PFAS50/ 100Good
Overall28/ 100Poor
Haida Greystone Multicoated UV Filter

Haida · Waterproof Camera & Lens Protection Cases

Haida Greystone Multicoated UV Filter

Good

Coating details missing and PFAS risk unconfirmed.

Verdict · SkipOptical glass UV filter with unclear multicoat composition; no established toxicity risks in normal use, but Samsung's silent PFAS stance and coating opacity warrant caution.

This UV filter's multicoat isn't publicly detailed. Some multicoat optics use fluorinated compounds, but the brand gives no answers.

The better-graded swap

PolarPro Circular Polarizer Filter for GoPro HERO

GoPro

PolarPro Circular Polarizer Filter for GoPro HERO

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Optical glass with multicoated UV filter

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

Vague safety claims only

Uses vague language ("eco-friendly", "clean") without a specific PFAS statement.

85/ 100
♾️

Unknown / proprietary coating

A coating is recorded with no disclosed chemistry.

75/ 100
🍂

Coating delamination and wear

Multilayer optical coatings can separate or flake at edges or with repeated cleaning, potentially generating microscopic particles. No specific failure data exists for this Samsung model, but optical glass coatings are known to degrade after 5-10 years of use depending on storage and handling.

70/ 100
🎨

Heavy metals

Metal oxide multicoatings may incorporate trace metals (titanium, aluminum, or rare earths) or metal-based adhesion promoters. Since composition is undisclosed, the presence and bioavailability of any heavy metals cannot be ruled out; however, the coating is sealed and not in contact with food or skin during normal use.

Source, FDA
70/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Some premium optical coatings use Teflon-family coating binders to improve water and oil repellence. Samsung's silence on coating ingredients leaves this unresolved; industry use of Teflon-type coating-based primers on high-end filters is documented but not confirmed for this model.

Source, ATSDR
45/ 100
⚠️

Biofilm or fungal growth on lens surface

Humid storage or condensation can allow algae or mold to colonize the coating surface, particularly if the filter is left damp. This is a cleanliness issue rather than a chemical toxicity hazard, but compromises function and may require aggressive cleaning.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Off-gassing or volatile organic compound release

Optical glass and cured coating systems do not typically release volatile organics after manufacturing. No reports of odor, fume, or respiratory symptoms from UV filter use exist in public records.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This is optical-grade glass with a multilayer anti-reflective and UV-blocking coating applied to the surface. The base glass itself (silica-based) is not a material linked to PFAS; the risk sits entirely in the coating layers, which Samsung does not publicly specify. Typical multicoatings for UV filters use metal oxides (titanium dioxide, silicon dioxide, aluminum oxide) or proprietary polymers, but without ingredient disclosure, the exact composition and any fluorinated compounds remain unknown.

The brand's record and disclosure

Samsung has not published ingredient lists, material safety data sheets, or PFAS-avoidance commitments for this optical component. The company's broader camera and electronics divisions have faced environmental scrutiny but have not faced specific recalls tied to lens coatings. Absence of transparency on coating chemistry is the core concern; this is not a widely used consumer-facing product, so public testing and third-party certification data are minimal.

How it compares in its category

Optical filters and coatings are rarely subject to consumer safety testing, unlike cookware or textiles. Most UV filter manufacturers (Canon, Nikon, Zeiss, Hoya) similarly withhold detailed coating formulations as proprietary. This product is neither ahead of nor behind industry norms for transparency; the entire category operates with minimal public disclosure. For photography enthusiasts, reputation-based brand choice is the main differentiator rather than published safety data.

If you buy it

Handle the filter by the barrel or frame edge, never touch the coated surfaces, as skin oils and dust degrade the coating and reduce UV blocking efficiency over time. Store in a dry, cool place away from direct sunlight and extreme temperature swings, as thermal stress can cause coating delamination. Clean only with lens-grade microfiber cloths and appropriate optical cleaning solution; harsh solvents may interact with the coating binder. Replace if you notice visible scratches, clouding, or reflective discoloration, as the protective layers have failed.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Haida has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Waterproof Camera & Lens Protection Cases

Think Tank Digital Holster 5 V3

Think Tank Photo

Think Tank Digital Holster 5 V3

Ballistic nylon, weather-sealed fabric, metal hardware

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
🏷️

Undisclosed water-repellent coating chemistry

Limited concern

70

Coating degradation over time

Limited concern

70

Camera holster with weather treatment; PFAS status undisclosed.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Nikon WP-CP3 Marine Case for Camera

Nikon

WP-CP3 Marine Case for Camera

Polycarbonate/rubber with waterproof seals

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade73Good

Polycarbonate degradation over time

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Rubber gasket hardening and seal failure

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Microbial growth in sealed moisture pockets

Limited concern

70

No coating described, and no PFAS statement from the brand.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Nikon WP-N1 Waterproof Housing

Nikon

WP-N1 Waterproof Housing

Polycarbonate housing with waterproof seals

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade77Excellent

Gasket material degradation

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Polycarbonate microcracking or crazing

Limited concern

70

No coating described, and no PFAS statement from the brand.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More waterproof camera & lens protection cases grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.