Adidas · Golf Balls & Equipment
Adidas Aditech 24 Glove
Sports glove with water-resistant coating; PFAS risk unclear without brand disclosure.
Adidas Aditech 24 Glove likely uses water-repellent coating treatment common in athletic gear, which may contain PFAS. Adidas has not publicly disclosed PFAS content.
The better-graded swap
Bridgestone
Bridgestone Limited Edition Tour B RX Leaderboard Golf Balls
85/100 safety
Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Synthetic textile with water-repellent coating finish
Lab data
No public lab test
You may also be interested in
Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.
- polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial growth in spent cartridges
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Aquasure
Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System
- RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Avocado
Vegan Mattress
- organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Heavy metals
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
What Adidas Aditech 24 Glove is made of, ingredients and materials
Aditech 24 gloves use synthetic textiles (likely polyester or nylon blend) with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish applied to the outer surface. water-repellent coating coatings are designed to shed water without creating a waterproof membrane, making them common in athletic gloves. The chemistry of the water-repellent coating layer is not publicly disclosed by Adidas for this model, which creates uncertainty about whether fluorinated compounds (PFAS) or non-fluorinated alternatives were used.
What’s concerning
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.
Category baseline
The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
Formaldehyde / VOCs
Synthetic textiles often use formaldehyde-based cross-linking resins for wrinkle resistance and shape retention. No public data confirms formaldehyde use in Aditech 24 specifically, but the practice is common in budget-to-mid-range polyester blends. Direct skin contact over prolonged periods could pose low inhalation or dermal risk if present.
Source, ATSDR ↗water-repellent coating degradation and leaching
The undisclosed water-repellent coating finish may leach compounds into sweat or skin oils with repeated wear and washing, particularly if coatings contain siloxanes or other volatile organic compounds. Without chemical specification, risk cannot be quantified but is typical for treated athletic textiles.
Azo dyes in colored synthetic fabrics
Polyester and nylon blends in sports gloves are often dyed with azo compounds, some of which can break down into carcinogenic aromatic amines under skin moisture and friction. Adidas has not published testing data for this product line. Risk is low if dyes meet EU/ZDHC standards, but unverified.
Skin sensitization or irritation from finish chemicals
Anecdotal user reports on retail sites mention itching or rash after initial wear, which could reflect finish residue, dye sensitivity, or individual reaction. These incidents are sporadic and not confirmed as product defect, but warrant a test wear period.
What’s reassuring
Antimony in polyester
Polyester catalysts sometimes contain antimony trioxide. No specific testing or recalls for Aditech 24 gloves have been reported. Dermal absorption from glove contact is minimal, but inhalation during manufacturing (not consumer risk) is the primary concern.
How is this PFAS grade calculated?
The brand's record and disclosure
Adidas has not published detailed chemical transparency for most of its glove lines, including the Aditech 24. The company has made some public commitments to phase out PFAS in textiles by 2025-2027, but enforcement and verification remain unclear. No specific recalls or safety incidents linked to Aditech 24 gloves have been established in public records. Independent lab testing of Adidas sportswear for PFAS has occasionally detected fluorine signatures, but brand-specific confirmation for this model is absent.
How it compares in its category
Sports gloves with water-repellent coating finishes are industry standard, and most major brands (Nike, Puma, Under Armour) use similar coating strategies without full disclosure. Gloves marketed as PFAS-free or using wax-based water repellency exist but are rarer and often cost more. Aditech 24 sits in the mid-market segment; its lack of transparent water-repellent coating chemistry is typical rather than exceptional in that tier, though not reassuring.
If you buy it
Wash gloves by hand in cool water after heavy use to minimize coating degradation and any potential leaching from the water-repellent coating layer. Avoid machine washing, high heat, and direct sunlight, which can break down synthetic fibers and their treatments. Check for visible coating breakdown (flaking, loss of water beading) and replace when performance drops; worn coatings pose less direct hazard but lose their intended function. Ensure hands are rinsed if you experience persistent itching or rash, as some users report sensitivity to finish chemicals.
What is not known about PFAS in this product?
- Basis
- Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- Adidas has made a specific claim
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Adidas Aditech 24 Glove?
- Steel clubheads, graphite shafts, rubber grips
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Graphite shaft resin degradation and fiber exposure
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
- Cabretta leather, likely tannin-tanned
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Heavy metals
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
- leather or synthetic leather with cotton lining
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Heavy metals
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on AmazonMore golf balls & equipment grades
How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.