Amazon.com: Rare Beauty Makeup is made of, ingredients and materials
Rare Beauty makeup products use pigments, waxes, oils, and polymers typical of mainstream color cosmetics. The brand does not publicly specify pigment sources, polymer types, or detailed ingredient lists beyond regulatory minimums. Without ingredient transparency, trace contaminants in pigments (such as heavy metals) or sensitizing polymers cannot be independently assessed.
What’s concerning
Category baseline
The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.
Lead
Color cosmetics routinely contain trace metals from mineral pigments; Rare Beauty does not publish heavy metal testing results, so contamination risk cannot be ruled out but is typical for the category.
Source, ATSDR ↗Fragrance allergens and undisclosed fragrance components
Rare Beauty products list 'fragrance' as an ingredient; individual fragrance constituents (limonene, eugenol, geraniol, etc.) are not named, leaving allergic individuals unable to predict sensitivization risk.
Microplastic or polymer particles
Rare Beauty's use of polymers is confirmed but the specific types (PEG-based, polyethylene beads, film-formers) are not disclosed; microplastic content in rinse-off products is low concern, but true composition is opaque.
What’s reassuring
1,4-dioxane as a byproduct in emulsifiers or polymer processing
No specific record of 1,4-dioxane in Rare Beauty products; the brand does not disclose emulsifier or polymer processing details, so presence or absence cannot be independently verified.
Formaldehyde / VOCs
Mainstream cosmetics typically avoid direct formaldehyde; Rare Beauty does not publish preservative agent names, so formaldehyde-releaser risk is unquantified but consistent with industry practice.
Source, ATSDR ↗How is this PFAS grade calculated?
The brand's record and disclosure
Rare Beauty (Selena Gomez's brand, owned by medium-sized private investor) maintains no visible public stance on PFAS, ingredient sourcing, or third-party testing. The brand publishes ingredient lists on product pages but does not offer extended safety data, certifications (e.g., cruelty-free, hypoallergenic claims are marketing-level only), or toxicology summaries. No major recalls or safety controversies are established on record for the brand.
How it compares in its category
Rare Beauty sits in the mainstream premium cosmetics tier, with ingredient transparency comparable to brands like Fenty Beauty and Morphe, though below indie/clean brands that provide allergen warnings and heavy metal testing results. Rare Beauty's lack of third-party certification or published safety data is consistent with most mass-market color cosmetics, not an outlier.
If you buy it
Patch test on inner arm 24 hours before full facial use, especially if you have sensitive skin or known fragrance/dye allergies. Do not use if applicator, wand, or packaging shows visible mold or separation after storage. Discontinue if rash, itching, or irritation develops. Store in cool, dry conditions away from direct heat or sunlight to prevent polymer or wax degradation.
What is not known about PFAS in this product?
- Basis
- Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- Rare Beauty has made none
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Amazon.com: Rare Beauty Makeup?
- water, hyaluronic acid, glycerin, pigments, emollients
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- 1,4-dioxane contamination from emulsifiers
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
- pigments, oils, waxes, polymers (standard cosmetic formulations)
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Fragrance allergens or 1,4-dioxane in fragrances
- pigments, waxes, oils, talc, mica
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Fragrance allergens
More makeup grades
How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.