PFAS40/ 100Poor
Overall0/ 100Bad
303 Protectant

303 Protectant · Fabric Stain Guard Sprays

303 Protectant

Poor

Protectant spray composition unclear. PFAS risk unverified.

Verdict · Skip303 Protectant lacks transparent PFAS disclosure and full ingredient transparency; non-PFAS hazards appear minimal if used as directed, but water-repellent coatings carry inherent chemical uncertainty.

Water and UV protectant for vinyl and plastics without disclosed PFAS content or coating chemistry. No third-party testing available.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

UV protectant/water-repellent coating (unspecified polymers)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
⚠️

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from spray propellant and carriers

Aerosolized protectant sprays typically contain solvent carriers and propellants; inhalation during application is foreseeable, especially in enclosed spaces. 303 does not disclose VOC content or specific solvents, so exposure risk cannot be quantified but should be assumed.

20/ 100
⚠️

Skin and eye irritation from direct contact

Water-repellent sprays commonly cause mild irritation if applied directly to skin or eyes. 303 Protectant labeling warns against such contact, and adverse event rates appear low in typical use, but irritation remains a foreseeable hazard.

70/ 100
⚠️

Respiratory sensitization or irritation from repeated aerosol exposure

Chronic or repeated inhalation of spray coatings can trigger respiratory irritation in sensitive individuals. No specific allergic reactions or asthma-trigger reports are documented for 303 Protectant, but the risk is consistent with the product class and opaque formulation.

70/ 100

Incomplete biodegradability of polymer film residue

Water-repellent polymers applied to fabrics or outdoor surfaces may persist in soil and waterways. 303 does not disclose polymer biodegradability or environmental fate data, making long-term ecological impact unclear.

70/ 100
🏷️

Undisclosed chemical composition and potential unreported hazards

The lack of published full ingredient lists or PFAS testing creates a residual uncertainty hazard. Consumers cannot independently verify claims or assess personal sensitivity to unstated compounds; this is a transparency failure, not a confirmed chemical risk, but a material concern.

45/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

303 Protectant is a spray-applied UV and water-repellent coating marketed for automotive, marine, and fabric surfaces. The manufacturer does not publicly disclose the specific polymer chemistry, active ingredients, or carrier solvents, only describing it as a protective formula. Water-repellent treatments in this category typically rely on silicone-based or fluorocarbon-based compounds; the opacity around 303's formulation makes independent hazard assessment difficult. The product is aerosolized, meaning inhalation exposure is a primary route of concern.

The brand's record and disclosure

303 Products (maker of 303 Protectant) is a subsidiary of Clorox and has not published detailed safety data sheets, ingredient breakdowns, or PFAS testing results on their consumer-facing website. The brand has not made public commitments to PFAS phaseout or transparency initiatives common in the personal care and household products sector. While Clorox-owned brands have faced scrutiny over chemical transparency, 303 Protectant itself has no documented recalls or formal safety violations on public record for non-PFAS hazards.

How it compares in its category

303 Protectant is a mainstream, premium-positioned product in the UV/water-repellent coating spray category. Competitors range from silicone-based sprays (less PFAS risk but sometimes less durable) to ceramic coatings (more durable, variable PFAS status). Many alternatives similarly lack full transparency; however, some brands now offer PFAS-free or fluorine-free UV protectants. 303's market share and long history suggest it is well-tolerated in normal use, but it does not stand out for chemical transparency or verified PFAS avoidance.

If you buy it

Use 303 Protectant outdoors or in well-ventilated spaces to minimize inhalation of spray aerosol and any volatile organic compounds. Apply in thin, even coats; overuse does not improve protection and increases exposure. Test on a small, inconspicuous area first, especially on fabrics or unsealed surfaces, to check for darkening or staining. Reapply according to product directions (typically every 3-6 months for automotive use) and store in a cool, dry place away from heat or flame.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
303 Protectant has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Fabric Stain Guard Sprays

Nikwax Waterproofing Wax for Leather

Nikwax

Waterproofing Wax for Leather

wax-based waterproofing

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade51Good
💨

Respiratory irritation or fume inhalation during application

Limited concern

70
♾️

PFAS

Moderate concern

45

A water-repellent or grease-resistant treatment of unstated chemistry, with a brand PFAS statement we have not verified.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

Timberland Waximum Waxed Leather Protector

Timberland

Waximum Waxed Leather Protector

Wax-based leather protector

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade39Poor
⚠️

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from solvents

High concern

20
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🏷️

Skin sensitization from undisclosed additives

Limited concern

70

Wax coating lower concern than synthetic waterproofing, but unconfirmed.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Angelus Mink Oil Paste Leather Waterproofer and Contitioner 3 oz

Angelus

Mink Oil Paste Leather Waterproofer and Contitioner 3 oz

mink oil paste, natural oil-based conditioner

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade57Good
⚠️

Microbial growth (natural oil rancidity)

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Skin sensitization (mink oil allergenicity)

Limited concern

70

Lower concern; natural oil product unlikely to contain PFAS but unverified.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More fabric stain guard sprays grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.