PFAS30/ 100Poor
Overall0/ 100Bad
Anasol Protetor Solar Facial

Anasol · Sunscreen

Anasol Protetor Solar Facial

Poor

Waterproof claim raises concern; look for brands with third-party PFAS verification.

Verdict: SkipSunscreen with poor PFAS profile and silent brand stance; acceptable if used sparingly and rinsed thoroughly, but verify ingredient list for additional red flags.

Waterproof sunscreens may contain PFAS water-resistant coatings, though not always. Anasol makes no PFAS disclosure or certification claims.

The safe swap

Vanicream Facial Moisturizer Broad Spectrum SPF 30

Vanicream

Vanicream Facial Moisturizer Broad Spectrum SPF 30

90/100 safety

90Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Sunscreen (likely organic/mineral UV filters + emollient base)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Waterproof claim on facial sunscreen strongly suggests fluorochemical coating; Anasol's silent PFAS stance provides no assurance these are absent or phased out.

Source: ATSDR
20/ 100
🧬

Endocrine disruptors

If formulation contains avobenzone, octinoxate, or oxybenzone (common in non-mineral sunscreens), these have shown estrogenic activity in in vitro studies; facial application on porous skin increases absorption potential.

Source: NIEHS
70/ 100
🫧

Titanium dioxide nanoparticles

Mineral sunscreens often use nano-sized TiO2 for cosmetic elegance; inhalation risk is low in cream form but present if product is powdered or aerosolized.

70/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance and preservative allergens

Regional Brazilian brands typically disclose fragrance as 'perfume' without component listing; methylisothiazolinone or other preservatives may trigger contact dermatitis on sensitive facial skin.

70/ 100

Coating degradation and migration under UV exposure

Waterproof coatings can break down after repeated sun exposure and washing, releasing trapped additives; no data on this specific brand's stability over product shelf life.

70/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Anasol Protetor Solar Facial is a facial sunscreen likely formulated with either organic UV filters (avobenzone, octinoxate, homosalate) or mineral filters (titanium dioxide, zinc oxide), suspended in an emollient base of oils, silicones, or water. The 'waterproof' claim flagged in PFAS assessment suggests fluorinated compounds may be present to achieve water resistance, which is the primary concern here. Facial sunscreens are applied directly to sensitive skin near eyes and mouth, increasing absorption risk for problematic additives.

The brand's record and disclosure

Anasol is a Brazilian cosmetics brand with limited publicly available safety documentation in English-language sources. The brand has not publicly committed to PFAS phase-out or third-party safety certification (such as EWG Verified or similar). No major recalls or safety controversies are documented in accessible records, but the silent stance on PFAS in a waterproof sunscreen formula is a meaningful transparency gap. Ingredient disclosure completeness cannot be verified without access to full formulation labels.

How it compares in its category

Facial sunscreens vary widely in hazard profile depending on filter type and water-resistance claims. Mineral-only sunscreens typically avoid PFAS but may use titanium dioxide nanoparticles (inhalation risk if powder form). Organic-filter products often contain endocrine-active chemicals but fewer water-resistance additives. Anasol's waterproof positioning places it in a higher-risk subcategory; brands like Sunscreen Innovation Lab or EWG-verified lines provide more transparent alternatives. Budget brands without waterproof claims generally have lower PFAS likelihood.

If you buy it

Apply only a dime-sized amount to face and neck; avoid excessive layering. Wash thoroughly with water and mild cleanser at end of day to minimize skin contact time. Do not use if container shows signs of separation or discoloration (may indicate preservative or emollient breakdown). If used near eyes or mouth, rinse promptly if contact occurs. Consider patch-testing on inner arm first, as undisclosed fragrance or preservative allergens are common in regional cosmetics with limited ingredient transparency.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Anasol has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Sunscreen

Goddess Garden Natural Sunscreen SPF 30 6 oz

Goddess Garden

Natural Sunscreen SPF 30 6 oz

mineral-based UV filters, plant-derived waxes

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
🏷️

Fragrance allergens and undisclosed fragrance components

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Skin irritation or photosensitivity from plant oils

Limited concern

70

Lower-concern mineral sunscreen backed by credible PFAS-exclusion certification.

MADE SAFE

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Raw Elements Eco Formula SPF 30 Sunscreen

Raw Elements

Eco Formula SPF 30 Sunscreen

mineral sunscreen (zinc oxide, titanium dioxide)

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade88Excellent
⛏️

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Photocatalytic activity of titanium dioxide in sunlight

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Skin irritation or sensitivity to mineral film

Limited concern

70

Low risk. Mineral sunscreen backed by third-party verification, no fluorochemical history.

MADE SAFE certifiedEWG Verified

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Raw Elements Face & Body Sunscreen Tin SPF 30

Raw Elements

Face & Body Sunscreen Tin SPF 30

mineral sunscreen (zinc oxide/titanium dioxide), tin packaging

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade88Excellent
🍳

Epoxy resin coating in tin lining

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
💨

Nano particle inhalation from loose powder form

Limited concern

70

Low risk. Mineral formula plus explicit PFAS-free stance and certs lower concern.

MADE SAFE CertifiedReef Safe Certified

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

More sunscreen grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.