Reebok · Stain-Resistant Professional Workwear
Reebok Men's Big & Tall Shades Performance Polo Shirt
Standard polo without explicit treatment, but Reebok discloses nothing.
Synthetic performance polo with no explicit water-resistant treatment marketed. Reebok stays silent on PFAS and any applied treatments.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Polyester blend performance fabric
Lab data
No public lab test
You may also be interested in
Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.
- polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial growth in spent cartridges
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Aquasure
Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System
- RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Avocado
Vegan Mattress
- organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Heavy metals
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
What Reebok Men's Big & Tall Shades Polo Shirt is made of, ingredients and materials
This is a polyester blend performance fabric, likely polyester with elastane or nylon for stretch and moisture-wicking. Polyester itself is synthetic and stable, but the finishing processes (dyeing, wrinkle resistance, water repellency) introduce chemical risk. The 'performance' designation suggests water-repellent or anti-microbial treatments, which may include durable water repellents (water-repellent coating) such as fluorocarbons, though Reebok discloses nothing about this specific garment.
What’s concerning
Category baseline
The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.
Formaldehyde / VOCs
Polyester performance fabrics are commonly treated with formaldehyde-based resins for wrinkle resistance and shape retention. Reebok does not disclose finishing chemistry for this polo. Off-gassing is highest in unwashed new garments and diminishes with laundering.
Source, ATSDR ↗Azo dyes
No certification (OEKO-TEX, GOTS) is stated for this product. Conventional azo dyes are standard in mass-market athletic wear and carry a small risk of skin contact allergies in sensitive individuals, particularly if dye is not fully fixed.
water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coatings
The 'performance' designation may indicate water-repellent treatment. Reebok does not specify whether fluorocarbon or fluorine-free water-repellent coating is used. Fluorocarbon treatments can release PFOA-class chemicals under heat or wear; fluorine-free alternatives (wax-based, silicone) avoid this but are less durable.
Elastane (spandex) degradation
The blend likely includes elastane for stretch. Elastane degrades with heat, chlorine, and UV exposure, shortening garment life. Degraded elastane can shed microfibers into wash water, though systemic health impact from microfiber shedding remains uncertain.
What’s reassuring
Base material not linked to PFAS
The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.
Antimony in polyester
Antimony is a catalyst used in polyester production and typically remains residual in the fiber. No recalls or elevated exposures specific to Reebok polyester products are on record; this is inherent to polyester chemistry across the industry.
How is this PFAS grade calculated?
The brand's record and disclosure
Reebok is owned by Authentic Brands Group (formerly Adidas). The brand has made limited public commitments to chemical safety compared to competitors like Nike or Patagonia. No specific certifications (such as GOTS, OEKO-TEX, or Bluesign) are known to apply to this line. Reebok does not publish transparency reports on water repellent treatments, dyes, or formaldehyde use in production.
How it compares in its category
Men's performance polos at this price point are broadly similar in chemical footprint. Branded athletic wear typically relies on conventional azo dyes and formaldehyde-based wrinkle finishes. Premium alternatives (e.g., Patagonia, Arc'teryx) often use certified low-impact dyes and disclose water-repellent coating chemistry; budget mass-market options (Old Navy, Gap) have comparable undisclosed risks. Reebok sits in the middle with no transparency advantage.
If you buy it
Wash before first wear in cool water to reduce loose dyes and formaldehyde residues. Use mild detergent and avoid hot water, which can accelerate fabric degradation and chemical release from polyester blends. Dry on low heat or air dry; high heat stresses elastane and may mobilize coating chemicals. Replace when fabric pilling, elasticity loss, or odor persistence occurs (typically 50-100 washes for performance wear).
What is not known about PFAS in this product?
- Basis
- Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- Reebok has made a specific claim
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
More stain-resistant professional workwear grades
How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.