Conditioner Frizz Dismiss Redken
Low-Medium risk. Rinse-off conditioner with no identified PFAS signals.
This rinse-off conditioner shows no disclosed PFAS-prone ingredients like waterproofing or grease-resistant coatings. Redken doesn't address PFAS publicly and lacks third-party verification, though rinse-off products typically pose lower exposure than leave-on formulas.
We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade
Material
Aqueous conditioning emulsion (water, oils, silicones, polymers)
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
You may also be interested in
Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.
- polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial growth in spent cartridges
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Aquasure
Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System
- RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Avocado
Vegan Mattress
- organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Heavy metals
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
What Conditioner Frizz Dismiss Redken is made of, ingredients and materials
Redken Frizz Dismiss is an aqueous emulsion combining water, conditioning oils (typically silicones and plant-derived oils), polymers for texture, and standard cosmetic preservatives. The silicone base (likely dimethicone or cyclomethicone) is common in rinse-off conditioners and does not bioaccumulate or cross skin barriers meaningfully in leave-on rinse contexts. Polymers add slip and frizz control but are inert once rinsed away; they do not absorb into skin or scalp. This formulation class carries minimal hazard because it is designed to be washed out within minutes.
What’s concerning
Category baseline
The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.
Fragrance allergens
Redken Frizz Dismiss contains added fragrance (listed generically on labels); common fragrance compounds can trigger contact dermatitis or sensitization in susceptible individuals. Rinse-off status limits exposure time, reducing risk versus leave-on products.
Silicone accumulation or scalp buildup
Repeated use of silicone-based conditioners can lead to gradual buildup on hair and scalp if rinsing is incomplete; this is cosmetic rather than toxicological but may cause dulling or flaking. Risk is minimized by thorough rinsing and periodic clarifying washes.
Contamination during storage or use
Water-based emulsions can support bacterial or mold growth if container is left open, wet, or stored in warm/humid bathrooms. Risk is user-controlled; proper storage and timely replacement mitigate this.
What’s reassuring
Base material not linked to PFAS
The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.
Formaldehyde / VOCs
No formaldehyde-releasing preservatives (e.g., imidazolidinyl urea, DMDM hydantoin) are publicly listed for this product. Standard preservatives used (e.g., methylchloroisothiazolinone, phenoxyethanol) are cosmetic-approved and present minimal risk in rinse-off formulations.
Source, ATSDR ↗Heavy metals
Conditioners in this category typically use iron oxides or mica for color; Redken does not source from known high-risk suppliers for these ingredients. No heavy metal contamination alerts are on record for this product.
Source, FDA ↗How is this PFAS grade calculated?
The brand's record and disclosure
Redken is owned by L'Oreal and operates under parent-company cosmetic safety frameworks, which include compliance with EU and US cosmetic ingredient bans and restricted lists. Redken does not publish a specific PFAS avoidance policy or third-party certification (e.g., EWG Verified, Leaping Bunny). The brand maintains standard ingredient disclosure through product labels and Safety Data Sheets but does not proactively communicate PFAS testing or commitments. No recalls or significant safety controversies are on record for this product line.
How it compares in its category
Frizz Dismiss sits in the mainstream premium conditioner tier, formulated similarly to competing brands (e.g., SheaMoisture, Cantu, Pantene Gold Series). Silicone-based conditioners are standard practice and carry no known hazard advantage over silicone-free alternatives; the choice is aesthetic preference. Redken's formulation is neither stricter nor laxer than category peers in disclosed ingredient practices. Price-point positioning and performance are drivers; safety profile is typical.
If you buy it
Use as directed, apply to damp hair lengths, leave for 1-3 minutes, rinse thoroughly with water. Ensure complete rinsing to avoid product buildup on scalp. Store in a cool, dry place away from direct heat or sunlight; keep container sealed between uses. Discontinue if scalp irritation or contact dermatitis occurs; this is rare but possible with any cosmetic. Replace every 12-18 months after opening to minimize bacterial or mold contamination risk.
What is not known about PFAS in this product?
- Basis
- Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- Redken has made none
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Conditioner Frizz Dismiss Redken?
- Water, conditioning agents, organic plant extracts
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Heavy metals
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
- water-based conditioner, typical surfactants and botanical extracts
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Heavy metals
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
More conditioner grades
How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.