PFAS85/ 100Excellent
Overall55/ 100Good
Swatch Scubaqua Aurelia Aurita Skeleton Quartz Watch

Swatch · Waterproof Smartphone Cases

Swatch Scubaqua Aurelia Aurita Skeleton Quartz Watch

Excellent

Water-resistant watch likely contains PFAS in seals; Swatch says nothing.

Verdict · SkipStainless steel watch with mineral glass poses minimal non-PFAS chemical risks; PFAS in seals is the primary concern, not disclosed by Swatch.

This water-resistant quartz watch uses stainless steel and rubber components. Waterproof seals frequently contain PFAS, but Swatch shares no material information.

The better-graded swap

Fitbit Sense Smartwatch

Fitbit

Fitbit Sense Smartwatch

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

stainless steel case, synthetic rubber strap, mineral glass with water-resistant seal

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What Swatch Scubaqua Aurelia Aurita Skeleton is made of, ingredients and materials

This Swatch features a stainless steel case, synthetic rubber strap, and mineral glass crystal. Stainless steel is chemically inert and does not leach heavy metals under normal wear. Mineral glass is harder than acrylic but can scratch; it does not contain lead in modern production. Synthetic rubber straps (typically nitrile or similar elastomers) do not off-gas volatile organics at skin temperature, though some dyes or processing residues may be present. The water-resistant seal almost certainly contains PFAS compounds, which Swatch does not publicly disclose.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Water-resistant watches typically use PFOA or similar PFAS in gaskets and adhesive sealants. Swatch does not disclose seal composition; skin contact is low-risk but microabrasion over years may release trace amounts. No acute toxicity expected from wearing the watch.

Source, ATSDR ↗
20/ 100
⏳

Synthetic rubber strap degradation

Synthetic rubber can break down over 3-5 years with UV and sweat exposure, potentially releasing small amounts of residual processing chemicals. Risk is minimal at skin temperature and pH; degradation is primarily a durability issue.

70/ 100
⛏️

Stainless steel nickel leaching

Stainless steel typically contains 8-12% nickel. While most alloys resist leaching under dry conditions, prolonged sweat exposure may cause trace nickel release in sensitive individuals. Risk is low for most wearers but possible for nickel-allergic persons.

70/ 100
⚠️

Bacterial growth in water-resistant seal

If the water-resistant seal is breached or moisture accumulates, bacteria or mold may grow in the sealed cavity. This is a mechanical/hygiene issue, not a chemical hazard, but relevant to long-term safety.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
✅

Mineral glass surface contamination

Mineral glass itself is chemically stable and lead-free in modern production. No public record of contamination or coating hazards in Swatch mineral glass crystals.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

Swatch has not published comprehensive chemical disclosure statements or pursued third-party certifications (e.g., BlueSign, Cradle to Cradle) for watch components. The company has faced scrutiny over supply chain transparency but no major recalls for chemical hazards in watches have been documented in public records. Swatch remains silent on PFAS use in waterproofing seals, which is standard industry practice for water-resistant watches. No established controversies regarding heavy metals, phthalates, or formaldehyde in Swatch watches are on record.

How it compares in its category

Quartz watches in the affordable range (under $300) rarely disclose seal composition; PFAS in waterproof seals is nearly universal and unregulated. Stainless steel cases present lower concern than painted or plated metals that may shed coating or contain cadmium. Mineral glass is a durable middle ground between acrylic (scratch-prone, lower safety risk) and sapphire (more expensive, no chemical advantage). Swatch's transparency is typical of mass-market watch makers, not superior.

If you buy it

Wear the watch normally; stainless steel and rubber strap contact with skin poses minimal acute risk from known chemical hazards. Do not expose the watch to prolonged heat above 60 degrees Celsius, as synthetic rubber can degrade and potentiate leaching (though this is unlikely at body temperature). Avoid prolonged submersion beyond the rated depth; repeated seal stress may accelerate PFAS release from the gasket over years of use. If the seal fails or rubber shows cracks, discontinue use and replace the strap or service the seal; degraded seals may allow water ingress and bacterial growth.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Swatch has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More waterproof smartphone cases grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.