PFAS50/ 100Good
Overall38/ 100Poor
Spiderwire Stealth Braid Line

Spiderwire · Fishing Line

Spiderwire Stealth Braid Line

Good

Skip or contact SpiderWire; braided lines often use PFAS-based water-repellent coatings.

Verdict: SkipBraided polyethylene line with silent PFAS stance; no other major hazards documented, but verify coating composition before purchase.

Braided polyethylene designed for water resistance and durability, but SpiderWire makes no PFAS disclosure. Braided synthetics frequently receive water-repellent coating treatments historically containing PFAS.

The safe swap

BERKLEY TRILENE BIG GAME

Berkley

BERKLEY TRILENE BIG GAME

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Braided polyethylene fiber with unknown coating/treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Unknown / proprietary coating

Has a special coating but the exact formula is secret.

75/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Braided fishing lines commonly use PFAS-based Teflon-family coating coatings for water and abrasion resistance. Spiderwire has not disclosed coating composition; the Stealth line's treatment is presumed but unconfirmed.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding from coating degradation

As the coating wears or breaks down under UV, tension, and abrasion, small particles may shed into water. Long-term shedding rates and particle size for Spiderwire Stealth are not documented.

70/ 100
🏷️

Undisclosed additives in proprietary coating

The Stealth line's coating remains proprietary; additives, UV absorbers, colorants, or slip agents are not declared and cannot be assessed without manufacturer data or third-party lab analysis.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Polyethylene core stability under heat or pressure

Braided PE is thermally stable during normal fishing use (room temperature water). No reported failures or leaching under standard conditions, though sustained sunlight exposure can degrade any polymer over years.

95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

No published testing of Spiderwire Stealth for lead, cadmium, or other metals in dyes or manufacturing additives. Fishing lines are not regulated for this as food-contact materials.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Spiderwire Stealth Braid is a braided polyethylene (PE) fiber core, which is chemically stable and non-toxic under normal fishing use. The "Stealth" designation typically indicates a coating or treatment applied for water repellence, UV protection, or camouflage, this coating composition is proprietary and not disclosed publicly. Braided lines are inherently more durable than monofilament but require specific coating chemistry to resist moisture absorption and algae growth; the exact nature of Spiderwire's coating is unknown.

The brand's record and disclosure

Spiderwire (owned by Pure Fishing) does not publish material safety data sheets or ingredient transparency for fishing lines. No independent lab testing of Spiderwire Stealth Braid for heavy metals, Teflon-type coating off-gassing, or contaminants has been published in consumer safety databases. The brand's silence on PFAS and coating chemistry is standard for the fishing line industry but leaves end-users without verification of safety claims.

How it compares in its category

Braided PE lines like Spiderwire Stealth occupy the mid-to-premium segment; they are more visible in water than monofilament but offer superior strength-to-diameter ratio. Most braided lines use some form of water-resistant coating, and PFAS-based Teflon-family coating treatments are common in this category, though non-fluorinated alternatives (silicone, wax) exist. Spiderwire does not differentiate itself as PFAS-free or eco-certified, placing it among mainstream offerings with unverified coating safety.

If you buy it

Store line in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight to slow coating degradation and UV breakdown. Inspect the line for whitening, brittleness, or coating flaking before each use; replace if degradation is visible. Rinse line with fresh water after saltwater use to reduce algae and bacteria colonization on the braided surface. If you have concerns about PFAS or coating chemistry, contact Spiderwire directly to request material safety documentation before purchasing.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Spiderwire has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Fishing Line

BERKLEY TRILENE BIG GAME

Berkley

TRILENE BIG GAME

monofilament nylon fishing line

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade63Good

UV degradation and embrittlement

High concern

20
🫧

Microplastic release during use

Limited concern

70

Low concern for standard monofilament with no coating triggers.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Berkley Trilene Big Game Braid

Berkley

Trilene Big Game Braid

Braided polyethylene fishing line

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade81Excellent
🫧

Polyethylene microfiber shedding

Limited concern

70

Low concern; braided polyethylene is not a typical PFAS application.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Berkley Trilene XT Monofilament Fishing Line

Berkley

Trilene XT Monofilament Fishing Line

Nylon monofilament (extruded polymer)

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade67Good
🫧

Nylon polymer degradation and microplastic release

Limited concern

70
⚠️

UV stabilizer additives in polymer matrix

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Skin irritation or eye contact from monofilament filament

Moderate concern

45

Low concern for basic nylon line without water-repellent coating or special coatings.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More fishing line grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.