PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall67/ 100Good
Redken Volume Injection Conditioner

Redken · Conditioner

Redken Volume Injection Conditioner

Excellent

Low-Medium risk. Standard rinse-off product with no known PFAS drivers.

Verdict: BuyStandard rinse-off conditioner with no established chemical hazards; lower exposure risk due to brief contact time and water-based formula.

This rinse-off conditioner has no disclosed PFAS ingredients or water-repellent coating/stain-resistant treatments, relying instead on standard conditioning polymers and emollients. Redken provides no PFAS transparency and third-party testing is unavailable.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

water-based conditioning polymers, emollients, surfactants

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens and irritants

Redken formulations typically contain fragrance blends (not specified as essential oils or synthetic); fragrance is a known contact allergen affecting 1-3% of the general population, particularly those with sensitive scalps or atopic dermatitis. Rinse-off format limits exposure compared to leave-on products.

70/ 100
⚠️

Silicone buildup and scalp irritation

Silicone-based conditioners can accumulate on hair and scalp over weeks of use, potentially trapping moisture and bacteria; this is a use-pattern risk rather than inherent toxicity. Risk is mitigated by periodic clarifying shampoo use (every 2-4 weeks) and is not established as a systemic health hazard.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber with no PFAS risk.

100/ 100

1,4-dioxane contamination

No documented or reported cases of 1,4-dioxane in Redken Volume Injection Conditioner. However, this impurity can form during manufacture of polyethylene glycol-based emulsifiers if not tightly controlled; Redken does not publish manufacturing controls or third-party testing for this contaminant.

95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Standard cosmetic-grade preservatives and FDA-approved colorants carry minimal heavy metal risk at cosmetic use levels. No recalls or independent testing have identified lead, cadmium, or arsenic in Redken conditioners, though the brand does not disclose third-party heavy metal testing.

Source: FDA
95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Redken does not appear to use imidazolidinyl urea, dmdm hydantoin, or other formaldehyde-releasing preservatives in this product line based on available ingredient lists, though the brand does not formally certify formaldehyde-releaser-free status.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Redken Volume Injection Conditioner is formulated primarily with water, conditioning polymers (likely acrylates or silicones), emollients, and standard cosmetic surfactants. These ingredients are designed to coat and smooth the hair shaft rather than penetrate skin, which significantly reduces systemic absorption risk compared to leave-on products. The water-based matrix means volatile organic compounds are minimal, and the rinse-off application pattern (seconds to minutes on wet hair) limits skin and scalp contact time.

The brand's record and disclosure

Redken (L'Oreal subsidiary) does not publicly disclose formulation details, allergen-testing protocols, or independent safety certifications for this product line. The brand does not advertise paraben-free, sulfate-free, or fragrance-transparency commitments as standard practice. No recalls or regulatory warnings have been issued for this specific product in publicly available sources. Redken relies on compliance with FDA and EU cosmetic regulations rather than proactive ingredient transparency.

How it compares in its category

Volume conditioners in this price range typically use identical polymer and silicone-based conditioning systems; Redken's formulation is conventional for mass-market hair care. Brands like SheaMoisture and Cantu offer similar conditioning performance with slightly higher transparency on botanical ingredients, though efficacy data does not show material safety differences. Prestige and salon-only alternatives (Olaplex, Briogeo) market cleaner ingredient lists but at 2-3x cost without established superiority in toxicological safety.

If you buy it

Apply only to damp hair lengths and ends, rinse thoroughly within 2-3 minutes, and avoid contact with eyes and broken skin. Do not apply heat (blow dryers, straighteners) immediately after; allow hair to air-dry for 10 minutes first to prevent localized heating of residual product. Discontinue use if scalp irritation or contact dermatitis develops; fragrance sensitivity is the most common adverse reaction in this category. No special storage precautions needed beyond standard room temperature away from direct sunlight.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Redken has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More conditioner grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.