PFAS30/ 100Poor
Overall4/ 100Bad
Sigma Beauty Liquid Lipstick

Sigma Beauty · Lip Balm & Long-Wear Lipstick

Sigma Beauty Liquid Lipstick

Poor

No public PFAS disclosure. Waterproof cosmetics commonly use PFAS; uncertain without testing.

Verdict · SkipLiquid lipstick with silent PFAS stance and waterproofing agents raises moderate concern; no major brand recalls on record, but limited transparency on pigment sourcing and preservatives warrants cautious use.

Sigma Beauty does not publicly disclose PFAS use or absence in this liquid lipstick. Waterproof cosmetics frequently contain fluorinated compounds; lack of transparency prevents confident assessment.

The better-graded swap

Wet n Wild Lip Oil

Wet n Wild

Wet n Wild Lip Oil

75/100 safety

75Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

liquid pigment blend, waterproofing agents unspecified

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Sigma Beauty Liquid Lipstick is made of, ingredients and materials

Sigma Beauty Liquid Lipstick is a pigment suspension in a polymer-resin base with unspecified waterproofing agents, likely acrylates or similar film-formers. Waterproof cosmetics commonly rely on PFAS-based water repellents to maintain wear; Sigma has not publicly disclosed their waterproofing chemistry, leaving uncertainty about PFAS content. The liquid format means pigments and preservatives must remain stable and suspended over months of shelf life, requiring careful formulation to avoid separation or microbial growth.

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🧠

Lead

Cosmetic-grade iron oxides and synthetic colorants used in lipsticks are not routinely tested for heavy-metal contamination by all manufacturers. Sigma does not publish metal-testing data; PFDA color additives are regulated but not exhaustively tested for trace contamination at manufacturing.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Liquid lipsticks commonly use formaldehyde releasers (e.g., DMDM hydantoin, imidazolidinyl urea) to prevent microbial growth; Sigma's ingredient list does not disclose the specific preservative system, so exposure risk cannot be ruled out.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100
🏷️

Fragrance allergens and undisclosed components

Sigma Beauty liquid lipsticks are fragranced; fragrance is a known skin sensitizer and allergen source, but individual fragrance components are not disclosed (IFRA trade secret allowance). Individuals with fragrance sensitivity or atopic dermatitis face elevated risk.

70/ 100
⚠️

1,4-dioxane contamination (from ethoxylated emulsifiers)

Acrylate-based waterproofing agents often require ethoxylated emulsifiers to stabilize the polymer-pigment suspension; these can carry 1,4-dioxane as a manufacturing byproduct. Sigma does not disclose emulsifier sourcing or distillation practices.

70/ 100
🫧

Microplastic particle shedding during wear

Liquid lipsticks shed polymeric film particles as they wear and flake; ingestion of these particles during eating or drinking is unavoidable. No specific data exists for Sigma products, but the polymer-based formula structure makes shedding a material concern over repeated daily use.

45/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Sigma Beauty has not published ingredient sourcing transparency, PFAS avoidance commitments, or safety certifications (e.g., COSMOS, Leaping Bunny). No major product recalls specific to this lipstick line are on public record. The brand markets to makeup artists and consumers but does not disclose preservative systems, pigment suppliers, or heavy-metal testing protocols, which limits independent verification of safety compliance.

How it compares in its category

Liquid lipsticks are inherently higher-risk for PFAS exposure because waterproofing is a core marketing feature; brands like MAC Fix+ or Fenty Beauty also do not disclose PFAS status. Sigma's lack of third-party certification (unlike some indie brands pursuing clean-beauty labeling) places it in the middle of the transparency spectrum. Compared to traditional cream or bullet lipsticks, liquid formulas require more aggressive preservation and film-forming chemistry, increasing complexity and potential exposures.

If you buy it

Apply only to lips; avoid ingestion and contact with eyes and mucous membranes. Do not use if you have a history of contact dermatitis or sensitivity to acrylates or fragrance. Replace every 12-18 months or if the formula separates, thickens, or develops odor, as preservative breakdown can increase bacterial contamination risk. Store in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight to slow oxidation and preserve the waterproofing layer.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Sigma Beauty has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Sigma Beauty Liquid Lipstick?

BECCA x Chrissy Teigen Glow Gloss

Becca Cosmetics

BECCA x Chrissy Teigen Glow Gloss

75ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Glycerin, silicones, pigments, film-formers (typical liquid cosmetic gloss)
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Fragrance allergens and undisclosed components
  • Liquid lipstick, likely pigments, oils, and waxes
  • Fragrance allergens or sensitizers
  • Natural waxes and oils (beeswax, plant oils, pigments)
  • Lead

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

More lip balm & long-wear lipstick grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.