Barbour averages 20 out of 100 on PFAS Authority's PFAS and toxin screen across the 4 Barbour products graded as of October 2026, and none of them reach its 70 point pass mark.
Free to quote with attribution to PFAS Authority and a link to pfasauthority.com/brands/barbour.
Barbour grades Bad on our four-band scale. On disclosure, the brand says nothing publicly about PFAS. See what every brand has published about PFAS for how that compares.
PFAS Authority is a scoring system, not a laboratory. We do not test products ourselves. Grades are model-based, built from published ingredients, materials, certifications, brand disclosures and third-party lab results where they exist. See the rubric.
Graded and flagged Poor and Bad, we’d swap these
Barbour
Chelsea Waterproof Jacket Mens
20BadPFAS grade
✓Waxed cotton blend with water-repellent coating finish
⚠We found no PFAS statement from the brand
⚠water-repellent coating finish (fluorochemical origin unclear), Traditional water-repellent coating finishes…
Barbour averages 20 out of 100 on PFAS Authority's PFAS and toxin screen across the 4 Barbour products graded as of October 2026, and none of them reach its 70 point pass mark. Grades are model-based estimates built from published materials, ingredients and disclosures, not lab tests.
Is Barbour non-toxic?
No Barbour product we graded reaches Good. The best of them is Barbour Chelsea Waterproof Jacket Mens at 20/100.
Which Barbour products should I avoid?
The lowest-graded Barbour products we have scored are Barbour Women's Audrey Showerproof Jacket, Barbour Women's Heron Waterproof Jacket, Barbour Women's Baythorpe Waterproof Jacket. Each one links to the evidence behind its grade.
