PFAS100/ 100Excellent
Overall88/ 100Excellent
Raw Elements Face & Body Sunscreen Tin SPF 30

Raw Elements · Sunscreen

Raw Elements Face & Body Sunscreen Tin SPF 30

Excellent

Low risk. Mineral formula plus explicit PFAS-free stance and certs lower concern.

Verdict: BuyMineral sunscreen with explicit PFAS-free positioning, third-party certifications, and no established safety controversies; tin packaging avoids common leaching concerns.

Mineral actives and tin packaging eliminate plastic coating concerns. The brand explicitly positions itself as PFAS-free with MADE SAFE certification supporting the claim.

Brand says: “PFAS-free formulation; Raw Elements explicitly markets products free of PFAS, fluorinated compounds, and synthetic chemicals

MADE SAFE CertifiedReef Safe Certified
Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

mineral sunscreen (zinc oxide/titanium dioxide), tin packaging

Brand disclosure

Brand claims PFAS-free

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
🍳

Epoxy resin coating in tin lining

Tin cans sometimes use internal epoxy linings that could theoretically leach trace amounts of bisphenol A (BPA) or other phenolic compounds into oily products. Raw Elements has not published testing or confirmation of BPA-free lining, though mineral sunscreen formulations are not highly lipophilic and present lower migration risk than oils or fatty foods.

70/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Raw Elements formulations typically contain essential oils or natural fragrance compounds; while generally milder than synthetic fragrances, they can trigger contact dermatitis or photosensitivity in sensitized individuals. The brand does not always disclose specific fragrance components on labels.

70/ 100
💨

Nano particle inhalation from loose powder form

If the product sheds powder during application or storage, inhalation of nano-sized zinc oxide or titanium dioxide particles presents a theoretical occupational hazard. The tin format reduces airborne exposure compared to loose powder sunscreens, though users with respiratory sensitivity should avoid shaking the container directly near the face.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Third-party PFAS-free verification

A third party independently verified this product is PFAS-free.

100/ 100

Safe base material

Made from ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber with no PFAS risk.

100/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Zinc oxide and titanium dioxide are tightly regulated in cosmetics and do not typically contain arsenic, lead, or cadmium when sourced from reputable suppliers. No recalls or contamination reports exist for Raw Elements products.

Source: FDA
95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Mineral sunscreens with minimal water content and simple ingredient lists are less likely to require formaldehyde-releasing preservatives compared to emulsified or water-based formulations. No public records indicate Raw Elements uses DMDM hydantoin, imidazolidinyl urea, or other releasers.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Raw Elements Face & Body uses zinc oxide and titanium dioxide as active UV filters, which sit on the skin surface rather than absorbing into it. These minerals are generally recognized as safe (GRAS) by the FDA and do not require systemic absorption to work. The tin packaging (rather than plastic or glass) eliminates concern over BPA, phthalates, or microplastics from the container itself, though tin linings are sometimes lined with epoxy resins that could theoretically contain trace heavy metals, though this is uncommon in food-grade cosmetic tins.

The brand's record and disclosure

Raw Elements explicitly markets itself as PFAS-free and holds third-party certifications including Non-GMO Project Verified and cruelty-free status, signaling transparency on ingredient sourcing. The brand has not faced major recalls or safety controversies in public records. Mineral sunscreen formulation itself is considered lower-risk compared to chemical sunscreens (which use oxybenzone, octinoxate, avobenzone, and similar systemically absorbed compounds), reflecting a deliberate product safety positioning.

How it compares in its category

Mineral sunscreens like this sit at the lower-risk end of the consumer sunscreen spectrum, avoiding synthetic UV absorbers that have faced regulatory scrutiny and environmental contamination concerns. Most mainstream sunscreens use chemical filters that absorb into the bloodstream; this product's non-nano zinc oxide and titanium dioxide approach is preferred by dermatologists for sensitive or compromised skin. The tin packaging is less common and avoids plastic waste concerns, though it adds cost and is heavier than alternatives.

If you buy it

Apply liberally and reapply every 2 hours, especially after water exposure or sweating; mineral sunscreens are not absorbed and sit as a physical barrier, so full coverage is essential for effectiveness. Store in a cool, dry place to prevent the base oils from separating or rancidifying, which can reduce performance. Tin containers are durable and will not degrade like plastic over time, though you should not store it in direct heat or sun between uses. Discontinue use if any irritation develops, though mineral formulations are unlikely to cause reactions compared to chemical alternatives.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 82% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Raw Elements has made a specific claim

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More sunscreen grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.